| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Uri Blass
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 5956 Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
|
Post subject: Re: LMR in micro-Max Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:10 pm |
|
|
| hgm wrote: |
I tried exempting Pawn moves from reduction (next to captures), and it did not make much difference scorewise (still 56% over 120 games). Only the 10% speed advantage disappeared. (It is much easier to do this in uMax, though, as Pawn double moves cannot be tried first even if they are hash moves. They are then tried in second place, which might lead to reduction of the hash move if you do not ad a lot of code. If Pawn moves are never reduced, this problem disappears automatically.)
To my surprise, at 10 times longer time-control, (5 min per game) the result stays about the same: 56.2% (47+ 41= 32-), Pawn moves + captures exempted, Pawn pushing version. I would have expected the advantage to grow with search depth, as LMR is a branching-ratio changing pruning. Apparently there is no extra advantage in thinking further ahead around the PV than in the exhaustive full-width search part beyond a certain number of moves. So I am increasing the minimum remaining depth at which LMR is applied from d=4 to d=5, which decreases the difference n depth between deepest and worst branches. |
As far as I know there is no proof that LMR helps more at longer time control.
I know that zappa1.1 and the baron that do not use LMR are 2 of the program that perform better at long time control.
Another point is that you did not play enough games.
I played 100 games match between 2 version of movei with fixed number of nodes and in one match(100000 nodes per move) the result was 60-40 for version A and in another match(200000 nodes per move with the same positions) the result was a win for version B 54-46.
version B also won a match with 400000 nodes per move 53.5-46.5 but lost by a bigger margin with 1,000,000 nodes per move(I do not remember the result and the match was in a different computer but it was better than 55-45 for version A).
Uri |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
LMR in micro-Max |
H.G.Muller |
Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:44 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
Zlaire |
Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:31 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
H.G.Muller |
Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:54 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Apr 08, 2007 4:37 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
Uri Blass |
Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:10 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:44 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:47 am |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:38 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
Dann Corbit |
Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:28 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
H.G.Muller |
Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:17 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
Peter Fendrich |
Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:05 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
William H. Rogers |
Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:27 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
Peter Fendrich |
Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:43 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
William H. Rogers |
Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:26 pm |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
H.G.Muller |
Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:44 am |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
Uri Blass |
Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:26 am |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
H.G.Muller |
Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:37 am |
Re: LMR in micro-Max |
Michael Sherwin |
Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:38 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|