| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Vincent Diepeveen
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1738 Location: The Netherlands
|
Post subject: Re: Mobility eval Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:31 pm |
|
|
| Don wrote: |
| Mincho Georgiev wrote: |
Unfortunately, is heavily weights dependent.
I've tested the following schemes:
1. "real mobility" - no LVA attacked squares - with increments.
2. -||- - no pawn attacked squares - increments.
2. mobility with increments including capturing squares /all captures/.
3. mobility without occupied squares.
4. "space" - all squares regardless of the attack on each one of them - with no increments, but collective bonus instead.
For me, No.4 works best. It could be just a good balancing regarding the rest of the evaluation terms tough, I'm pretty sure - it's all about the weights and that makes it so hard to find the best one - needs A LOT of testing.
Plus to No.4 - I'm testing for center control and wide center control. It gives me good results, combined with the collective "space" bonuses/penalties. |
The problem with any way of doing evaluation is that you cannot be sure that you implemented it the best way. Komodo's is relatively elaborate, but who is to say it's any good? It could be that it works because we are missing other important terms or because we did not set the weights right for previous simpler attempts. All evaluation is like this, it's really a black art. |
The problem is measuring whether something works.
Maybe 1 million games at say 5 minutes all? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Mobility eval |
H.G.Muller |
Tue May 01, 2012 11:44 am |
Re: Mobility eval |
Lucas Braesch |
Tue May 01, 2012 2:22 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 01, 2012 3:59 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 01, 2012 4:03 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Tue May 01, 2012 4:32 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
H.G.Muller |
Tue May 01, 2012 8:18 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
H.G.Muller |
Tue May 01, 2012 8:35 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Chris Whittington |
Wed May 02, 2012 8:48 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Don Dailey |
Wed May 02, 2012 9:14 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Chris Whittington |
Thu May 03, 2012 8:27 am |
Re: Mobility eval |
Ferdinand Mosca |
Thu May 03, 2012 10:27 am |
Re: Mobility eval |
Pawel Koziol |
Fri May 04, 2012 12:11 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Mincho Georgiev |
Tue May 01, 2012 4:36 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 01, 2012 4:45 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Tue May 01, 2012 5:31 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 01, 2012 5:33 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Thu May 03, 2012 9:16 am |
Re: Mobility eval |
Dan Honeycutt |
Fri May 04, 2012 6:58 pm |
Re: Mobility eval |
Ferdinand Mosca |
Thu May 03, 2012 9:40 am |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|