ChessUSA.com TalkChess.com
Hosted by Your Move Chess & Games
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
Moderators: Robert Hyatt, H.G.Muller, Harvey Williamson

Users browsing this forum: None
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 293, 294, 295  Next
Post new topic
Author Date/Time
I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:06 am
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Marco Belli Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:47 am
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:03 am
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Nguyen Pham Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:11 am
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:21 am
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Nguyen Pham Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:42 am
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:51 am
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:07 am
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:21 am
                                     Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:23 am
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:42 am
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:05 am
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:27 am
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:34 am
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:54 am
                                     Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:00 am
                                           Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:09 am
                                           Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:20 am
                                                 Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:48 am
                                                       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:40 pm
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:56 pm
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:34 pm
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:39 pm
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:59 pm
On-line engine blitz tourney February H.G.Muller Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:16 am
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Folkert van Heusden Thu Feb 15, 2018 1:20 pm
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:50 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Folkert van Heusden Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:04 pm
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:13 pm
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Daniel Anulliero Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:29 pm
                         Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:59 pm
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Vivien Clauzon Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:21 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Robert Pope Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:57 pm
       ScorpioMCTS with treeht=infinity will be there. Daniel Shawul Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:19 pm
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Gregory Strong Sat Feb 17, 2018 5:31 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February H.G.Muller Sat Feb 17, 2018 5:48 pm
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February H.G.Muller Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:09 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Jonathan Rosenthal Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:24 am
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Álvaro Begué Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:13 am
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February P. Kumar Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:43 am
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February H.G.Muller Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:04 am
                         Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Colin Jenkins Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:53 am
                               Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Tamás Kuzmics Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:18 pm
Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 12, 2017 6:13 pm
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Gerd Isenberg Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:04 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:43 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:45 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Vladimir Medvedev Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:52 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 4:11 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Gerd Isenberg Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:46 pm
                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:08 pm
                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:24 pm
                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:30 pm
                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:22 pm
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:51 pm
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:26 am
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:42 am
                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:02 am
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Dann Corbit Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:26 am
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:57 am
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:53 pm
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:55 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:23 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:36 pm
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces J. Wesley Cleveland Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:08 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:05 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:11 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:45 pm
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:13 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:55 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:03 am
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:50 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:50 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:20 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:38 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:25 am
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:00 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:14 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:31 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:20 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:16 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:23 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:55 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:00 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:13 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:48 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:55 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:18 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:27 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:47 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:23 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:49 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces J. Wesley Cleveland Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:56 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Roch Manilla Sun Feb 19, 2017 12:32 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 19, 2017 5:44 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Greg Simpson Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:04 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Greg Simpson Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:17 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:35 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:31 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Daniel Anulliero Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:21 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Richard Delorme Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:13 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Jon Fredrik Åsvang Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:34 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:37 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:51 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Thu Feb 23, 2017 1:04 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 23, 2017 6:14 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:52 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:19 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:20 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 26, 2017 4:56 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:23 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:31 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Michael B Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:39 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:33 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:16 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:06 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:51 pm
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:10 am
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:29 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:12 pm
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:43 am
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:03 am
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:21 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:50 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:08 am
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Krzysztof Grzelak Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:37 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sat Feb 17, 2018 7:16 pm
Compile stockfish 9? Dan Buske Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:04 pm
       Re: Compile stockfish 9? Louis Zulli Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:20 pm
       Re: Compile stockfish 9? Andrew Grant Fri Feb 16, 2018 5:59 am
             Re: Compile stockfish 9? Eelco de Groot Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:17 pm
