You must be snakebit, George. I've had good luck with Win 7.geots wrote:Because whoever thought up Windows 7 should be chained to a stovepipe in hell.
Best
Dan H.
Moderator: Ras
You must be snakebit, George. I've had good luck with Win 7.geots wrote:Because whoever thought up Windows 7 should be chained to a stovepipe in hell.
For a clarification, could you explain that you mean XEON based on Ivy Bridge, and not standard Ivy Bridge which is detailed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge ... tecture%29 ?NATIONAL12 wrote:I am waiting for Ivy Bridge,end of year and hope intel will allow O/C with those cpu's.
Dan Honeycutt wrote:You must be snakebit, George. I've had good luck with Win 7.geots wrote:Because whoever thought up Windows 7 should be chained to a stovepipe in hell.
Best
Dan H.
Dragulic wrote:First, may I introduce myself to this learned and distinguished forum? I am a research engineer with limited brains but still more limited money to spend on my hobby of Chess and Go.
So to my question. For chess research and other, gp uses, I am now ready to spend $8k on a Windows PC, now. I plan (all parts are shipping already):
Win 8 is Win 7 with a different interface.geots wrote:Dragulic wrote:First, may I introduce myself to this learned and distinguished forum? I am a research engineer with limited brains but still more limited money to spend on my hobby of Chess and Go.
So to my question. For chess research and other, gp uses, I am now ready to spend $8k on a Windows PC, now. I plan (all parts are shipping already):
2 x E5-2687W Intel Sandy Bridge Xeon S2011 CPUs. 8 Real Cores per CPU. Here http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/xeo ... ,3149.html is the review. It will run all 16 cores at 3.4GHz in turbo mode, even before overclocking. Today many top engines are not so good above 4 cores, but soon this can change.
64Gb Corsair PC3-12800 (1.6GHz) DDR3 Quad Channel RAM (4 x 16Gb). This gives 4Gb per real core. Ideal?
SuperMicro X9DAi motherboard with SATA III 6Gb/s, PCI-E 3.0. Here http://www.supermicro.com/products/moth ... /X9DAi.cfm are the specification.
SSD HDD for fast EGTB access, capacity to be researched but I think 0.3Tb is enough, I can move needed EGTBs from main HDD as needed. Big SSD/array are still too expensive.
Top-end air-cooling. Or?
Rest can be obvious, Windows 7 64 bit Ultimate (8 will be bad, microsoft alternation good-bad-good-bad-), very fine 0.9kW modular PSU, some cr-p graphics card for kids, 3Gb 120Hz Barracuda HDD...
I would like commentaries, critiques and recommendations. E5-2687W looks like the real winner, but you may have more information? AMD quad CPU each 4/6-core? What chess and overclock speeds can I expect? Is there a better mobo for overclocking? Is RAM chosen a bottleneck? Other understanding error by me? Anyone else already got similar system? I can see one kburcham was considering this: http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41204. A Sedat Canbaz benchmark yet? Help!
TU, friends.......
Glad to hear that microsoft alternates good-bad-good-bad! If that is true, then the next operating system is destined to be the best thing to ever hit the face of the earth.
Because whoever thought up Windows 7 should be chained to a stovepipe in hell.
Yep,it was about time for a bad releaseDragulic wrote:Yes, but you may be out of sync? Good/Bad are relative.geots wrote: Glad to hear that microsoft alternates good-bad-good-bad!
Taking mainstream (so, no NT or 2000):
Win 1/2/3... All bad, did not even work
Win 3.1/3.11... Good
Win 95... Bad
Win 98/SE... Good
Win Millennium... Bad
Win XP... Good
Win Vista... Bad
Win 7... Good, surely much better then Vista
Win 8...
They're like Star Trek movies.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Yep,it was about time for a bad releaseDragulic wrote:Yes, but you may be out of sync? Good/Bad are relative.geots wrote: Glad to hear that microsoft alternates good-bad-good-bad!
Taking mainstream (so, no NT or 2000):
Win 1/2/3... All bad, did not even work
Win 3.1/3.11... Good
Win 95... Bad
Win 98/SE... Good
Win Millennium... Bad
Win XP... Good
Win Vista... Bad
Win 7... Good, surely much better then Vista
Win 8...![]()
It is very limited, relative to size of one worldwide derivatives market, sized in 2010 @ $1,200,000,000,000,000.00 (one thousand two hundred trillion dollars). http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/06/09/ ... market-gdpacase wrote:$8000 doesn't sound very "limited"
Then, it can be Win 8 is good. Next one will be bad.Terry McCracken wrote:Win 8 is Win 7 with a different interface.
Absolutely TerryTerry McCracken wrote:They're like Star Trek movies.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Yep,it was about time for a bad releaseDragulic wrote:Yes, but you may be out of sync? Good/Bad are relative.geots wrote: Glad to hear that microsoft alternates good-bad-good-bad!
Taking mainstream (so, no NT or 2000):
Win 1/2/3... All bad, did not even work
Win 3.1/3.11... Good
Win 95... Bad
Win 98/SE... Good
Win Millennium... Bad
Win XP... Good
Win Vista... Bad
Win 7... Good, surely much better then Vista
Win 8...![]()
It is, but...for most of us the interface sucks! How to ruin a good thing?Dragulic wrote:It is very limited, relative to size of one worldwide derivatives market, sized in 2010 @ $1,200,000,000,000,000.00 (one thousand two hundred trillion dollars). http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/06/09/ ... market-gdpacase wrote:$8000 doesn't sound very "limited"
In crazy world, only Go make sense. Chess is more sinister then Go, but still make more sense then world.
Then, it can be Win 8 is good. Next one will be bad.Terry McCracken wrote:Win 8 is Win 7 with a different interface.
But, where this leaves my quest for the chess research rig? 2 x X5690 or 2 x X5680 will defeat all released unoverclockable E5s.