| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Clemens Keck
Joined: 01 Dec 2009 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:31 am Post subject: testTour |
|
|
Hi All
I am planing a bigger engine tournament with longer time controlls.
To see what book(s) I could use I am running a test tournament.
It is just 10 +10 time, but you can see in the replayzone that the game quality is still high.
All engines 4 cpu ponder ON. 2 games running at the same time. More information at my webpage.
enjoy
regards, Clemens Keck
http://www.clemens-keck.de/base.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jouni Uski
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1166
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:00 am Post subject: Re: testTour |
|
|
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 T4 is still strong with longer time control! _________________ Jouni |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jouni Uski
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1166
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:24 am Post subject: Re: testTour |
|
|
1 Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 T4 26.5 / 34
2 Houdini 2.0c x64 T4 23.0 / 34
3 Stockfish 2.2.2 x64 T4 20.5 / 34
4 Critter 1.6 64-bit T4 20 / 34
5 Naum 4.2 T4 17 / 36
6 Deep Shredder 12 x64 T4 14.0 / 35
7 HIARCS 13.2 MP T4 12.5 / 36
8 Deep Junior 13 T4 12.0 / 36
9 Deep Fritz 13 11.5 / 35 _________________ Jouni |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sedat Canbaz
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1385 Location: Antalya/Turkey
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:17 am Post subject: Re: testTour |
|
|
| Jouni wrote: |
| Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 T4 is still strong with longer time control! |
Interesting tournament,many thanks to Clemens
Agreed that Deep Rybka 4.1 performs better than the bullet time controls
Especially Rybka 32-bit's performance is lower than Rybka 64-bit
But anyway,there are just only 34 games per player,i think the standings will be changed after more games
For example,you can see Rybka 4.1's performance here:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/scct-auto232/
Best,
Sedat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clemens Keck
Joined: 01 Dec 2009 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:31 pm Post subject: Re: testTour |
|
|
Hello
here are 2 intresting games with verry quick wins:
[Event "HS-Trophy_1"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2012.06.26"]
[Round "3.7"]
[White "Deep Junior 13 T4"]
[Black "Houdini 2.0c x64 T4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B41"]
[Annotator "0.10;0.03"]
[PlyCount "63"]
[EventDate "2012.06.24"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[Source "Doe"]
[TimeControl "600+10"]
{Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2687W 0 @ 3.10GHz 3099 MHz W=18.9 plies; 8.349kN/s;
HS-Masterbook1.1.ctg B=20.8 plies; 9.139kN/s; HS-Masterbook1.1.ctg} 1. e4 {
B/0 0} c5 {B/0 0} 2. Nf3 {B/0 0} e6 {B/0 0} 3. c4 {B/0 0} a6 {B/0 0} 4. d4 {
B/0 0} cxd4 {B/0 0} 5. Nxd4 {B/0 0} Nf6 {B/0 0} 6. Nc3 {B/0 0} Bb4 {B/0 0} 7.
Bd3 {0.10/19 52} Qc7 {(Sc6) 0.03/22 73} 8. O-O {0.25/17 16} Bxc3 {
(Sc6) 0.01/22 49} 9. bxc3 {0.40/18 14} d6 {0.02/23 103} 10. Ba3 {
(Lg5) 0.32/20 0} e5 {(0-0) 0.03/23 60} 11. Nf5 {(Sc2) 0.24/19 12} Bxf5 {
-0.01/21 4} 12. exf5 {0.32/18 5} Nbd7 {-0.02/23 18} 13. Rb1 {(Lc2) 0.29/19 0}
O-O {(0-0-0) -0.03/24 47} 14. g4 {(Lc2) 0.57/19 18} h6 {(Dc6) -0.05/22 18} 15.
h4 {0.48/21 50} e4 {(Sc5) 0.01/24 0} 16. Be2 {0.52/20 30} Nc5 {0.01/22 0} 17.
