ELO progression measured by year based on CCRL 40/20 games which were played that year. ELO numbers are based on the average rating of the 100 best engines and splitted into a (S)ingle (P)rocessor and (M)ulti (P)rocessor list, follow the orange links to view the details. Furthermore the statistic of the opening lines shows the quality of the randomness.
...
http://rebel13.nl/misc/stats.html
ELO progression measured by year
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 12038
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:50 pm
Re: ELO progression measured by year
very useful. thanks.Rebel wrote:ELO progression measured by year based on CCRL 40/20 games which were played that year. ELO numbers are based on the average rating of the 100 best engines and splitted into a (S)ingle (P)rocessor and (M)ulti (P)rocessor list, follow the orange links to view the details. Furthermore the statistic of the opening lines shows the quality of the randomness.
...
http://rebel13.nl/misc/stats.html
were there hardware changes during those years?
-
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:08 pm
Re: ELO progression measured by year
Do you have the same thing for the top 1 to 3 engines? I think averaging over 100 engines is going to make the progress look much slower than it was, at least for the stronger programs.
-
- Posts: 6991
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Re: ELO progression measured by year
That's a good question that only can be answered by the CCRL folks. If they provide information I could add an extra column to the table.duncan wrote:very useful. thanks.Rebel wrote:ELO progression measured by year based on CCRL 40/20 games which were played that year. ELO numbers are based on the average rating of the 100 best engines and splitted into a (S)ingle (P)rocessor and (M)ulti (P)rocessor list, follow the orange links to view the details. Furthermore the statistic of the opening lines shows the quality of the randomness.
...
http://rebel13.nl/misc/stats.html
were there hardware changes during those years?
-
- Posts: 6991
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Re: ELO progression measured by year
I made a start doing so, it's only for the years 2006-2008 currently, it's a lot of work. But interesting enough to finish it. Also the progress for the best engine will be measured.mjlef wrote:Do you have the same thing for the top 1 to 3 engines? I think averaging over 100 engines is going to make the progress look much slower than it was, at least for the stronger programs.
http://rebel13.nl/misc/stats.html
-
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: ELO progression measured by year
They adapt the TC to even out HW speed, so what machine each tester is using, becomes irrelevant.Rebel wrote:That's a good question that only can be answered by the CCRL folks. If they provide information I could add an extra column to the table.
-
- Posts: 12038
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:50 pm
Re: ELO progression measured by year
the increase for best program for the periodRebel wrote:ELO progression measured by year based on CCRL 40/20 games which were played that year. ELO numbers are based on the average rating of the 100 best engines and splitted into a (S)ingle (P)rocessor and (M)ulti (P)rocessor list, follow the orange links to view the details. Furthermore the statistic of the opening lines shows the quality of the randomness.
...
http://rebel13.nl/misc/stats.html
single
2921 - Rybka 2.2 64-bit
3352 - asmFish 051117 64-bit
431 increase
multiple
3002 - Rybka 2.1 64-bit 4CPU
3426 - asmFish 051117 64-bit 4CPU
424 increase
for top 3
single
2921 - Rybka 2.2 64-bit
2779 - Fritz 10
2776 - Hiarcs 11
average 2825
3352 - asmFish 051117 64-bit
3341 - Houdini 6 64-bit
3327 - SugaR XPrO 1.3 64-bit
average 3340
increase 515
multiple
3002 - Rybka 2.1 64-bit 4CPU
2864 - Hiarcs 11 4CPU
2855 - Rybka 1.1 32-bit
average 2907
3426 - asmFish 051117 64-bit 4CPU
3414 - SugaR XPrO 1.2 64-bit 4CPU
3411 - Houdini 6 64-bit 4CPU
average 3417
increase 510
-
- Posts: 6991
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Re: ELO progression measured by year
I see, so basically they are running a 40/40 list based on the hardware of 2006?Ozymandias wrote:They adapt the TC to even out HW speed, so what machine each tester is using, becomes irrelevant.Rebel wrote:That's a good question that only can be answered by the CCRL folks. If they provide information I could add an extra column to the table.
-
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: ELO progression measured by year
"Time control: Equivalent to 40 moves in 40 minutes on Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (2.4 GHz), about 15 minutes on a modern Intel CPU."
Note it's either "40/40" or "40/4", "40/20" would be CEGT.
Note it's either "40/40" or "40/4", "40/20" would be CEGT.
-
- Posts: 6991
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm