TalkChess.com :: View topic - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Results

TalkChess.com
Hosted by Your Move Chess & Games

FAQ

Memberlist

Usergroups

Profile

Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Results
Goto page 1, 2 Next

TalkChess.com Forum Index -> Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

Brent M

Joined: 10 Mar 2012
Posts: 142
Location: USA

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 12:02 pm Post subject: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Results

http://atomicc-testing.blogspot.com/2012/05/houdini-20c-pro-x64-vitruvius-111c-hem.html _________________ Happy chessing!

Gabriel LEPERLIER

Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 936

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 12:34 pm Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Thanks Brent

Jon Dart

Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1721
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 8:32 pm Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

from game 36:

[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!

--Jon

Gabriel LEPERLIER

Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 936

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 8:57 pm Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

jdart wrote:

from game 36:

[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!

--Jon

Indeed !

[D]r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - - 0 1

Analysis by HIARCS 13.2 MP:

1...Cxh4 2.gxh4 Tg4 3.Dh2 Df6 4.Fe2 Txh4 5.Fxh5 Txh2+
-+ (-2.27) Profondeur: 20/62 00:01:33 178mN
(Doe, 24.05.2012)

Dr.Wael Deeb

Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 8618
Location: Amman,Jordan

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

jdart wrote:

from game 36:

[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!

--Jon

Absolutely....It wins the game in a fashionable way Very Happy

_________________
It ain't about how hard you can hit,it's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward,how much you can take and keep moving forward.

Brent M

Joined: 10 Mar 2012
Posts: 142
Location: USA

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:50 pm Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

jdart wrote:

from game 36:

[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!

--Jon

How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it? Smile

_________________
Happy chessing!

Jon Dart

Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1721
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:55 pm Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Quote:

How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?

I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?

--Jon

Marcel van Kervinck

Joined: 26 Feb 2010
Posts: 348

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 11:26 pm Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

jdart wrote:

Quote:

How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?

I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?

--Jon

Very nice position, a very nice tactic! My program has a lot of trouble with it (on my laptop, 1 core:)

Code:

time ply score variation
1.6 13 -0.327 Ne7, Bb7 Rxg3, Bxa8 Rh3+, Kg2 Rxh4, Kg3 Ng6, Qe1 Rg4+, Kh3 Nxf4+, Kh2 e3, Rd1
5.6 14 -0.206 Ne7, Qe1 Rg4, Rg2 Bf2, Qxf2 Rxa6, b3 Nxd5, Qd4 Ra5, b4 Rb5, Kg1
7.9 15 -0.061 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Rg2 Rag8, c4 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rf3 Bd4, Ra3 Qf6, Kh2 Rg4
11.4 16 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Rg2 Rag8, c4 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
16.6 17 -0.088 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Rh2 Nxf4, gxf4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rf2 Qg4+, Kf1
21.1 18 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
33.4 19 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
277.3 20 +0.853 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Re2 Qg4+, Kf1 Qxh4, Nc3 Qh1+, Kf2 Qf3+, Ke1 e3, Kd1 h4
317.3 21 +0.712 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 Qf6, Kh1 Qd4, Nc3 Qxc5, Rg5 h4, Rxf5
425.0 22 +0.771 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 e3, Nc3 dxc5, Be2 Qd4, a4 h4, Kh2
724.3 23 +0.946 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 e3, Nc3 dxc5, Be2 Qd4, a4 Kh6, Kh2 c4
2606.4 24 +2.678 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg3, Qh2 Rag8, c4 Qf6, Bc8 R3g4, Bd7 Kh8, b4 Rxh4, b5 Rb8, c5 dxc5, Rg1 Rg8, b6 Rxh2+, Rxh2 Rxg1+, Kxg1 Qa1+, Kg2 Qxa2+, Kg3
3318.3 25 +2.873 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg3, Qh2 Rag8, c4 Qf6, c5 R8g4, c6 Rxh4, Nc3 Bb6, a4 Kg6, Rg2 Rxg2, Qxh4 Qxh4+, Kxg2 Qg4+, Kh2 h4, Ne2 h3, Ng3 e3

kgburcham

Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 1309

Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:46 am Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

jdart wrote:

Quote:

How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?

I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?
--Jon

small hardware
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Houdini

17/53 0:01 -1.95++ 1...Nxh4 (21.512.339) 14284
17/60 0:03 -2.58 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (49.667.690) 14455
18/60 0:04 -2.72++ 1...Nxh4 (58.847.598) 14577
18/60 0:05 -2.99++ 1...Nxh4 (80.000.512) 14861
18/62 0:07 -3.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (116.194.994) 14987
19/66 0:10 -3.43++ 1...Nxh4 (158.167.336) 15079
19/66 0:12 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (196.444.412) 15126
20/66 0:14 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (222.677.479) 15196
21/66 0:22 -3.68++ 1...Nxh4 (350.936.509) 15310
21/67 0:34 -4.03++ 1...Nxh4 (535.317.923) 15312
21/75 0:50 -4.06 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (768.109.865) 15337
22/75 1:04 -4.26++ 1...Nxh4 (989.298.656) 15356
22/75 1:16 -4.16 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.177.234.441) 15379
23/75 1:37 -4.36++ 1...Nxh4 (1.511.143.523) 15465
23/76 1:47 -4.36 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.660.527.262) 15485

Rybka

14.05 0:02 +0.11++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.b4 Rg1+
14.01 0:03 -0.29++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (1.738.527) 548
14.01 0:06 -1.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.c4 Rg1+ 5.Kh2 Rxf1 (3.409.014) 546
14.01 0:12 -1.84 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 5.Qxh4 Qxh4+ (6.857.259) 552
15.01 0:15 -1.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 (8.499.899) 565
15.01 0:15 -1.96 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (8.767.993) 566
16.01 0:18 -2.08++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (10.825.029) 586
16.01 0:22 -2.15 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (13.608.027) 604
17.01 0:29 -2.27++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (18.352.545) 626
17.01 0:36 -2.42++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (23.512.053) 643
17.01 0:46 -2.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (29.308.296) 631
18.01 0:50 -2.39++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (32.409.037) 637
18.01 1:01 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (40.018.955) 648
18.01 1:06 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (43.116.544) 649

Critter

15/45 0:01 -2.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (9.278.043) 5868
15/48 0:02 -1.98 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (12.693.332) 6318
16/48 0:02 -2.10++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (15.603.714) 6898
16/48 0:02 -2.22++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (18.395.188) 7375
16/48 0:02 -2.40++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (21.362.315) 7790
16/48 0:02 -2.33 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (22.991.002) 7846
17/48 0:03 -2.48++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (31.110.104) 8692
17/48 0:04 -2.62++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (39.277.488) 9172
17/50 0:04 -2.19-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (45.826.148) 9481
17/60 0:04 -2.04-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (46.142.084) 9455
17/63 0:05 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (54.274.023) 9536
18/63 0:06 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (63.379.695) 9890
19/63 0:09 -2.79 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (102.409.340) 10901
20/63 0:16 -2.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (189.106.051) 11773
20/63 0:22 -3.13++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (274.198.569) 12101

Dr.Wael Deeb

Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 8618
Location: Amman,Jordan

Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:05 am Post subject: Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

kgburcham wrote:

jdart wrote:

Quote:

How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?

I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?
--Jon

small hardware
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

The chess engines are real monsters Shocked

_________________
It ain't about how hard you can hit,it's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward,how much you can take and keep moving forward.

Display posts from previous:

	TalkChess.com Forum Index -> Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches	All times are GMT Goto page 1, 2 Next
Page 1 of 2

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum