CEGT - rating lists April 01st 2012

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2871
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

CEGT - rating lists April 01st 2012

Post by Werner »

Hi all, :D

our actual rating lists are online and can be found under the attached links.

40 / 20:
New games: 1767 ; 37 different engines
Total: 580.360

NEW Engines
386 Texel 1.01 x64: 2649 - 1073 games (+199 to CuckooChess 1.12!)
544 Dirty 23Mar2012: 2532 - 694 games (+14 to prev. version here)

UPDATES
...not much differences:
597 Arasan 14.0 x64 1CPU: 2494 - 1048 games (+2 now in front of version 13.4)
624 Arasan 13.4 x64 1CPU: 2483 - 898 games (+-0)
646 RedQueen 1.1.1 x64 1CPU: 2472 - 656 games (still -22 to version 1.0.0 here; in our blitz-lists the engines are equal)

40 / 4:
no updates this week!

40/120
See here our new single-list (with 7350 games):
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn//40120n ... liste.html

40/20 pb=on
Our new list raises fast. We now have made 3400 games.
New entries are Fritz 12/13: Chiron 1.1a; Critter 1.4 x64; Stockfish 2.2.2 x64. Next engine will be Spark 1.0 x64.
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating4020PBON.htm
A big „Thank you“ to all testers as usual!!

Links

40/20: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating.htm
Blitz: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/blitz.htm
40/120: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating120.htm
Tester: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/testers/testers.htm
40/20 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating4020PBON.htm
Games of the week: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40_40%2 ... on/gow.jpg

Werner Schuele
CEGT-Team
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: CEGT - rating scrolls April 01st 2012

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Naughty 23Mar2012 :!: :?:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
UncombedCoconut
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:40 am
Location: Naperville, IL

Re: CEGT - rating scrolls April 01st 2012

Post by UncombedCoconut »

Yes, by Pradu Kannan, Fonzy Bluemers & Andres Valverde. :)
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: CEGT - rating scrolls April 01st 2012

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

UncombedCoconut wrote:Yes, by Pradu Kannan, Fonzy Bluemers & Andres Valverde. :)
:lol:

:wink:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
petero2
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:07 pm
Location: Sweden
Full name: Peter Osterlund

Re: CEGT - rating lists April 01st 2012

Post by petero2 »

Werner wrote:NEW Engines
386 Texel 1.01 x64: 2649 - 1073 games (+199 to CuckooChess 1.12!)

40/20: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating.htm
Hi Werner,

I am of course very happy with the Texel performance. Just a question: Was CuckooChess 1.12 using a 64-bit Java virtual machine? In my (very limited) tests, CuckooChess is about 90% faster in 64-bit mode compared to 32-bit mode.
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2871
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

Re: CEGT - rating lists April 01st 2012

Post by Werner »

Hi Peter,
i was using these files:
start.bat 37 15.01.2012 15:30 -a--
cuckoochess112.exe 344.414 27.10.2011 13:28 -a--
readme.pdf 142.111 26.10.2011 00:22 -a--
cuckoo112.jar 320.862 26.10.2011 00:07 -a--
logo.bmp 9.658 13.01.2010 23:52 -a--

cuckoochess was 32bit and java.exe has 32bit - and the pc has 64 bit windows 7. I do not have java 64 bit (I think it was an automatical installation).

Werner
User avatar
Andres Valverde
Posts: 557
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 11:07 pm
Location: Almeria. SPAIN

Re: CEGT - rating lists April 01st 2012

Post by Andres Valverde »

Werner wrote: 544 Dirty 23Mar2012: 2532 - 694 games (+14 to prev. version here)

Werner Schuele
CEGT-Team
Thanks a lot , that was fast !. We expected some more ELOs but at least it is not worse :P
Saludos, Andres