Amoeba 2.1 64-bit Gauntlet for CCRL 40/40
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 41423
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Amoeba 2.1 64-bit Gauntlet for CCRL 40/40
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 41423
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Amoeba 2.1 64-bit Gauntlet for CCRL 40/40
Code: Select all
CCRL 40/40 Rating List - Custom engine selection
693335 games played by 1834 programs, run by 19 testers
Ponder off, General books (up to 12 moves), 3-4-5 piece EGTB
Time control: Equivalent to 40 moves in 40 minutes on Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (2.4 GHz), about 15 minutes on a modern Intel CPU.
Computed on February 25, 2017 with Bayeselo based on 693'335 games
Tested by CCRL team, 2005-2017, http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/
Rank Engine Elo + - Score AvOp Games
1 Amoeba 2.0 64-bit 2729 +29 -29 45.0% +30.2 372
Amoeba 2.1 64-bit 2707 +33 -33 46.3% +25.1 294
Amoeba 1.4 64-bit 2706 +27 -27 46.1% +27.6 451
Amoeba 1.3 64-bit 2692 +33 -33 48.5% +9.4 298
Amoeba 1.2 64-bit 2611 +31 -31 56.1% -41.2 335
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:04 am
- Location: France
- Full name: Richard Delorme
Re: Amoeba 2.1 64-bit Gauntlet for CCRL 40/40
Code: Select all
Rank Engine Elo + - Score AvOp Games
1 Amoeba 2.0 64-bit 2729 +29 -29 45.0% +30.2 372
Amoeba 2.1 64-bit 2707 +33 -33 46.3% +25.1 294
Amoeba 1.4 64-bit 2706 +27 -27 46.1% +27.6 451
On my own "long" time tests (with times similar to your 40/5, not 40/40), I do not observe a regression for the 2.1 version. It is possible that amoeba 2.1 does not scale well. Whatever, I shall try to release next versions with a higher elo gap, so that everybody can observe a progression. As until now I only corrected a few bugs with little elo impact, not sure this will happens in version 2.2 though.
Richard Delorme