| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ted Wong

Joined: 01 Nov 2010 Posts: 236
|
Post subject: Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:43 am |
|
|
Well if Winboard protocol is really better than UCI, why wouldn't the top and new engines use it? Its not as common as UCI, there must be a reason. Can you explain?
| hgm wrote: |
| Christopher Conkie wrote: |
Arena is a supporter of the UCI protocol but we also support older, more archaic protocols.
For example......we have been waiting upon Winboard 3 for some time now.
|
You are waiting for archaic protocols that still have to be developed?
Why are you waiting? That doesn't seem a good way to make fast progress. Especially when you are waiting for things that are not scheduled to happen... If there are WB protocol features you need for proper Arena functioning, which are currently not implemented, you can propose them, and if thet are not very ridiculous, they will likely be added within the week...
That is actually the major advantage of WB protocol over UCI: it is a living protocol, that can be extended in any direction, to meet novel demands. UCI, OTOH, is static and unchangeable. It is basically a dead protocol, tailored to meet the needs of a single engine and a single GUI.
| Quote: |
A brief but simplified understanding may look like this......
UCI is simple to implement. Winboard, more difficult.
UCI is extensible, Winboard less so (until otherwise advised)
Winboard caters for older engines (UCI is relatively new)
Winboard has been customised for variant chess, UCI less so.
Winboard is more stringent, UCI less so.
|
Not sure what you mean by the 'extensible' thing. I would say it is just the other thing around. The only attempt to extend UCI I am aware of is UCI3 by Rybka, and they did so far not manage to get that extension in the UCI protocol specs, so that no one supports it. The WB protocol specs, however, are updated all the time with new extensions. WB protocol is of course more flexible, in this respect, because it incorporates a formalized mechanism for extending the protocol without breaking backward compatibility, through the 'feature' handshaking at engine startup.
This is a pity, because extensions of UCI are sorely needed. There are so many things you cannot do in UCI that have been standard in WB protocol for decades.
I'm also not sure what you mean by 'stringent'. Can you give an example?
| Quote: |
I think the only people qualified to answer your question are those who have implemented both.
You might want to ask the Greko author for example.
|
Remind me, what GUI did he implement?
| Quote: |
He could tell you the pro's and con's of what he found.
Better still.....implement them both. In that way you will be "backward compatible".
|
Yeah, and do twice the work... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Asim Pereira |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:28 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Ted Wong |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:26 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Asim Pereira |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:39 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Ted Wong |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:14 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:32 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:27 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Aart Bik |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:54 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:17 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:55 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:57 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Matthias Gemuh |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:04 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:48 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Matthias Gemuh |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:14 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:10 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:19 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Evert Glebbeek |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:25 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:54 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Evert Glebbeek |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:50 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Ronald de Man |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:23 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Carlos Pesce |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:34 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Christopher Conkie |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:11 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Carlos Pesce |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:12 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Christopher Conkie |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:18 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:25 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Christopher Conkie |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:34 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:37 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Christopher Conkie |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:45 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:53 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Christopher Conkie |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:27 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Christopher Conkie |
Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:42 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:07 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Ted Wong |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:43 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:16 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Christopher Conkie |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:00 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:04 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Christopher Conkie |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:09 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:50 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Asim Pereira |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:29 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:07 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:16 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Evert Glebbeek |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:25 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Tony Mokonen |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:00 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Don Dailey |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:44 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:11 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Don Dailey |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:51 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:01 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Ronald de Man |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:33 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:49 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Ronald de Man |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:03 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:31 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Don Dailey |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:34 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:15 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:23 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:19 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Evert Glebbeek |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:39 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:49 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:08 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:42 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:36 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:50 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:17 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:42 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:49 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:16 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:35 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:50 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:08 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Ed Schroder |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:16 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:57 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Daniel Mehrmann |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:45 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:06 pm |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Jon Dart |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:45 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:44 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
Jon Dart |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:15 am |
Re: What should I support, UCI or Winboard? |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:32 pm |
Winboard ftw |
Daniel Shawul |
Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:10 pm |
Re: Winboard ftw |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:45 pm |
Re: Winboard ftw |
Daniel Shawul |
Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:21 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|