Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Uri Blass
Posts: 11219
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by Uri Blass »

rbarreira wrote:
Uri Blass wrote:
Houdini wrote:
JuLieN wrote:INCREDIBLE!!!! Now that's exciting!!! :D

A miniature game in a world chess championship!!! :shock: That was a superb reaction by Anand, and Gelfand couldn't stand the pressure of being in the lead. Amazing!!!

EDIT: Thx for posting the game, Robert.
Exciting, but equally sad that a game with so much potential was ended by a stupid blunder.
Anand will be delighted, for the rest of the match Gelfand will now have doubts about his tactical computations.

Robert
It is a tactical mistake but I do not call it "a stupid blunder"
A stupid blunder is something that most strong players are not going to miss even without an engine.
Yeah the live commentators (both being GMs) also missed the queen getting trapped.

Since Kramnik missed a mate-in-1 it's hard to call anything an incredible blunder...
My opinion is that if most strong players understand that a move is a mistake at real time without an engine before seeing the refutation then it is correct to call it a blunder.

I believe that it is the case for the mate in 1 that kramnik missed against Fritz.
Guenther
Posts: 4718
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by Guenther »

Strelkaman wrote:
I think Qf6 is a tactical mistake,QxRh1 is a blunder because you hung the queen.
We all know by now that Qf6 was a tactical mistake no need to repeat it,
as it was already said in the thread. Moreover Qxh1 was no blunder and does
not hang a Q it was just the consequence of Qf6, but White remains with a
lot of attacking power and by far better position. Still it seems Gelfand
resigned too early and was somehow shocked by Qf2...

Guenther
lucasart
Posts: 3243
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by lucasart »

Houdini wrote:[Event "World Chess Championship"]
[Site "Moscow"]
[Date "2012.05.21"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Anand, Viswanathan"]
[Black "Gelfand, Boris"]
[ECO "E60"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. f3 c5 4. d5 d6 5. e4 Bg7 6. Ne2 O-O
7. Nec3 Nh5 8. Bg5 Bf6 9. Bxf6 exf6 10. Qd2 f5 11. exf5
Bxf5 12. g4 Re8+ 13. Kd1 Bxb1 14. Rxb1 Qf6 15. gxh5 Qxf3+
16. Kc2 Qxh1 17. Qf2 1-0

[d]rn2r1k1/pp3p1p/3p2p1/2pP3P/2P5/2N5/PPK2Q1P/1R3B1q b - -
How about the defense: Nc6! dxc6 Qxc6 Bg2 Qd7 Nd5 Kf8 Nf6
[d]r3rk2/pp1q1p1p/3p1Np1/2p4P/2P5/8/PPK2QBP/1R6 b - -
That's not 1-0 yet ? White is better, but I (and my engine DiscoCheck) can't see any clearly winning continuation yet
zullil
Posts: 6442
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
Location: PA USA
Full name: Louis Zulli

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by zullil »

lucasart wrote:
Houdini wrote:[Event "World Chess Championship"]
[Site "Moscow"]
[Date "2012.05.21"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Anand, Viswanathan"]
[Black "Gelfand, Boris"]
[ECO "E60"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. f3 c5 4. d5 d6 5. e4 Bg7 6. Ne2 O-O
7. Nec3 Nh5 8. Bg5 Bf6 9. Bxf6 exf6 10. Qd2 f5 11. exf5
Bxf5 12. g4 Re8+ 13. Kd1 Bxb1 14. Rxb1 Qf6 15. gxh5 Qxf3+
16. Kc2 Qxh1 17. Qf2 1-0

[d]rn2r1k1/pp3p1p/3p2p1/2pP3P/2P5/2N5/PPK2Q1P/1R3B1q b - -
How about the defense: Nc6! dxc6 Qxc6 Bg2 Qd7 Nd5 Kf8 Nf6
Critter-1.4 offers:

