Any summary of Fabien's open letter discussion?

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Osipov Jury
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Russia

Re: Any summary of Fabien's open letter discussion?

Post by Osipov Jury »

gerold wrote: Where does Streka R-3e come from.

Best,
Gerold.
Strelka R3E come from Strelka 2.0B + Rybka 3 evaluation function.
"R3E" means: "Rybka 3 Evaluation".
I went through the Rybka code forwards and backwards and took many things.
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: Any summary of Fabien's open letter discussion?

Post by gerold »

Osipov Jury wrote:
gerold wrote: Where does Streka R-3e come from.

Best,
Gerold.
Strelka R3E come from Strelka 2.0B + Rybka 3 evaluation function.
"R3E" means: "Rybka 3 Evaluation".
Thanks for the reply and engine.

Best,
Gerold.
User avatar
Rolf
Posts: 6081
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:14 pm
Location: Munster, Nuremberg, Princeton

Re: Any summary of Fabien's open letter discussion?

Post by Rolf »

Osipov Jury wrote:Strelka is both a clone of Fruit and Rybka. But this does not mean that Rybka is a clone or derivative of Fruit. Although Rybka has a lot of matches with Fruit.
So, could I quote you in future in debates if it is always repeated that Zach had all on his webpage, that Rybka 1 sure were out of Fruit because of all the chunks etc, that you as programmer made a negative verdict about such a theory? And this isnt just your opinion but you are damned certain? No court would come to a different conclusion? Well, this is in my words what Vas was always telling them. I always thought that you were against Rybka and Vas because you published the code of Strelka so that others could see now all the details of Rybka too. Please I dont want to begin a new debate, just these questions. Thanks.
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 6808
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: Any summary of Fabien's open letter discussion?

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Hi there,

*** EASY ***

Summary 1:

1. the community have a lot of spirits.
2. all the spirits have different opinions to the same topic.
3. each one have right.

Summary 2:
The result of combination from "Summary 1 points 1-3" will be:

TalkChess LIVE

Best
Frank

Kann mich noch erinnern an ein Protokoll was ich mal bei 700 anwesenden Personen führen sollte. Die Sitzung ging 5 Stunden.

In meinem Protokoll stand:
Es wurde viel dummes Zeug geredet wobei kein nennenswertes Resultat dabei herauskam. Als ich das am Ende der Sitzung vorlas und sämtliche Klappen nach unten gefallen sind verließ ich den Raum und ging ich in die Pizzeria um die Ecke. Ich machte an diesem Tag das erste mal etwas wirklich vernünftiges. Ich kaufte mir eine leckere Salami Pizza und dachte mir: Diese Leute lässt Du am besten mir Ihren Problemen mal ganz allein.