TCEC 10
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:25 pm
- Full name: Colin Jenkins
Re: TCEC 10
I saw that too and was wondering the same. I just asked and somebody told me Mark L said no problem, but depends if we were talking about the same message time-frame because he has (also) said that pre numa message.
-
- Posts: 3292
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Re: TCEC 10
Or is it only display bug? Sometimes 1970 Komodo version displays suddenly up to 100% faster nps!
Jouni
-
- Posts: 1080
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:55 pm
- Location: USA/Minnesota
- Full name: Leo Anger
Re: TCEC 10
I am surprised by this news. The Komodo team has always been good with many cores. I hope they let Komodo make the adjustment. I am assuming ML knows how to fix it.
Advanced Micro Devices fan.
-
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: TCEC 10
No adjustments. Komodo must suffer. The version Komodo is playing with should have been tested before the super final, and found out if it was buggy or not... Komodo should not have any kind of special treatment
-
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm
Re: TCEC 10
Well.. rules allow one update during stage to fix play limiting bugs.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:44 am
Re: TCEC 10
It looks like Komodo is now running ~20% slower than in prior rounds.
How many ELO is that supposed to be worth?
I can't imagine K's NUMA bug is entirely responsible for the thrashing it's receiving.
How many ELO is that supposed to be worth?
I can't imagine K's NUMA bug is entirely responsible for the thrashing it's receiving.
-
- Posts: 1080
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:55 pm
- Location: USA/Minnesota
- Full name: Leo Anger
Re: TCEC 10
About Houdini overall, there is something I like about its piece sacrifices and willingness to take calculated chances.
Advanced Micro Devices fan.
-
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm
Re: TCEC 10
Indeed. Bad luck probably plays a bigger role.Geonerd wrote:It looks like Komodo is now running ~20% slower than in prior rounds.
How many ELO is that supposed to be worth?
I can't imagine K's NUMA bug is entirely responsible for the thrashing it's receiving.
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: TCEC 10
Not such thing as bad luck. It is currently +5=20-0 which translates tosyzygy wrote:Indeed. Bad luck probably plays a bigger role.Geonerd wrote:It looks like Komodo is now running ~20% slower than in prior rounds.
How many ELO is that supposed to be worth?
I can't imagine K's NUMA bug is entirely responsible for the thrashing it's receiving.
70+/-56Elo (2 sigma error bars).
Houdini is simply a stronger engine.
-
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:43 am
- Location: New Delhi, India
Re: TCEC 10
That is just loser whining, nothing else.I read from TCEC chat, that ML confirmed Komodo 1970 has NUMA bug causing slow speed
Komodo is a good Engine and in some ways even better than Houdini, but Lefler is simply paying the price of being over-cautious with his ridiculous Contempt 0.
In Chess, as in Life, sometimes chances have to be taken to achieve something worthwhile.
He who Dares, Wins !
That's EXACTLY what positive Contempt is about !About Houdini overall, there is something I like about its piece sacrifices and willingness to take calculated chances.
i7 5960X @ 4.1 Ghz, 64 GB G.Skill RipJaws RAM, Twin Asus ROG Strix OC 11 GB Geforce 2080 Tis