| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jesús Muñoz

Joined: 13 Jul 2011 Posts: 690 Location: Madrid, Spain.
|
Post subject: Doubt: perft estimate averaging N MonteCarlo samples. Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:27 pm |
|
|
Hello:
I have been thinking about an idea that will be surely clumsy: using 'perftmc' command of GNU 5.07.173b (which gives different values in each try), could I do a good estimate averaging results? Here is a typical output:
| Code: |
m=6.188431e+019 sd=5.191844e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187093e+019,6.189768e+019] n=2001154
971 sdn=2.322533e+020 t=37391.12s |
It is an example of MonteCarlo Perft(14) for the initial position of standard chess. I thought about using NebiyuChess 1.42, which automatically interrupts MonteCarlo Perft at 5e+8 nodes more less... but always gives the same results in different tries, so I discarded it. This is the reason why I thought about GNU.
My question is the following: if I run N MonteCarlo samples of the same position and I stop all of them at the same point (with the same number of nodes ± a very little amount), can I average the results in this way?
| Code: |
m_1, m_2, ..., m_N
(Average m) = <m> = (1/N)·(m_1 + m_2 + ... + m_N)
sd_1, sd_2, ... sd_N
(Average standard deviation) = <sd> = sqrt{(1/N)·[(sd_1)² + (sd_2)² + ... + (sd_N)²]} |
Or, taking into account that different samples have different number of nodes:
| Code: |
<m> = [(n_1)·(m_1) + (n_2)·(m_2) + ... + (n_N)·(m_N)]/(n_1 + n_2 + ... n_N)
<sd> = sqrt{[(sdn_1)² + (sdn_2)² + ... + (sdn_N)²]/(n_1 + n_2 + ... n_N)} |
Where sdn_i = (sd_i)·sqrt(n_i) and GNU prints these numbers. I think that n_i ~ 1e+8 or 5e+8 nodes in each sample is accurate enough, but comments are welcome.
Are my assumptions correct or I have failure concepts? In the case that I am right (very unlikely), the estimate would be good/accurate or is it a waste of time because of the size of the standard deviation (or other issues)? Thanks in advance.
Regards from Spain.
Ajedrecita. _________________ Six Fortran 95 tools.
Chess will never be solved. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Doubt: perft estimate averaging N MonteCarlo samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:27 pm |
Re: Doubt: perft estimate averaging N MonteCarlo samples. |
Daniel Shawul |
Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:31 pm |
Averages with 27 MonteCarlo samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:35 pm |
Perft(14) estimate after averaging 54 MC perft samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:27 pm |
Some explanations. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:09 pm |
Perft(14) estimate after averaging 96 MC perft samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:44 pm |
Perft(14) estimate after averaging 120 MC perft samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Fri Feb 17, 2012 8:00 pm |
Perft(14) estimate after averaging 174 MC perft samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:26 pm |
Perft(14) estimate after averaging 222 MC perft samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:50 pm |
Perft(14) estimate after averaging 270 MC perft samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:57 pm |
Perft(14) estimate after averaging 315 MC perft samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:22 pm |
Perft(14) estimate after averaging 387 MC perft samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:11 pm |
Final Perft(14) estimate after averaging 400 MC samples. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:21 pm |
Re: Final Perft(14) estimate after averaging 400 MC samples. |
Peter Österlund |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:24 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|