Movei00_8_403 vs Petir439 ended 24.5 to 14.5

[pichy]

Movei403 with progress 4 6 10
Opening Book Mainbook.abk


Engine Score

Mo Pe S-B
1: Movei00_8_403 24.5/40 =1=011=1=1==1=1==0101=1011=1=0=0=11=1010 397.75
2: Petir439 14.5/40 =0=100=0=0==0=0==1010=0100=0=1=1=00=0101 397.75

40 games played / Tournament finished
Name of the tournament: Arena tournament
Site/ Country: Jorge, United States
Level: Blitz 5/1
Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1202 MHz with 512MB Memory
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600)
PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn
Website:
E-Mail Address:


And this score was with the standard movei403 configuration settings:

http://216.25.93.108/forum/viewtopic.ph ... highlight=
Engine Score Mo Pe S-B
1: Movei00_8_403 17.5/30 =10===0==1=100111=0111===1=01= 218.75
2: Petir439 12.5/30 =01===1==0=011000=1000===0=10= 218.75

30 games played / Tournament finished
Name of the tournament: Arena tournament
Site/ Country: Jorge, United States
Level: Blitz 5/1
Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1202 MHz with 512MB Memory
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600)
PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn
Website:
E-Mail Address:

[Uri Blass]

40 games
Movei scored 24.5
simple math tells me that petir scored 15.5 and also if you count the points you can find that it scored 15.5

I think that the difference is small and the number of games that were played are not enough to get a conclusion about which version is best.

I played more games that lead me to believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version but I also did not play enough games so I hope to see some results by the ccrl.

Note that I claimed that 403 10 10 10 performed better than 418 10 10 10 against fruit but it did not prevent 418 10 10 10 to score more than 50% against 403 10 10 10 in my tests so I am really unsure if 403 10 10 10 is better than 418 10 10 10.

hopefully CCRL will give me some data.

I believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version and the same for 418 but again I do not have enough data and again I hope other testers will test 403 10 10 10 because when I release a new version sometimes later I would like to compare with better personality of 403.


Uri

[pichy]

40 games
Movei scored 24.5
simple math tells me that petir scored 15.5 and also if you count the points you can find that it scored 15.5

I think that the difference is small and the number of games that were played are not enough to get a conclusion about which version is best.

I played more games that lead me to believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version but I also did not play enough games so I hope to see some results by the ccrl.

Note that I claimed that 403 10 10 10 performed better than 418 10 10 10 against fruit but it did not prevent 418 10 10 10 to score more than 50% against 403 10 10 10 in my tests so I am really unsure if 403 10 10 10 is better than 418 10 10 10.

hopefully CCRL will give me some data.

I believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version and the same for 418 but again I do not have enough data and again I hope other testers will test 403 10 10 10 because when I release a new version sometimes later I would like to compare with better personality of 403.


Uri

Yes Petir score should have been 15.5, it is hard at this moment for me to conclude anything at all, but I am not having such a great result with progress 10 10 10. I would almost say that progress 4 6 10 is equal to progress 10 10 10. I will continue to test these two configurations for anothe 300 games against the same number of opponents.

[Uri Blass]

40 games
Movei scored 24.5
simple math tells me that petir scored 15.5 and also if you count the points you can find that it scored 15.5

I think that the difference is small and the number of games that were played are not enough to get a conclusion about which version is best.

I played more games that lead me to believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version but I also did not play enough games so I hope to see some results by the ccrl.

Note that I claimed that 403 10 10 10 performed better than 418 10 10 10 against fruit but it did not prevent 418 10 10 10 to score more than 50% against 403 10 10 10 in my tests so I am really unsure if 403 10 10 10 is better than 418 10 10 10.

hopefully CCRL will give me some data.

I believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version and the same for 418 but again I do not have enough data and again I hope other testers will test 403 10 10 10 because when I release a new version sometimes later I would like to compare with better personality of 403.


Uri

Yes Petir score should have been 15.5, it is hard at this moment for me to conclude anything at all, but I am not having such a great result with progress 10 10 10. I would almost say that progress 4 6 10 is equal to progress 10 10 10. I will continue to test these two configurations for anothe 300 games against the same number of opponents.

Note that I believe that progress 10 10 10 is weaker than fruit2.0 and it was simply lucky in the match that it won but still 403 default had never that type of luck and 403 progress 10 10 10 also beated 403 default in my games with fixed number of nodes.

Note that result in 100 game match can be changed at different matches(different positions or different time control) and a program can win 51-49 in one match and lose 59-41 in another match when the average result is 46 points.

Uri

[pichy]

40 games
Movei scored 24.5
simple math tells me that petir scored 15.5 and also if you count the points you can find that it scored 15.5

I think that the difference is small and the number of games that were played are not enough to get a conclusion about which version is best.

I played more games that lead me to believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version but I also did not play enough games so I hope to see some results by the ccrl.

