| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tom Casanovas
Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 342
|
Post subject: Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:16 am |
|
|
201202Stockfish221Ofry(x6b)-1 2012
I7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores GUI
Stockfish NO SSE
Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012
Time control: 2 min + 2 sec/ game.
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx6 - Critter 1.4a 64-bit SSE4(x6) 10.5 - 9.5 +2/=17/-1 52.50%
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx6 - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 (x6) 10.0 - 10.0 +5/=10/-5 50.00%
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx6 - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64(x6) 7.0 - 13.0 +5/=4/-11 35.00%
60 GAMES: mediafire.com 4js7jlhnjtt29wn
201202Stock221Offryb-1 2012
i7 9750 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Stockfish NO SSE
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Masterbook 3.1
Time control: 2MIN + 2 SEC/game.
Ponder: Off.
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx4 - Critter 1.4 64-bit SSE4(x4) 11.5 - 8.5 +6/=11/-3 57.50%
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx4 - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64(x4) 9.0 - 11.0 +3/=12/-5 45.00%
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx4 - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64(x4) 9.0 - 11.0 +5/=8/-7 45.00%
60 GAMES: mediafire.com xaajkes43ou1dbe
GLOBAL RESULTS 120 GAMES AT 2 MIN + 2 SEC /GAME:
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx6 - Critter 1.4 64-bit SSE4 22.0 – 18.0 +8/=28/-4 55.00%
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx6 - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 19.0 - 21.0 +8/=22/-10 47.50%
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bitx6 - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 16.0 - 24.0 +10/=12-18 40.00%
ONLY AS A COMPARISON, HERE YOU HAVE THE SAME TEST WITH 120 GAMES AT 5 MINUTES/GAME TIME CONTROL
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bit - Critter 1.4a 64-bit SSE4 16.5 - 23.5 +6/=21/-13 41.25%
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bit - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 20.0 - 20.0 +7/=26/-7 50.00%
Stockfish 2.2.1 ofry 64bit - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 13.5 - 26.5 +4/=19/-17 33.75%
The performance of this compile is much better with incremental time control.
Regards from Barcelona.
Tom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:42 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:16 am |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
George Speight |
Mon Feb 13, 2012 6:23 am |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:34 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:10 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:45 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:58 am |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:53 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Gary |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:20 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:55 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:12 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Gary |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:15 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:13 am |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:12 am |
A very strong AMD compile. |
Tom Casanovas |
Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:33 am |
Re: A very strong AMD compile. |
Tom Glenn |
Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:23 pm |
Re: A very strong AMD compile. |
Tom Casanovas |
Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:31 pm |
Re: A very strong AMD compile. |
Ernest Bonnem |
Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:56 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|