Code: Select all

24/62  02:28 1462101957 9868931  -1.66 Nc6 dxc6 Qxc6 Bd3 Re5 Rf1 Qc7 Nd5 Rxd5 cxd5 c4 Be2 Re8 h4 Re5 Bg4 Qe7 Qf6 b5 Qxe7 Rxe7 hxg6 hxg6 Rf6 Re4 Bd1 Rxh4 Rxd6 Kg7 Ra6 Rh2+ Kc1 f5 Rxa7+ Kf6 Ra6+ Ke5 d6 Ke6 a4 bxa4 d7+ Kxd7 Bxa4+ Ke7 Rxg6
tano-urayoan
Posts: 638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by tano-urayoan »

lucasart wrote: How about the defense: Nc6! dxc6 Qxc6 Bg2 Qd7 Nd5 Kf8 Nf6
[d]r3rk2/pp1q1p1p/3p1Np1/2p4P/2P5/8/PPK2QBP/1R6 b - -
That's not 1-0 yet ? White is better, but I (and my engine DiscoCheck) can't see any clearly winning continuation yet
I don't think Nf6 is necessary maybe first Rf1 or hxg6 hxg6 Rf1 and later h4.. White looks clearly winning but maybe not immediately.
Uri Blass
Posts: 11219
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by Uri Blass »

lucasart wrote:
Houdini wrote:[Event "World Chess Championship"]
[Site "Moscow"]
[Date "2012.05.21"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Anand, Viswanathan"]
[Black "Gelfand, Boris"]
[ECO "E60"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. f3 c5 4. d5 d6 5. e4 Bg7 6. Ne2 O-O
7. Nec3 Nh5 8. Bg5 Bf6 9. Bxf6 exf6 10. Qd2 f5 11. exf5
Bxf5 12. g4 Re8+ 13. Kd1 Bxb1 14. Rxb1 Qf6 15. gxh5 Qxf3+
16. Kc2 Qxh1 17. Qf2 1-0

[d]rn2r1k1/pp3p1p/3p2p1/2pP3P/2P5/2N5/PPK2Q1P/1R3B1q b - -
How about the defense: Nc6! dxc6 Qxc6 Bg2 Qd7 Nd5 Kf8 Nf6
[d]r3rk2/pp1q1p1p/3p1Np1/2p4P/2P5/8/PPK2QBP/1R6 b - -
That's not 1-0 yet ? White is better, but I (and my engine DiscoCheck) can't see any clearly winning continuation yet
I believe that at the level of strong GM's it is clearly winning and white does not need to play 19.Bg2 and can play also 19.Bd3