g5 {(Dd4) 0.45/20 68} hxg5 {0.04/21 18} 18. hxg5 {0.62/19 22} Nh7 {
(Sfd7) 0.11/21 10} 19. Bc1 {0.55/20 55} Rfe8 {(De7) 0.18/22 27} 20. Be3 {
(Lf4) 0.67/19 28} Re5 {0.19/19 28} 21. Bg4 {0.59/19 0} Qe7 {(Tae8) 0.09/21 28}
22. Qd2 {0.71/20 31} Nd3 {0.23/22 9} 23. a4 {(Tb6) 0.69/19 9} Rb8 {
(Ta5) 0.04/20 25} 24. Rfd1 {0.66/17 11} Ra5 {(d5) 0.08/19 17} 25. f4 {
(Le2) 0.74/18 10} Rxa4 {0.67/19 67} 26. Qh2 {(Dg2) 1.67/18 18} Rxc4 {1.59/18 61
} 27. Rd2 {2.51/21 0} Nf6 {3.82/19 57} 28. gxf6 {4.45/19 54} Qxf6 {6.03/18 6}
29. Qh1 {5.31/21 149} Nf2 {(g6) 7.30/19 0} 30. Kxf2 {(Lxf2) 5.76/15 3} Rxc3 {
(Tbc8) 6.85/17 16} 31. Qh5 {(Dxe4) 6.21/16 2} Rbc8 {(Td8) 8.09/18 15} 32. Rh1 {
6.94/19 9} 1-0
[Event "Power-Trophy_1-1"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2012.06.26"]
[Round "2.8"]
[White "HIARCS 13.2 MP T4"]
[Black "Deep Shredder 12 x64 T4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A13"]
[Annotator "-0.67;-0.42"]
[PlyCount "77"]
[EventDate "2012.06.24"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[Source "Doe"]
[TimeControl "600+10"]
{Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2687W 0 @ 3.10GHz 3100 MHz W=20.1 plies; 2.408kN/s;
82.611 TBAs; Powerbook2012.ctg B=19.8 plies; 3.086kN/s; 3.316.384 TBAs;
Powerbook2012.ctg} 1. c4 {B/0 0} c5 {B/0 0} 2. b3 {B/0 0} Nc6 {B/0 0} 3. Nf3 {
B/0 0} e6 {B/0 0} 4. Bb2 {B/0 0} d5 {B/0 0} 5. e3 {B/0 0} Nf6 {B/0 0} 6. g3 {
B/0 0} Bd6 {B/0 0} 7. d4 {-0.67/17 73} cxd4 {-0.42/17 31} 8. exd4 {
(Sxd4) -0.77/17 12} dxc4 {(0-0) -0.36/18 87} 9. Bxc4 {-0.80/18 30} O-O {
(a6) -0.32/19 4} 10. O-O {-0.64/18 27} a6 {(b6) -0.21/18 17} 11. Ne5 {
(Le2) -0.66/19 33} Qc7 {(Sb4) -0.13/18 37} 12. Nxc6 {-0.54/18 22} Qxc6 {
-0.12/19 0} 13. Be2 {-0.56/19 28} Qc7 {(Dd7) -0.09/19 4} 14. Bf3 {-0.42/19 26}
Bd7 {-0.14/19 0} 15. Nd2 {-0.37/19 28} Bc6 {(Sd5) -0.11/20 9} 16. Rc1 {
-0.42/19 25} Bxf3 {-0.18/19 15} 17. Qxf3 {-0.36/20 0} Qd7 {-0.13/20 34} 18. Nc4
{-0.38/21 0} Nd5 {-0.13/20 33} 19. Ne3 {-0.38/20 0} Be7 {(Db5) -0.11/18 41} 20.
Nxd5 {-0.33/18 19} exd5 {-0.11/19 1} 21. Rfe1 {(a4) -0.32/19 20} Rac8 {
(Tfc8) -0.11/17 9} 22. Re5 {-0.28/20 24} Rxc1+ {-0.13/20 0} 23. Bxc1 {
-0.28/19 4} Rd8 {-0.07/19 29} 24. Re2 {(Dd3) -0.25/20 0} Rc8 {0.00/19 79} 25.
Bf4 {-0.18/24 0} Bf6 {(f6) 0.00/19 45} 26. h4 {(Le5) -0.10/19 22} h6 {
(Le7) 0.00/18 25} 27. Bxh6 {(Le5) -0.04/19 29} Bxd4 {0.00/17 9} 28. Bg5 {
0.00/20 12} Rc3 {-0.04/19 50} 29. Qf4 {0.03/23 0} Bc5 {0.00/18 20} 30. Qe5 {
0.00/21 0} Qc8 {(Td3) -0.02/18 20} 31. Be3 {0.08/20 49} Bxe3 {-0.02/21 0} 32.
Rxe3 {0.07/21 27} Rxe3 {-0.01/20 0} 33. Qxe3 {(fxe3) 0.06/22 27} Qe6 {
(f6) 0.00/20 29} 34. Kg2 {(a4) 0.21/20 27} b5 {0.00/20 16} 35. Qxe6 {
(Dd4) 0.10/21 40} fxe6 {1.94/29 44} 36. f4 {0.89/23 22} Kf7 {(g6) 9.73/28 180}
37. g4 {(h5) 2.11/23 24} Kf6 {8.50/27 66} 38. h5 {3.08/24 0} d4 {
(Kf7) 8.11/19 9} 39. Kf3 {8.22/20 27} 1-0
regards, Clemens |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gabriel LEPERLIER

Joined: 04 Feb 2012 Posts: 936
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:12 pm Post subject: Re: testTour |
|
|
| Nice tournament Clemens ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clemens Keck
Joined: 01 Dec 2009 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:50 pm Post subject: Re: testTour |
|
|
| Hugo wrote: |
Hi All
I am planing a bigger engine tournament with longer time controlls.
To see what book(s) I could use I am running a test tournament.
It is just 10 +10 time, but you can see in the replayzone that the game quality is still high.
All engines 4 cpu ponder ON. 2 games running at the same time. More information at my webpage.
enjoy
regards, Clemens Keck
http://www.clemens-keck.de/base.htm |
The tournament is finnished
finally Houdini won, but Rybka 4.1 reached the same score!..
Informations on my webPage
Regards, Clemens Keck
PS: New tour is in progress. Top 4 engines with 8 cores each engine and ponder ON !
cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|