ChessUSA.com TalkChess.com
Hosted by Your Move Chess & Games
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
Moderators: Robert Hyatt, H.G.Muller, Harvey Williamson

Users browsing this forum: None
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 274, 275, 276  Next
Post new topic
Author Date/Time
Clean Henk van den Belt Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:34 am
       Re: Clean Sven Schüle Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:53 pm
             Re: Clean Daniel Anulliero Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:50 am
             Re: Clean John Merlino Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:24 am
crazyhouse tips? Erin Dame Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:23 pm
       Re: crazyhouse tips? Ferdinand Mosca Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:40 am
Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Cheney Nattress Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
       Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Thomas Kolarik Sat Mar 25, 2017 5:00 pm
       Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Ferdinand Mosca Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:19 am
       Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements H.G.Muller Sun Mar 26, 2017 9:09 am
             Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Peter Österlund Sun Mar 26, 2017 9:49 am
                   Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements H.G.Muller Sun Mar 26, 2017 10:50 am
                         Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Thomas Kolarik Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:31 pm
                               Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements daniel jose Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:43 pm
                                     Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements daniel jose Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:24 pm
                                           Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements daniel jose Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:44 pm
       Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Ferdinand Mosca Sun Mar 26, 2017 4:08 pm
             Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Folkert van Heusden Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:27 pm
                   Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements daniel jose Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:15 pm
                         Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements H.G.Muller Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:27 pm
             Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Ferdinand Mosca Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:18 am
       Re: Testing for Move Ordering Improvements Dennis Sceviour Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:44 pm
Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 12, 2017 6:13 pm
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Gerd Isenberg Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:04 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:43 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:45 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Vladimir Medvedev Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:52 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 4:11 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Gerd Isenberg Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:46 pm
                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:08 pm
                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:24 pm
                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:30 pm
                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:22 pm
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:51 pm
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:26 am
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:42 am
                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:02 am
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Dann Corbit Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:26 am
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:57 am
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:53 pm
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:55 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:23 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:36 pm
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces J. Wesley Cleveland Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:08 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:05 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:11 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:45 pm
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:13 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:55 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:03 am
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:50 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:50 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:20 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:38 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:25 am
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:00 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:14 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:31 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:20 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:16 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:23 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:55 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:00 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:13 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:48 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:55 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:18 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:27 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:47 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:23 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:49 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces J. Wesley Cleveland Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:56 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Roch Manilla Sun Feb 19, 2017 12:32 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 19, 2017 5:44 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Greg Simpson Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:04 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Greg Simpson Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:17 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:35 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:31 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Daniel Anulliero Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:21 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Richard Delorme Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:13 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Jon Fredrik Åsvang Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:34 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:37 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:51 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Thu Feb 23, 2017 1:04 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 23, 2017 6:14 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:52 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:19 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:20 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 26, 2017 4:56 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:23 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:31 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:33 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:16 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:06 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:51 pm
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:10 am
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:29 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:12 pm
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:43 am
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:03 am
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:21 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:50 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:08 am
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Krzysztof Grzelak Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:37 pm
move ordening; how to scale the components? Folkert van Heusden Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:00 pm
       Re: move ordening; how to scale the components? Jon Dart Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:48 pm
Managing draws in the tree search Stuart Cracraft Sun Mar 26, 2017 2:12 pm
       Re: Managing draws in the tree search Martin Sedlak Sun Mar 26, 2017 2:20 pm
             Re: Managing draws in the tree search Stuart Cracraft Sun Mar 26, 2017 2:28 pm
                   Re: Managing draws in the tree search Richard Pijl Sun Mar 26, 2017 2:51 pm
       Re: Managing draws in the tree search Jon Dart Sun Mar 26, 2017 2:39 pm
       Re: Managing draws in the tree search Ferdinand Mosca Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:25 pm
Positional dilemma Fermin Serrano Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:53 pm
       Re: Positional dilemma daniel jose Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:41 pm
             Re: Positional dilemma Fermin Serrano Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:41 pm
                   Re: Positional dilemma Oliver Roese Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:18 am
                   Re: Positional dilemma daniel jose Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:55 am