Here is some analysis by houdini

FEN: r3r1k1/pp3p1p/2qp2p1/2p4P/2P5/2N5/PPK2Q1P/1R3B2 w - - 0 19

Houdini_15_x64:
4/15 00:00 3,067 306,000 +0.39 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Bg2-d5 g6-g5 Rb1-f1
5/15 00:00 3,626 362,000 +0.39 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Bg2-d5 g6-g5 Rb1-f1
6/19 00:00 6,778 677,000 +0.41 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Bg2-d5 Kg8-g7 Qf2-f4 Kg7-g8 Rb1-f1
7/19 00:00 8,603 860,000 +0.41 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Bg2-d5 Kg8-g7 Qf2-f4 Kg7-g8 Rb1-f1
8/19+ 00:00 9,664 966,000 +0.47 Bf1-g2
8/19+ 00:00 11,015 1,101,000 +0.61 Bf1-g2
8/20 00:00 22,148 851,000 +0.47 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Bg2-d5 Re8-e5 h5xg6 h7xg6 Rb1-g1 g6-g5 Rg1-f1
9/20+ 00:00 26,075 931,000 +0.53 Bf1-g2
9/20+ 00:00 27,704 955,000 +0.68 Bf1-g2
9/26 00:00 203,037 2,159,000 +0.36 Rb1-c1 Re8-e5 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 Qc6xd5 h5xg6 h7xg6 Rc1-d1 Qd5xa2 Rd1xd6 c5-c4 Qf2-e3
10/26+ 00:00 232,287 2,212,000 +0.42 Rb1-c1
10/26+ 00:00 286,296 2,385,000 +0.54 Rb1-c1
10/26 00:00 292,706 2,360,000 +0.53 Rb1-c1 Re8-e5 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 Qc6xd5 Rc1-d1 Qd5xh5 Rd1xd6 Ra8-f8 Rd6-d7 Qh5-g4 Rd7-e7 c5-c4
11/28- 00:00 386,521 2,461,000 +0.47 Rb1-c1 Re8-e5
11/30+ 00:00 485,597 2,639,000 +0.61 Bf1-g2
11/30 00:00 546,111 2,690,000 +0.53 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Nc3-d5 Kg8-f8 Nd5-f6 Qd7-e6 Bg2-f1 Qe6-e3 Qf2-h4 Re8-e7 h5-h6 Ra8-c8 Nf6xh7+ Kf8-g8 Nh7-f6+ Kg8-h8
12/30 00:00 696,603 2,797,000 +0.53 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Nc3-d5 Kg8-f8 Nd5-f6 Qd7-e6 Bg2-f1 Qe6-e3 Qf2-h4 Re8-e7 h5-h6 Ra8-c8 Nf6xh7+ Kf8-g8 Nh7-f6+ Kg8-h8
12/30+ 00:00 957,024 2,953,000 +0.61 h5xg6
12/32+ 00:00 1,065,434 3,026,000 +0.78 h5xg6
12/32 00:00 1,686,952 3,314,000 +0.77 h5xg6 h7xg6 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 f7-f5 Qf2-g3 Kg8-f7 Nc3-d5 Ra8-g8 Qg3-g5 Rg8-g7 Rf1-g1 Qc6-a4+ Kc2-b1 Qa4-a5 Qg5-h4 b7-b5 a2-a3 b5xc4 Bd3xc4
13/36+ 00:00 2,484,148 3,384,000 +0.85 h5xg6
