I'm not looking to hang anyone, I want to have a better sense of what happened and what was said and who said it, i.e. the programmers who have already hung up their hats or the ones who currently have active strong programs?marcelk wrote:The meeting was not secret. The reason I don't feel it correct to mention names without consent is because if those programmers want to have their head of chopped off in this forum like me they are free to post here by themselves, and second because discussing persons instead of ideas is not what I'm interested in.Don wrote:Ok, so the meeting was secret. I was just asking. But if it was secret then it's not fair to just spit out the parts that you want heard. So some of it was secret and some wasn't, and you will decide?marcelk wrote: Re Don's question who of the participants suggested the discussion of an 'added value' rule set,
in public I can only remark that it was suggested by some of the top entrants and not by me.
The problem is that if you have someone obviously in favor of an idea reporting on the same idea you are not likely to get an objective report.