Near-random movers Robert Pope Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:36 am
       Re: Near-random movers Ray Banks Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:11 am
       Re: Near-random movers Werner Taelemans Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:38 am
             Re: Near-random movers Robert Pope Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:34 pm
       Re: Near-random movers Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:33 pm
       Re: Near-random movers Folkert van Heusden Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:52 pm
       Re: Near-random movers Volker Annuss Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:41 pm
             Re: Near-random movers Robert Pope Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:17 am
                   Re: Near-random movers Volker Annuss Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:40 pm
                         Re: Near-random movers Robert Pope Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:54 pm
       Re: Near-random movers Luis Babboni Thu Feb 15, 2018 1:49 am
Chess Programming Wiki Jon Dart Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:35 pm
       Re: Chess Programming Wiki Joseph Koss Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:11 pm
             Re: Chess Programming Wiki Joseph Koss Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:48 am
                   Re: Chess Programming Wiki Brahim Hamadicharef Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:49 pm
                   Re: Chess Programming Wiki Nguyen Pham Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:17 am
                   Re: Chess Programming Wiki Mark Lefler Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:47 pm
       Re: Chess Programming Wiki Gerd Isenberg Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:32 pm
       Re: Chess Programming Wiki Rasmus Althoff Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:30 pm
       Re: Chess Programming Wiki Vincent Lejeune Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:26 pm
Pawn Storm - Theory Dennis Sceviour Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:58 pm
       Pawn Storm - Application Dennis Sceviour Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:05 pm
       Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Jon Dart Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:05 am
             Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Dennis Sceviour Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:31 am
                   Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Jon Dart Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:43 pm
                         Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Daniel Anulliero Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:19 pm
                         Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Dennis Sceviour Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:49 pm
Learning piece-square table Mathieu Pagé Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:49 pm
       Re: Learning piece-square table Eugene Kotlov Tue Feb 13, 2018 1:49 pm
             Re: Learning piece-square table Mathieu Pagé Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:06 am
       Re: Learning piece-square table Jonathan Rosenthal Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:01 pm
             Re: Learning piece-square table Eugene Kotlov Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:36 pm
                   Re: Learning piece-square table Dann Corbit Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:40 pm
                         Re: Learning piece-square table Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:48 pm
                               Re: Learning piece-square table Dann Corbit Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:53 pm
                               Re: Learning piece-square table Robert Pope Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:54 pm
                                     Re: Learning piece-square table Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:58 pm
                         Re: Learning piece-square table Jonathan Rosenthal Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:43 am
             Re: Learning piece-square table Mathieu Pagé Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:15 am
                   Re: Learning piece-square table Evert Glebbeek Wed Feb 14, 2018 6:10 am
Deep misery Henk van den Belt Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:34 pm
       Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:48 pm
             Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:55 pm
                   Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:08 pm
                         Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:42 pm
                               Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:56 pm
                                     Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:17 pm
                                           Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:03 pm
                                           Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:19 am
                                                 Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:38 pm
                                                       Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:50 pm
                                                             Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:30 pm
                   Re: Deep misery Truls Edvard Stokke Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:38 pm
                         Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:45 pm
finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:50 pm
       Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Guenther Simon Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:24 pm
             Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:52 pm
                   Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Guenther Simon Sat Feb 10, 2018 6:41 pm
       Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Ed Schroder Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:21 pm
             Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:45 pm
                   Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Ed Schroder Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:54 pm
                         Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:02 pm
                               Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Sander Maassen vd Brink Sun Feb 11, 2018 7:13 am
                               Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Ed Schroder Sun Feb 11, 2018 7:30 am
                                     Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Sander Maassen vd Brink Sun Feb 11, 2018 11:15 am
                                     Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sun Feb 11, 2018 11:26 am
                                           Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sun Feb 11, 2018 8:42 pm
Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 2:54 pm
       Re: Gigatron emulation H.G.Muller Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:29 pm
             Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:08 pm
                   Re: Gigatron emulation H.G.Muller Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:37 pm
       Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 7:22 pm
             Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:57 pm
             Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 11, 2018 5:46 pm
       Re: Gigatron emulation Rémi Coulom Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:30 pm
             Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:50 pm
                   Re: Gigatron emulation H.G.Muller Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:03 pm
                         Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:10 pm
                               Re: Gigatron emulation H.G.Muller Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:35 pm
magic number comprising offset Eugene Kotlov Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:23 pm
       Re: magic number comprising offset Gerd Isenberg Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:22 am
             Re: magic number comprising offset Eugene Kotlov Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:56 am
                   Re: magic number comprising offset Dann Corbit Sun Feb 11, 2018 10:47 am
       Re: magic number comprising offset Marco Belli Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:32 am
             Re: magic number comprising offset Eugene Kotlov Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:04 am
Fen is incomplete Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:46 am
       Re: Fen is incomplete H.G.Muller Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:05 am
             Re: Fen is incomplete Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:46 am
       Re: Fen is incomplete Kerry Liles Fri Feb 02, 2018 9:15 pm
             Re: Fen is incomplete Louis Zulli Fri Feb 02, 2018 9:19 pm
             Re: Fen is incomplete Robert Hyatt Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:00 pm
                   Re: Fen is incomplete Kerry Liles Wed Feb 07, 2018 4:21 pm
Data steal Henk van den Belt Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:42 pm
       Re: Data steal - games Srdja Matovic Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:38 am
             Re: Data steal - games Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 01, 2018 4:07 pm
                   Re: Data steal - games Srdja Matovic Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:21 pm
                         Re: Data steal - games Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:20 pm
                               Re: Data steal - games Srdja Matovic Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:48 pm
replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Uri Blass Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:28 pm
       Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Louis Zulli Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:22 pm
             Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Uri Blass Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:52 pm
                   Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Dann Corbit Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:01 pm