13/36 00:00 2,637,387 3,385,000 +0.76 h5xg6 h7xg6 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 h2-h4 Ra8-e8 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Re8-e5 Kc2-b1 b7-b5 Be2-f3 b5-b4 Qf2-d4 b4-b3 Rf1-g1 b3xa2+ Kb1xa2 Qc7-a5+ Ka2-b1
13/36+ 00:01 3,517,377 3,461,000 +1.02 Bf1-g2
13/36 00:01 3,647,849 3,457,000 +1.02 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Nc3-d5 Kg8-f8 Rb1-f1 Qd7-f5+ Qf2xf5 g6xf5 Kc2-d3 Re8-e5 Nd5-e3 f5-f4 Rf1xf4 Ra8-e8 Ne3-g4 Re5-e2 Bg2-d5 Re8-e7 Rf4xf7+ Re7xf7 Kd3xe2
14/39 00:01 4,508,967 3,506,000 +1.02 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Nc3-d5 Kg8-f8 Nd5-f6 Qd7-e6 Bg2-f1 Qe6-e3 Qf2-h4 g6-g5 Nf6xh7+ Kf8-g8 Nh7xg5 Re8-e5 Ng5-h3 Qe3-h6 Rb1-d1 Kg8-h8 Kc2-b1 Re5xh5 Qh4-g3 Ra8-g8 Qg3xd6 Qh6xd6 Rd1xd6
15/39 00:01 4,712,895 3,498,000 +1.02 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Nc3-d5 Kg8-f8 Nd5-f6 Qd7-e6 Bg2-f1 Qe6-e3 Qf2-h4 g6-g5 Nf6xh7+ Kf8-g8 Nh7xg5 Re8-e5 Ng5-h3 Qe3-h6 Rb1-d1 Kg8-h8 Kc2-b1 Re5xh5 Qh4-g3 Ra8-g8 Qg3xd6 Qh6xd6 Rd1xd6
16/39 00:01 5,699,109 3,564,000 +0.97 Bf1-g2 Qc6-d7 Nc3-d5 Kg8-f8 Nd5-f6 Qd7-e6 Bg2-f1 Qe6-e3 Qf2-h4 g6-g5 Nf6xh7+ Kf8-g8 Nh7xg5 Re8-e5 Ng5-h3 Qe3-h6 Rb1-d1 Re5xh5 Qh4-g3+ Qh6-g7 Rd1xd6 Ra8-e8 Nh3-f4 Rh5-g5 Qg3-d3
16/40+ 00:02 8,938,929 3,706,000 +1.10 Bf1-d3
16/45+ 00:03 12,884,815 3,768,000 +1.26 Bf1-d3
16/47 00:05 21,435,531 3,874,000 +1.19 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 Be2-d1 Qc7-e7 Qf2xa7 Qe7-e4+ Kc2-c1 Qe4xd5 h2-h4 Qd5-e5 h5xg6 f7xg6 Qa7-f2 b7-b5 Qf2-f7+ Kg8-h8 Qf7-f6+ Kh8-g8 Qf6xe5 Re8xe5 Kc1-d2 Kg8-g7 Bd1-f3
17/47 00:06 23,329,664 3,876,000 +1.19 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 Be2-d1 Qc7-e7 Qf2xa7 Qe7-e4+ Kc2-c1 Qe4xd5 h2-h4 Qd5-e5 h5xg6 f7xg6 Qa7-f2 b7-b5 Qf2-f7+ Kg8-h8 Qf7-f6+ Kh8-g8 Qf6xe5 Re8xe5 Kc1-d2 Kg8-g7 Bd1-f3
18/47 00:07 27,964,786 3,921,000 +1.19 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 Be2-d1 Qc7-e7 Qf2xa7 Qe7-e4+ Kc2-c1 Qe4xd5 h2-h4 Qd5-e5 h5xg6 f7xg6 Qa7-f2 b7-b5 Qf2-f7+ Kg8-h8 Qf7-f6+ Kh8-g8 Qf6xe5 Re8xe5 Kc1-d2 Kg8-g7 Bd1-f3
19/52+ 00:10 42,875,280 3,974,000 +1.27 Bf1-d3
