| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tord Romstad

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1750 Location: Oslo, Norway
|
Post subject: Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:30 am |
|
|
| bob wrote: |
| Tord Romstad wrote: |
- For the non-capturing moves after the hash move and killers, history move ordering performs better than no move ordering, as expected. But trying to refine this by using SEE values does not work. I have tried to sort the moves into two groups, first searching non-captures with SEE value zero ordered by history scores, and then searching losing non-captures by their SEE values. This performs slightly worse than simplistic history move ordering for all moves. I have no idea why.
- Searching the losing captures after the non-captures is slightly better than searching them before the non-captures. This is not entirely unexpected, but intuitively I would expect that searching the losing non-captures after the losing captures (i.e. first the hash move, then winning and equal captures, then killers, then non-losing non-captures, then losing captures, and finally losing non-captures) would perform better still. Surprisingly, this is not the case.
|
Are you searching tactical positions? |
No. My move generation test contains of 500 randomly selected positions from my program's games. I disable LMR, loop through all the positions, search every position to a depth of 12 plies, and compute various statistics (total number of nodes, the arithmetic and geometric mean of the number of nodes per position, average effective branching factor, and so on).
| Quote: |
| If so, losing captures before non-captures would make sense. Otherwise, to me, it does not at all. |
Why? Keep in mind that we are only talking about moves with negative SEE value here. As an example, consider the following position fragment:
[D]8/6p1/7b/7R/8/8/8/8 w - -
Why should Rg5 be searched before Rxh6? Wouldn't you expect the second move to have a much higher probability of being the best move? Still, my tests indicate that searching the losing captures after the losing non-capture performs slightly better. I wish I understood why...
Tord |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Gary |
Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:25 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:17 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:03 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
ed |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:34 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Sam Hamilton |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:07 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:46 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:35 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:27 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:05 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:50 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:27 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:29 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:51 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:54 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:57 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:22 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:05 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:31 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:56 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Steven Edwards |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:44 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:59 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:44 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:40 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:53 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:38 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:59 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:58 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:57 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Peter Fendrich |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:19 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:46 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:51 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Peter Fendrich |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:53 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:01 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Peter Fendrich |
Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:30 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:46 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Peter Fendrich |
Tue Apr 03, 2007 10:29 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:23 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:38 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Peter Fendrich |
Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:49 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tony |
Tue Apr 03, 2007 10:54 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:24 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:29 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:40 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:54 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:28 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:41 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:30 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Uri Blass |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:50 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:32 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:16 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Robert Hyatt |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:32 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:00 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Mark Lefler |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:30 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:28 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:13 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:03 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Tord Romstad |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:39 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
H.G.Muller |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:15 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Zach Wegner |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:10 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Steven Edwards |
Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:18 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Rob |
Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:01 pm |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Gary |
Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:26 am |
Re: SEE on non-capture moves in main search |
Markoff |
Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:25 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|