TCEC 10

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

op12no2
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:25 pm
Full name: Colin Jenkins

Re: TCEC 10

Post by op12no2 »

I saw that too and was wondering the same. I just asked and somebody told me Mark L said no problem, but depends if we were talking about the same message time-frame because he has (also) said that pre numa message.
Jouni
Posts: 3292
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm

Re: TCEC 10

Post by Jouni »

Or is it only display bug? Sometimes 1970 Komodo version displays suddenly up to 100% faster nps!
Jouni
Leo
Posts: 1080
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:55 pm
Location: USA/Minnesota
Full name: Leo Anger

Re: TCEC 10

Post by Leo »

I am surprised by this news. The Komodo team has always been good with many cores. I hope they let Komodo make the adjustment. I am assuming ML knows how to fix it.
Advanced Micro Devices fan.
Damir
Posts: 2801
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: Denmark
Full name: Damir Desevac

Re: TCEC 10

Post by Damir »

No adjustments. Komodo must suffer. The version Komodo is playing with should have been tested before the super final, and found out if it was buggy or not... Komodo should not have any kind of special treatment :) :)
whereagles
Posts: 565
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm

Re: TCEC 10

Post by whereagles »

Well.. rules allow one update during stage to fix play limiting bugs.
Geonerd
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:44 am

Re: TCEC 10

Post by Geonerd »

It looks like Komodo is now running ~20% slower than in prior rounds.

How many ELO is that supposed to be worth?
I can't imagine K's NUMA bug is entirely responsible for the thrashing it's receiving.
Leo
Posts: 1080
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:55 pm
Location: USA/Minnesota
Full name: Leo Anger

Re: TCEC 10

Post by Leo »

About Houdini overall, there is something I like about its piece sacrifices and willingness to take calculated chances.
Advanced Micro Devices fan.
syzygy
Posts: 5566
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm

Re: TCEC 10

Post by syzygy »

Geonerd wrote:It looks like Komodo is now running ~20% slower than in prior rounds.

How many ELO is that supposed to be worth?
I can't imagine K's NUMA bug is entirely responsible for the thrashing it's receiving.
Indeed. Bad luck probably plays a bigger role.
Milos
Posts: 4190
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am

Re: TCEC 10

Post by Milos »

syzygy wrote:
Geonerd wrote:It looks like Komodo is now running ~20% slower than in prior rounds.

How many ELO is that supposed to be worth?
I can't imagine K's NUMA bug is entirely responsible for the thrashing it's receiving.
Indeed. Bad luck probably plays a bigger role.
Not such thing as bad luck. It is currently +5=20-0 which translates to
70+/-56Elo (2 sigma error bars).
Houdini is simply a stronger engine.
shrapnel
Posts: 1339
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:43 am
Location: New Delhi, India

Re: TCEC 10

Post by shrapnel »

I read from TCEC chat, that ML confirmed Komodo 1970 has NUMA bug causing slow speed
That is just loser whining, nothing else.
Komodo is a good Engine and in some ways even better than Houdini, but Lefler is simply paying the price of being over-cautious with his ridiculous Contempt 0.
In Chess, as in Life, sometimes chances have to be taken to achieve something worthwhile.
He who Dares, Wins !
About Houdini overall, there is something I like about its piece sacrifices and willingness to take calculated chances.
That's EXACTLY what positive Contempt is about !
i7 5960X @ 4.1 Ghz, 64 GB G.Skill RipJaws RAM, Twin Asus ROG Strix OC 11 GB Geforce 2080 Tis