19/52 00:12 48,541,460 3,982,000 +1.24 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 Be2-d1 Qc7-e7 Qf2xa7 Qe7-e4+ Kc2-c1 Qe4xd5 h2-h4 Qd5-e5 h5xg6 h7xg6 Qa7-f2 Re8-e7 h4-h5 g6xh5 Rf1-h1 Qe5-g5+ Kc1-b1 Qg5-e3 Qf2-c2 Qe3-e4 Rh1-g1+ Kg8-f8 Bd1xh5
20/52+ 00:18 71,892,360 4,001,000 +1.32 Bf1-d3
20/52 00:20 80,719,252 4,008,000 +1.30 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 h2-h4 b7-b5 h5xg6 h7xg6 h4-h5 Qc7-e7 Be2-f3 Qe7-e5 h5xg6 f7xg6 Bf3-g2 Qe5-e7 Bg2-h3 Qe7-e2+ Kc2-c1 Qe2xf2 Rf1xf2 Kg8-g7 Bh3-e6 a7-a5 Rf2-f7+ Kg7-h6
21/52+ 00:29 118,404,377 3,976,000 +1.40 Bf1-d3
21/56+ 00:42 169,487,616 3,984,000 +1.61 Bf1-d3
21/61 01:22 334,556,021 4,057,000 +1.80 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-e8 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 Ra8-c8 b2-b3 c5-c4 b3xc4 b7-b5 Kc2-b3 b5xc4+ Bd3xc4 Qe8-e7 Qf2-d4 Qe7-b7+ Kb3-c3 Rc8-e8 Rf1-f4 Re8-b8 Bc4-b3 Rb8-e8 Qd4-f6 Re8-e3+ Kc3-c2 Re3-e2+ Kc2-d3 Re2xh2 h5xg6 h7xg6
22/61 01:59 486,537,700 4,088,000 +1.77 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 Kc2-d1 Re8-e4 Qf2-f6 Qc7-e7 Qf6xe7 Re4xe7 Be2xc4 Re7-e4 b2-b3 Re4-h4 h5xg6 h7xg6 Rf1-f6 Kg8-f8 Rf6-f2 f7-f5 Kd1-e2 Kf8-g7 Ke2-f3 Rh4-h3+ Kf3-g2 Rh3-e3 h2-h4 Kg7-f6
23/61 02:20 579,464,789 4,116,000 +1.77 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 Kc2-d1 Re8-e4 Qf2-f6 Qc7-e7 Qf6xe7 Re4xe7 Be2xc4 Re7-e4 b2-b3 Re4-h4 h5xg6 h7xg6 Rf1-f6 Kg8-f8 Rf6-f2 f7-f5 Kd1-c2 Kf8-e7 Bc4-f1 Rh4-e4 Bf1-g2 Re4-e3 Kc2-d2 Re3-e5 h2-h4
24/61 02:57 738,104,460 4,166,000 +1.77 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 Kc2-d1 Re8-e4 Qf2-f6 Qc7-e7 Qf6xe7 Re4xe7 Be2xc4 Re7-e4 b2-b3 Re4-h4 h5xg6 h7xg6 Rf1-f6 Kg8-f8 Rf6-f2 f7-f5 Kd1-c2 Kf8-e7 Bc4-f1 Rh4-e4 Bf1-g2 Re4-e3 Kc2-d2 Re3-e5 h2-h4
25/61 04:56 1,257,971,920 4,249,000 +1.78 Bf1-d3 Re8-e5 Rb1-f1 Qc6-c7 Nc3-d5 Re5xd5 c4xd5 c5-c4 Bd3-e2 Ra8-e8 Kc2-d1 Re8-e4 Qf2-f6 Qc7-e7 Qf6xe7 Re4xe7 Be2xc4 Re7-e4 b2-b3 Re4-h4 h5xg6 h7xg6 Rf1-f6 Kg8-f8 Rf6-f2 f7-f5 Kd1-c2 Kf8-e7 Bc4-f1 Rh4-e4 Rf2-e2 Re4xe2+ Bf1xe2 f5-f4 Kc2-d2 g6-g5
Uri Blass
Posts: 11219
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by Uri Blass »

