The result that you give is very bad for TogaII1.2.1amclane wrote:of course. you forget that this result can be reproduded on several of my machines.
different hardware. different arena versions. different time controls. IMO not the result of toga1.2.1a is out of order, the program plays as it has always played. over the time it was overtaken by other programs. togaII1.3x4 is astonishing since it is fighting almost in the top group. with hiarcs and rybka in the group of 1-3 ranked programs.
09: Glaurung121-EM64T 4,5/11 0 0 0 = = = 0 · = 1 = 1 15,75
10: TogaII1.2.1a 3,0/11 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 = · = = 1 9,25
11: theBaron1.8.1Uci 3,0/11 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 = · 1 1 8,25
I know that in other rating list Toga1.2.1a is clearly better than Glaurung and the baron.
I think that it may be good if people try to replay the same openings with toga1.2.1a and toga1.3x4 and compare the results to see if toga1.3x4 performs better from the same openings against the same opponents.
Uri