       Re: Positional dilemma Evert Glebbeek Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:56 pm
Texel tuning method with a small number of positions Pawel Koziol Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:00 pm
       Re: Texel tuning method with a small number of positions Jon Dart Fri Mar 24, 2017 2:55 am
             Re: Texel tuning method with a small number of positions Pawel Koziol Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:07 am
             Re: Texel tuning method with a small number of positions Ferdinand Mosca Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:25 am
                   Re: Texel tuning method with a small number of positions Pawel Koziol Sat Mar 25, 2017 8:16 am
                         Re: Texel tuning method with a small number of positions Ferdinand Mosca Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:48 am
       Re: Texel tuning method with a small number of positions Ferdinand Mosca Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:19 am
SEE implemented the wrong way? Folkert van Heusden Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:34 pm
       Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Henk van den Belt Sat Aug 06, 2016 10:34 am
       Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Alexandru Mosoi Sat Aug 06, 2016 10:56 am
       Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Evert Glebbeek Sun Aug 07, 2016 7:35 am
             Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? H.G.Muller Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:11 am
                   Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Daniel Anulliero Sun Aug 07, 2016 12:46 pm
                         Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? H.G.Muller Sun Aug 07, 2016 2:57 pm
                         Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Shawn Chidester Sun Aug 07, 2016 6:31 pm
                               Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? H.G.Muller Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:46 pm
                   Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Folkert van Heusden Sun Aug 07, 2016 2:11 pm
                   Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Folkert van Heusden Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:30 pm
                         Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? H.G.Muller Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:27 am
       Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Steve Maughan Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:33 am
             Re: SEE implemented the wrong way? Daniel Anulliero Mon Aug 08, 2016 5:34 am
PSQT for move ordering ? Mahmoud Uthman Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:37 pm
       Re: PSQT for move ordering ? Patrik Karlsson Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:15 pm
             Re: PSQT for move ordering ? Mahmoud Uthman Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:18 pm
                   Re: PSQT for move ordering ? Patrik Karlsson Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:25 pm
       Re: PSQT for move ordering ? Jon Dart Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:15 pm
The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:31 pm
       Re: The Inferno thread Srdja Matovic Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:32 pm
             Re: The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:33 pm
                   Re: The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:45 pm
                         Re: The Inferno thread Bojun Guo Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:40 pm
                               Re: The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:09 pm
                               Re: The Inferno thread Evert Glebbeek Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:52 pm
                                     Re: The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:08 pm
                                           Re: The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Wed Mar 08, 2017 9:10 am
                                                 Re: The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Wed Mar 08, 2017 2:04 pm
                                                       Re: The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:17 pm
                                                             Re: The Inferno thread H.G.Muller Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:18 am
                                                                   The Inferno thread: Staged Move Generation H.G.Muller Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:58 pm
                                                                         Re: The Inferno thread: Demon Trading H.G.Muller Sat Mar 11, 2017 9:33 am
                                                                               Re: The Inferno thread: Burn Generation H.G.Muller Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:40 am
                                                                                     Re: The Inferno thread: Incremental Update of Attacks H.G.Muller Sun Mar 12, 2017 12:56 pm
                                                                                           The Inferno thread: Incremental Update of Attacks H.G.Muller Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:03 am
                                                                                           The Inferno thread: Incremental Update of Attacks H.G.Muller Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:07 pm
                                                                                           The Inferno thread: Incremental Update of Attacks H.G.Muller Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:22 pm
                                                                                           Re: The Inferno thread: MakeMove / UnMake H.G.Muller Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:17 pm
                                                                                           The Inferno thread: Promotions H.G.Muller Wed Mar 15, 2017 3:12 pm
                                                                                           Re: The Inferno thread: Non-capture generation H.G.Muller Sat Mar 18, 2017 5:44 pm
                                                                                           The Inferno thread: Non-capture generation H.G.Muller Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:53 pm
                                                                                           Re: The Inferno thread: Non-capture generation H.G.Muller Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:53 am
                                                                                           The Inferno thread: Piece Placement Revisited H.G.Muller Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: The Inferno thread: Perft H.G.Muller Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:09 pm
How to find SMP bugs ? Lucas Braesch Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:07 pm
       Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Martin Sedlak Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:36 pm
             Re: How to find SMP bugs ? daniel jose Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:10 pm
                   Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Martin Sedlak Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:23 pm
                   Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Lucas Braesch Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:42 pm
                         Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Sven Schüle Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:00 pm
             Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Lucas Braesch Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:31 am
                   Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Jon Dart Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:48 pm
                         Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Lucas Braesch Mon Mar 20, 2017 2:50 am
                               Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Sven Schüle Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:33 am
                                     Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Lucas Braesch Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:01 am
                               Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Sven Schüle Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:34 am
                   Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Martin Sedlak Sun Mar 19, 2017 2:44 pm
       Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Sven Schüle Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:09 pm
       Re: How to find SMP bugs ? Jon Dart Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:13 pm
       Re: How to find SMP bugs ? J. Wesley Cleveland Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:53 pm
generating valid moves Folkert van Heusden Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:58 pm
       Re: generating valid moves Jonathan Rosenthal Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:50 pm
       Re: generating valid moves H.G.Muller Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:01 pm
       Re: generating valid moves daniel jose Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:12 pm
Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:15 pm
       Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:03 am
             Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:18 am
                   Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:42 pm
                         Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:44 am
                               Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:15 am
