128-core AMD server

[jwes]

What about the argument that its time to depth that matters?

TTD is a useless measurement for LazySMP.

So you're saying that LazySMP finds better moves at equal depths rather than finding the same move faster.

[jdart]

Arasan scales quite badly on 32 cores, at present. It is on my to-do list to look at soon.

But other engines do better: Stockfish for example.

Crafty also uses multiple cores efficiently and can hits amazingly high NPS, but I haven't tried it on this 32 core box.

--Jon

[Dann Corbit]

Arasan scales quite badly on 32 cores, at present. It is on my to-do list to look at soon.

But other engines do better: Stockfish for example.

Crafty also uses multiple cores efficiently and can hits amazingly high NPS, but I haven't tried it on this 32 core box.

--Jon

Texel scales brilliantly

[petero2]

Arasan scales quite badly on 32 cores, at present. It is on my to-do list to look at soon.

But other engines do better: Stockfish for example.

Crafty also uses multiple cores efficiently and can hits amazingly high NPS, but I haven't tried it on this 32 core box.

--Jon

Texel scales brilliantly

Texel is also one of a few engines that can actually use all 128 cores on that computer, assuming you compile it with cluster support.