Comparative test on w32 (Hannibal 1.4b/1.3)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Comparative test on w32 (Hannibal 1.4b/1.3)

Post by Sylwy »

Hello !

Conditions:

TC = 4'+2"
Hash = 128 MB
Book = Shredder12.ctg
GUI = Fritz 11
HIARCS 14 WCSC was linked to Nalimov TBs.

A nice progress !

SilvianR :wink:

Image

Image
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: The situation in my Gladiator 0.0.1 test

Post by Sylwy »

Image

A nice game of Gladiator:

Image

All in all a nice Java chess engine !

SilvianR :wink:
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: The evolution of w32 Arasan (15.6/16.0/16.1)

Post by Sylwy »

Hello !

Conditions:

TC = 4'+2"
Hash = 128 MB
Book = Shredder12.ctg
GUI = Fritz 11
Arasan was linked to Gaviota TBs.
Deep Sjeng 2.7 was linked to Nalimov TBs.

Regards,
SilvianR :wink:

Image

Image

Image
jdart
Posts: 4398
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Re: The evolution of w32 Arasan (15.6/16.0/16.1)

Post by jdart »

My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.

However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.

--Jon
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: Very good progress of EXchess w32 (7.18b/7.01b)

Post by Sylwy »

Hello !

Conditions:

TC = 4'+2"
Hash = 128 MB
Book = Shredder12.ctg
GUI = Fritz 11
EXchess 7.01b & 7.18b were linked to Nalimov TBs.
Deuterium 13.1.31.113 was linked to Scorpio egbbs.

Regards,
SilvianR :wink:

Image

Image
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: Nope ! Arasan 15.6 is the best !

Post by Sylwy »

jdart wrote:My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.

However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.

--Jon
Hello Maestro Jon !

CCRL (4/40) is on way to confirm my tests !

http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html

Arasan 15.6 x64..........................2813 ELO points

Arasan 16.1 x64..........................2719 ELO points

-94 ELO points

Testing at hyper-bullet time control is not a good idea. Just my opinion !

Regards,
SilvianR :wink:
Adam Hair
Posts: 3226
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina

Re: Nope ! Arasan 15.6 is the best !

Post by Adam Hair »

Sylwy wrote:
jdart wrote:My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.

However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.

--Jon
Hello Maestro Jon !

CCRL (4/40) is on way to confirm my tests !

http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html

Arasan 15.6 x64..........................2813 ELO points

Arasan 16.1 x64..........................2719 ELO points

-94 ELO points

Testing at hyper-bullet time control is not a good idea. Just my opinion !

Regards,
SilvianR :wink:
There are only 10 and 32 games played by the two versions your are comparing, so there is very little you can say about their relative strengths using the CCRL results.
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: I already specified

Post by Sylwy »

Adam Hair wrote:
Sylwy wrote:
jdart wrote:My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.

However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.

--Jon
Hello Maestro Jon !

CCRL (4/40) is on way to confirm my tests !

http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html

Arasan 15.6 x64..........................2813 ELO points

Arasan 16.1 x64..........................2719 ELO points

-94 ELO points

Testing at hyper-bullet time control is not a good idea. Just my opinion !

Regards,
SilvianR :wink:
There are only 10 and 32 games played by the two versions your are comparing, so there is very little you can say about their relative strengths using the CCRL results.
Hello Mod !

I already specified : "..........is on way............" .

Just waiting for the final result ! :lol:

Have a nice weekend !
SilvianR :wink:

Image
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: I already specified

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Sylwy wrote:
Adam Hair wrote:
Sylwy wrote:
jdart wrote:My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.

However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.

--Jon
Hello Maestro Jon !

CCRL (4/40) is on way to confirm my tests !

http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html

Arasan 15.6 x64..........................2813 ELO points

Arasan 16.1 x64..........................2719 ELO points

-94 ELO points

Testing at hyper-bullet time control is not a good idea. Just my opinion !

Regards,
SilvianR :wink:
There are only 10 and 32 games played by the two versions your are comparing, so there is very little you can say about their relative strengths using the CCRL results.
Hello Mod !

I already specified : "..........is on way............" .

Just waiting for the final result ! :lol:

Have a nice weekend !
SilvianR :wink:

Image
Just dropped by to say this:

I like you and like your style Silvian....
Give the computer chess scene hell as much as you can regards,
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: I already specified

Post by Sylwy »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
Just dropped by to say this:

I like you and like your style Silvian....
Give the computer chess scene hell as much as you can regards,
Dr.D
Thank you, my FRIEND !

Have a woderful weekend !

SilvianR :wink:

Image