                         Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself H.G.Muller Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:35 pm
                               Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Dann Corbit Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:42 pm
                         Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Evert Glebbeek Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:37 pm
                         Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Uri Blass Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:12 am
                               Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Dann Corbit Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:14 am
                   Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Louis Zulli Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:21 pm
                         Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Uri Blass Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:30 am
                               Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Ulysses P. Fri Jan 26, 2018 5:01 pm
       Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Alberto Sanjuan Wed Jan 31, 2018 9:52 am
             Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Ulysses P. Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:24 pm
                   Re: replace the evaluation by playing against yourself Alberto Sanjuan Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:36 pm
MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:47 am
       Re: MutliPV behavior? Marco Belli Thu Jan 25, 2018 7:20 am
             Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Thu Jan 25, 2018 7:37 am
                   Re: MutliPV behavior? Andrew Grant Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:15 am
                   Re: MutliPV behavior? Marco Belli Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:22 am
                         Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:31 am
                               Re: MutliPV behavior? Marco Belli Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:38 am
                                     Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:07 am
                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Marco Belli Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:27 am
                                                 Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:39 am
                                                       Re: MutliPV behavior? Marco Belli Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:01 am
                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:10 am
                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Milos Stanisavljevic Thu Jan 25, 2018 1:17 pm
                               Re: MutliPV behavior? Andrew Grant Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:39 am
                   Re: MutliPV behavior? Ronald de Man Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:57 pm
                         Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Fri Jan 26, 2018 4:52 pm
                               Re: MutliPV behavior? Ronald de Man Fri Jan 26, 2018 5:42 pm
                                     Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:23 am
                               Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Fri Jan 26, 2018 5:49 pm
                                     Re: MutliPV behavior? Marco Belli Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:00 pm
                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Ronald de Man Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:18 pm
                                     Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:02 am
                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:09 am
                                                 Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:43 am
                                                       Re: MutliPV behavior? Marco Belli Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:02 pm
                                                       Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:26 pm
                                                             Re: MutliPV behavior? Ronald de Man Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:39 pm
                                                                   Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:25 pm
                                                                         Re: MutliPV behavior? Ronald de Man Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:04 pm
                                                                               Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Sat Jan 27, 2018 7:03 pm
                                                                                     Re: MutliPV behavior? Ronald de Man Sat Jan 27, 2018 7:17 pm
                                                                                     Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Sun Jan 28, 2018 4:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Ronald de Man Sun Jan 28, 2018 5:26 pm
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:05 am
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:16 am
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Mon Jan 29, 2018 6:53 pm
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Tue Jan 30, 2018 10:49 am
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:13 am
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Ronald de Man Wed Jan 31, 2018 7:48 am
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Wed Jan 31, 2018 10:06 am
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:26 pm
                                                                                           Re: MutliPV behavior? Joerg Oster Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:17 pm
       Re: MutliPV behavior? Richard Delorme Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:59 am
             Re: MutliPV behavior? Ulysses P. Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:09 am
                   Re: MutliPV behavior? Richard Delorme Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:27 am
Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Daniel Shawul Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:59 pm
       Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Aleks Peshkov Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:27 am
             Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Daniel Shawul Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:03 am
       alpha-beta + Nullmove + LMR in rollouts Daniel Shawul Fri Jan 26, 2018 6:44 pm
             Re: alpha-beta + Nullmove + LMR in rollouts Dann Corbit Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:00 pm
                   Re: alpha-beta + Nullmove + LMR in rollouts Daniel Shawul Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:14 pm
                         Re: alpha-beta + Nullmove + LMR in rollouts Jonathan Rosenthal Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:28 am
                               Re: alpha-beta + Nullmove + LMR in rollouts Daniel Shawul Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:12 pm
       Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Daniel Shawul Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:32 pm
             Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Guenther Simon Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:42 pm
             Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Michel Van den Bergh Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:46 am
                   Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Michel Van den Bergh Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:19 am
                         Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Daniel Shawul Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:01 pm
                               Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Daniel Shawul Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:01 pm
                                     Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Dann Corbit Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:50 pm
                                           Re: Alpha-Beta as a rollouts algorithm Daniel Shawul Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:44 pm
Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Steve Maughan Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:43 am
       Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Robin Messemer Mon Jan 29, 2018 12:40 pm
             Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Álvaro Begué Mon Jan 29, 2018 12:49 pm
CT800 engine: Android problems? Rasmus Althoff Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:39 pm
       Re: CT800 engine: Android problems? Ferdinand Mosca Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:21 am
             Re: CT800 engine: Android problems? Rasmus Althoff Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:02 am
                   Re: CT800 engine: Android problems? Ferdinand Mosca Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:56 am
                         Re: CT800 engine: Android problems? Rasmus Althoff Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:09 pm
       Re: CT800 engine: Android problems? Aart Bik Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:11 pm
             Re: CT800 engine: Android problems? Rasmus Althoff Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:44 pm
       Partly solved! Rasmus Althoff Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:54 pm
       Completely solved. Rasmus Althoff Sat Jan 27, 2018 8:52 pm
Question about EGT formats H.G.Muller Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:48 pm
       Re: Question about EGT formats Dann Corbit Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:00 pm
             Re: Question about EGT formats Daniel Shawul Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:03 pm
                   Re: Question about EGT formats Bajusz Tamás Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:43 pm
Post new topic    TalkChess.com Forum Index -> Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 293, 294, 295  Next
Page 1 of 295
Jump to:  
  You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Enhanced with Moby Threads