Guenther wrote:
Strelkaman wrote:
I think Qf6 is a tactical mistake,QxRh1 is a blunder because you hung the queen.
We all know by now that Qf6 was a tactical mistake no need to repeat it,
as it was already said in the thread. Moreover Qxh1 was no blunder and does
not hang a Q it was just the consequence of Qf6, but White remains with a
lot of attacking power and by far better position. Still it seems Gelfand
resigned too early and was somehow shocked by Qf2...

Guenther
I believe that at the level of strong GM's white wins with probability of 99% after Qf2 even if black continues the game.

There are positions that computers evaluate as winning but humans have good chances to go wrong but it is not one of these positions because black has no attacking chances.
User avatar
Ajedrecista
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain.

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started.

Post by Ajedrecista »

Hello Lucas:
lucasart wrote:
Houdini wrote:[Event "World Chess Championship"]
[Site "Moscow"]
[Date "2012.05.21"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Anand, Viswanathan"]
[Black "Gelfand, Boris"]
[ECO "E60"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. f3 c5 4. d5 d6 5. e4 Bg7 6. Ne2 O-O
7. Nec3 Nh5 8. Bg5 Bf6 9. Bxf6 exf6 10. Qd2 f5 11. exf5
Bxf5 12. g4 Re8+ 13. Kd1 Bxb1 14. Rxb1 Qf6 15. gxh5 Qxf3+
16. Kc2 Qxh1 17. Qf2 1-0

[d]rn2r1k1/pp3p1p/3p2p1/2pP3P/2P5/2N5/PPK2Q1P/1R3B1q b - -
How about the defense: Nc6! dxc6 Qxc6 Bg2 Qd7 Nd5 Kf8 Nf6
[d]r3rk2/pp1q1p1p/3p1Np1/2p4P/2P5/8/PPK2QBP/1R6 b - -
That's not 1-0 yet ? White is better, but I (and my engine DiscoCheck) can't see any clearly winning continuation yet
At the end of your line, Quazar 0.4 w32 thinks this:

Code: Select all

info multipv 1 depth 22 time 328828 score cp -285 nodes 21726522 nps 66072 pv d7e6 c2d3 e8e7 b1g1 d6d5 g2d5 a8d8 f6h7 f8g7 h7g5 d8d5 c4d5 e6d5 d3c2 d5c4 c2b1 c4d3 b1a1 d3e2 f2c5 e2e1 c5c1 e1c1 g1c1 g6h5 a1b1 g7g6 g5f3 e7e3 c1c3 e3c3 b2c3 f7f5

info multipv 1 depth 23 time 510657 score cp -274 nodes 33515659 nps 65632 pv d7e6 c2d3 e8e7 b1g1 d6d5 g2d5 a8d8 f6h7 f8g7 h7g5 d8d5 c4d5 e6d5 d3c2 d5c4 c2b1 c4d3 b1a1 d3e2 f2c5 e2e1 c5c1 e1c1 g1c1 g6h5 a1b1 g7f6 h2h4 f6g6 c1g1 g6h6 g5f3

info multipv 1 depth 24 time 884438 score cp -300 nodes 58342701 nps 65965 pv d7e6 c2d3 e8e7 b1g1 e6e5 g2d5 f8g7 h5h6 g7h8 g1f1 a8d8 f6g4 e5d4 f2d4 c5d4 f1f7 e7f7 d5f7 d8f8 f7d5 b7b6 d5e4 f8f4 h2h3 h8g8 d3d4 g8f7 d4e3 f4f1 g4f2 f1a1 a2a3 a1a2
Quazar reminds me a lot to SF, but +3 for white should be enough at top level in this position; I am a patzer and I have not got the skill to evaluate it seriously. Good luck with DoubleCheck/DiscoCheck!

Regards from Spain.

Ajedrecista.
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by S.Taylor »

Guenther wrote:
Strelkaman wrote:
I think Qf6 is a tactical mistake,QxRh1 is a blunder because you hung the queen.
We all know by now that Qf6 was a tactical mistake no need to repeat it,
as it was already said in the thread. Moreover Qxh1 was no blunder and does
not hang a Q it was just the consequence of Qf6, but White remains with a
lot of attacking power and by far better position. Still it seems Gelfand
resigned too early and was somehow shocked by Qf2...

Guenther
If he only "miscalculated", he may have actually known that his queen would get trapped, but there was an oversight in some other detail.
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: Anand vs. Gelfand WCC 2012 started

Post by S.Taylor »

Uri Blass wrote:
Guenther wrote:
Strelkaman wrote:
I think Qf6 is a tactical mistake,QxRh1 is a blunder because you hung the queen.
We all know by now that Qf6 was a tactical mistake no need to repeat it,
as it was already said in the thread. Moreover Qxh1 was no blunder and does
not hang a Q it was just the consequence of Qf6, but White remains with a
lot of attacking power and by far better position. Still it seems Gelfand
resigned too early and was somehow shocked by Qf2...

Guenther
I believe that at the level of strong GM's white wins with probability of 99% after Qf2 even if black continues the game.
Not perhaps only 90% probability and he could have tried for a draw? (but had too much pride, as if to admit that such a mistake was acceptable for him)