Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:51 pm
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
Thank you!! The source code release makes Andscacs eligible for participation in the next season of FOSCEC. Moreover, CCRL should change the engine name color from green to orange!
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:11 pm
- Location: upstate
-
- Posts: 4611
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
Formatted table as real data. (pics vanish and cannot be used for anything)
CCRL 40/40 Rating List - Custom engine selection (November 18, 2017)
CCRL 40/40 Rating List - Custom engine selection (November 18, 2017)
Code: Select all
Name Rating Err1 Err2 Score AvgOpp. Draws Games
Andscacs 0.921 64-bit 4CPU 3274 +67 -71 26.6% +138.8 50.0% 64
Andscacs 0.91 64-bit 4CPU 3239 +22 -22 42.5% +47.6 59.2% 596
Andscacs 0.89 64-bit 4CPU 3232 +21 -21 45.9% +28.8 55.0% 662
Andscacs 0.88 64-bit 4CPU 3228 +37 -37 33.2% +100.4 53.5% 217
Andscacs 0.90 64-bit 4CPU 3216 +24 -24 50.3% +1.9 55.1% 515
Andscacs 0.872 64-bit 4CPU 3209 +24 -24 51.3% -5.0 58.8% 476
Andscacs 0.92 64-bit 3161 +15 -15 53.1% -15.7 52.6% 1344
Andscacs 0.86 64-bit 4CPU 3154 +22 -22 40.0% +64.1 54.6% 639
Andscacs 0.85 64-bit 4CPU 3142 +25 -25 43.9% +42.7 53.1% 467
Andscacs 0.91 64-bit 3140 +16 -16 44.0% +37.7 56.4% 1189
Andscacs 0.921 64-bit 3138 +31 -31 42.7% +49.4 50.2% 307
Andscacs 0.90 64-bit 3127 +17 -17 48.4% +13.0 53.8% 1048
Andscacs 0.89 64-bit 3119 +17 -17 43.4% +44.2 54.4% 1029
Andscacs 0.88 64-bit 3114 +15 -15 43.6% +41.4 54.1% 1266
Andscacs 0.83 64-bit 4CPU 3113 +29 -29 46.6% +18.5 51.2% 338
Andscacs 0.872 64-bit 3107 +14 -14 43.8% +41.1 52.1% 1603
Andscacs 0.82 64-bit 4CPU 3090 +29 -29 50.6% -3.2 55.2% 330
Andscacs 0.86 64-bit 3090 +21 -21 44.7% +34.9 51.3% 678
Andscacs 0.81 64-bit 4CPU 3085 +31 -32 48.7% +5.3 49.3% 300
Andscacs 0.85 64-bit 3061 +18 -18 44.9% +33.6 48.3% 918
Andscacs 0.84 64-bit 3041 +26 -26 45.1% +32.3 46.8% 470
Andscacs 0.80 64-bit 4CPU 3030 +31 -31 50.2% -1.1 46.7% 317
Andscacs 0.83 64-bit 3014 +30 -30 47.5% +14.7 50.8% 317
Andscacs 0.82 64-bit 3010 +24 -24 47.8% +12.4 50.1% 509
Andscacs 0.81 64-bit 3003 +26 -26 55.1% -31.5 47.3% 442
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:11 pm
- Location: upstate
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
Günther, the point of my post was the color -- something your carefully formatted text table fails to convey. ;)
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:47 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Full name: Peter Kasinski
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
Here is what I see:tpoppins wrote:Günther, the point of my post was the color -- something your carefully formatted text table fails to convey.
a) 4-CPU direct comparison between 0.921 and 0.92 is not available (ver. 0.92 not having been tested with 4CPUs)
b) However, a comparison between single CPU performance indicates that ver. 0.921 (based on some 300 games) is 23 ELO *below* that of 0.92.
c) Therefore the fact that 0.921 is leading the charts for 4CPUs is misleading, and probably only because 0.92 was not tested with 4CPUs.
This would support the hypothesis that 0.921 may have have introduced an issue, irrespective of the illegal move played in one of the TCEC games.
PK
-
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
The bug of the illegal move was there from very old versions. Only that seems that a lot of cores and bad luck are necessary to manifest it.kasinp wrote:... irrespective of the illegal move played in one of the TCEC games.
Daniel José - http://www.andscacs.com
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:47 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Full name: Peter Kasinski
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
Got it, thank you for the clarification. I suppose this still leaves the question of a direct comparison between 0.92 and 0.921, for which I suppose 300+ games is probably still a small sample size.cdani wrote:The bug of the illegal move was there from very old versions. Only that seems that a lot of cores and bad luck are necessary to manifest it.kasinp wrote:... irrespective of the illegal move played in one of the TCEC games.
-
- Posts: 4611
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
Sorry, Thomas :)tpoppins wrote:Guenther, the point of my post was the color -- something your carefully formatted text table fails to convey. ;)
A pity that <code> doesn't allow color too.
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2017 9:34 pm
- Location: Bermondsey, London
- Full name: Alan Cooper
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
Hi,
Has anyone managed to compile Andscacs for Linux on the RaspBerry Pi. I keep getting missing file for Windows.h?
Thanks,
Al.
Has anyone managed to compile Andscacs for Linux on the RaspBerry Pi. I keep getting missing file for Windows.h?
Thanks,
Al.
-
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: Andscacs - New version 0.921 with source
In debug.h change:Scally wrote: Has anyone managed to compile Andscacs for Linux on the RaspBerry Pi. I keep getting missing file for Windows.h?
//#define WINDOWS <--comment this one
#define LINUX <-- activate this one
Then change the sleep as told previously in this trhead, as is waking up threads too often in linux.
Anyway no idea if it will compile for raspberry pi.
Daniel José - http://www.andscacs.com