                                     Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:33 pm
                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:53 pm
                                                 Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:43 pm
                                                       Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Mon Jan 30, 2017 5:19 pm
                                                             Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:32 pm
                                                                   Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:52 am
                                                                         Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Tue Jan 31, 2017 2:03 pm
                                                                               Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Fri Feb 03, 2017 11:41 am
                                                                                     Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Fri Feb 03, 2017 2:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Fri Feb 03, 2017 3:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:32 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:48 am
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:33 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Mon Feb 13, 2017 4:11 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Tue Feb 14, 2017 8:39 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:02 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:04 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:17 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Heiner Marxen Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:32 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:48 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Dann Corbit Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:59 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:16 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Tue Feb 14, 2017 8:36 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:37 pm
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:11 am
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) H.G.Muller Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:44 am
                                                                                           Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Greg Neto Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:03 pm
                         Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:57 am
                               Re: Kyoto Shogi (Sjaak?) Evert Glebbeek Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:55 am
Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:50 am
       Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Wed Dec 28, 2016 1:37 pm
             Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Marco Belli Thu Dec 29, 2016 7:29 am
                   Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Thu Dec 29, 2016 6:51 pm
                         Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Sven Schüle Thu Dec 29, 2016 7:27 pm
                               Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:20 pm
                                     Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Sven Schüle Fri Dec 30, 2016 12:09 am
                                     Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Nguyen Pham Fri Dec 30, 2016 2:36 am
                                           Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:23 am
                                                 Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Nguyen Pham Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:20 pm
                                                       Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:35 pm
                                                             Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:22 pm
                                                                   Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Nguyen Pham Sun Jan 01, 2017 1:09 am
                                                                         Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Sun Jan 01, 2017 4:45 pm
                                                                               Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Sun Jan 01, 2017 6:26 pm
       Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Bojun Guo Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:32 am
             Re: Cumulative building of a shared search tree Ferdinand Mosca Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:03 pm
Late move reductions ? Mahmoud Uthman Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:01 am
       Re: Late move reductions ? Ferdinand Mosca Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:31 am
       Re: Late move reductions ? daniel jose Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:22 am
       Re: Late move reductions ? Henk van den Belt Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:40 am
             Re: Late move reductions ? Lyudmil Tsvetkov Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:47 am
                   Re: Late move reductions ? Henk van den Belt Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:59 am
                         Re: Late move reductions ? Lyudmil Tsvetkov Wed Mar 22, 2017 12:15 pm
Looking for the document on Toga II's evaluation terms Andrew Grant Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:00 pm
       Re: Looking for the document on Toga II's evaluation terms Colin Jenkins Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:23 am
smp experiments on gpu... Srdja Matovic Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:13 pm
       Re: smp experiments on gpu... Dann Corbit Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:57 pm
             Re: smp experiments on gpu... Srdja Matovic Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:57 pm
             Re: smp experiments on gpu... Srdja Matovic Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:19 am
Probing tablebases in python-chess Robert Pope Mon Mar 20, 2017 2:25 am
       Re: Probing tablebases in python-chess Ferdinand Mosca Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:17 am
             Re: Probing tablebases in python-chess Robert Pope Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:09 am
speed up or avoiding move sorting Alexandru Mosoi Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:18 pm
       Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Mark Lefler Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:53 pm
       Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Rasmus Althoff Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:30 pm
             Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Alexandru Mosoi Sun Mar 19, 2017 11:37 pm
                   Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Rasmus Althoff Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:59 am
       Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting H.G.Muller Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:59 pm
             Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting H.G.Muller Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:53 am
                   Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Alexandru Mosoi Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:52 pm
                         Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting H.G.Muller Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:20 pm
       Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Martin Sedlak Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:13 pm
             Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Rasmus Althoff Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:32 pm
                   Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Martin Sedlak Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:35 pm
                   Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Martin Sedlak Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:46 pm
                         Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Rasmus Althoff Sun Mar 19, 2017 11:30 pm
             Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Alexandru Mosoi Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:10 pm
       Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Engin Üstün Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:40 am
       Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Stan Arts Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:20 am
             Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting H.G.Muller Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:27 am
                   Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Engin Üstün Mon Mar 20, 2017 1:48 pm
                         Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting H.G.Muller Mon Mar 20, 2017 2:51 pm
             Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Jon Dart Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:07 pm
       Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Joseph Koss Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:35 am
             Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Sven Schüle Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:51 am
       Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting Oliver Roese Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:10 am
             Re: speed up or avoiding move sorting H.G.Muller Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:18 pm
Post new topic    TalkChess.com Forum Index -> Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 274, 275, 276  Next
Page 1 of 276
Jump to:  
  You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Enhanced with Moby Threads