Osipov Jury wrote:Strelka is both a clone of Fruit and Rybka. But this does not mean that Rybka is a clone or derivative of Fruit. Although Rybka has a lot of matches with Fruit.
So, could I quote you in future in debates if it is always repeated that Zach had all on his webpage, that Rybka 1 sure were out of Fruit because of all the chunks etc, that you as programmer made a negative verdict about such a theory? And this isnt just your opinion but you are damned certain? No court would come to a different conclusion? Well, this is in my words what Vas was always telling them. I always thought that you were against Rybka and Vas because you published the code of Strelka so that others could see now all the details of Rybka too. Please I dont want to begin a new debate, just these questions. Thanks.
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
1. the community have a lot of spirits.
2. all the spirits have different opinions to the same topic.
3. each one have right.
Summary 2:
The result of combination from "Summary 1 points 1-3" will be:
TalkChess LIVE
Best
Frank
Kann mich noch erinnern an ein Protokoll was ich mal bei 700 anwesenden Personen führen sollte. Die Sitzung ging 5 Stunden.
In meinem Protokoll stand:
Es wurde viel dummes Zeug geredet wobei kein nennenswertes Resultat dabei herauskam. Als ich das am Ende der Sitzung vorlas und sämtliche Klappen nach unten gefallen sind verließ ich den Raum und ging ich in die Pizzeria um die Ecke. Ich machte an diesem Tag das erste mal etwas wirklich vernünftiges. Ich kaufte mir eine leckere Salami Pizza und dachte mir: Diese Leute lässt Du am besten mir Ihren Problemen mal ganz allein.