Note that I claimed that 403 10 10 10 performed better than 418 10 10 10 against fruit but it did not prevent 418 10 10 10 to score more than 50% against 403 10 10 10 in my tests so I am really unsure if 403 10 10 10 is better than 418 10 10 10.

hopefully CCRL will give me some data.

I believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version and the same for 418 but again I do not have enough data and again I hope other testers will test 403 10 10 10 because when I release a new version sometimes later I would like to compare with better personality of 403.


Uri

Yes Petir score should have been 15.5, it is hard at this moment for me to conclude anything at all, but I am not having such a great result with progress 10 10 10. I would almost say that progress 4 6 10 is equal to progress 10 10 10. I will continue to test these two configurations for anothe 300 games against the same number of opponents.

Note that I believe that progress 10 10 10 is weaker than fruit2.0 and it was simply lucky in the match that it won but still 403 default had never that type of luck and 403 progress 10 10 10 also beated 403 default in my games with fixed number of nodes.

Note that result in 100 game match can be changed at different matches(different positions or different time control) and a program can win 51-49 in one match and lose 59-41 in another match when the average result is 46 points.

Uri

Yes you are correct to say that in 100 game match the result changes with different opponents and different time controls. I noticed that progress 10 10 10 scored only 48% vs Petir 439 in 100 games at 5/1 minutes, while progress 4 6 10 scored 53% versus Petir 439 and versus Colossus 2007a progress 10 10 10 scored 47% and with progress 4 6 10 it scored 52%. Finally versus RebelUci Movei 403 Progress 10 10 10 scored 49% and with progress 4 6 10 Movei 403 scored 52% in 100 game match.

PS: I am noticing that progress 4 6 10 at 5 minutes plus 1 sec bonus per move is scoring better than progress 10 10 10, but I can NOT conclude that it will score better than progress 10 10 10 at different time control.

[pichy]

40 games
Movei scored 24.5
simple math tells me that petir scored 15.5 and also if you count the points you can find that it scored 15.5

I think that the difference is small and the number of games that were played are not enough to get a conclusion about which version is best.

I played more games that lead me to believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version but I also did not play enough games so I hope to see some results by the ccrl.

Note that I claimed that 403 10 10 10 performed better than 418 10 10 10 against fruit but it did not prevent 418 10 10 10 to score more than 50% against 403 10 10 10 in my tests so I am really unsure if 403 10 10 10 is better than 418 10 10 10.

hopefully CCRL will give me some data.

I believe that 403 10 10 10 is better than the default version and the same for 418 but again I do not have enough data and again I hope other testers will test 403 10 10 10 because when I release a new version sometimes later I would like to compare with better personality of 403.


Uri

Yes Petir score should have been 15.5, it is hard at this moment for me to conclude anything at all, but I am not having such a great result with progress 10 10 10. I would almost say that progress 4 6 10 is equal to progress 10 10 10. I will continue to test these two configurations for anothe 300 games against the same number of opponents.

Note that I believe that progress 10 10 10 is weaker than fruit2.0 and it was simply lucky in the match that it won but still 403 default had never that type of luck and 403 progress 10 10 10 also beated 403 default in my games with fixed number of nodes.

Note that result in 100 game match can be changed at different matches(different positions or different time control) and a program can win 51-49 in one match and lose 59-41 in another match when the average result is 46 points.

Uri

Yes you are correct to say that in 100 game match the result changes with different opponents and different time controls. I noticed that progress 10 10 10 scored only 48% vs Petir 439 in 100 games at 5/1 minutes, while progress 4 6 10 scored 53% versus Petir 439 and versus Colossus 2007a progress 10 10 10 scored 47% and with progress 4 6 10 it scored 52%. Finally versus RebelUci Movei 403 Progress 10 10 10 scored 49% and with progress 4 6 10 Movei 403 scored 52% in 100 game match.

PS: I am noticing that progress 4 6 10 at 5 minutes plus 1 sec bonus per move is scoring better than progress 10 10 10, but I can NOT conclude that it will score better than progress 10 10 10 at different time control.

Uri I just started for the first time to test progress 4 6 10 at slower time control or game at 30 minutes versus Slowchess Blitz WV 2.1 and the result after 6 games are amazing so far:

Engine Score Mo Sl S-B
1: Movei00_8_403 5.0/6 ······ 1=1=11 5.00
2: Slow 1.0/6 0=0=00 ······ 5.00

6 of 48 games played
Name of the tournament: Arena tournament
Site/ Country: Jorge, United States
Level: Blitz 30/0
Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1202 MHz with 512MB Memory
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600)
PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn
Website:
E-Mail Address:



[Event "Arena tournament"]
[Site "Jorge"]
[Date "2007.05.09"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Movei00_8_403"]
[Black "Slow"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D34"]
[Opening "QGD Tarrasch"]
[Time "22:13:59"]
[Variation "9.Bg5 cxd4 10.Nxd4 h6"]
[TimeControl "1800+0"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "104"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Nf3 c5 5.cxd5 exd5 6.g3 Nc6 7.Bg2 Be7 8.O-O O-O
9.Bg5 cxd4 10.Nxd4 h6 11.Bf4 Bg4 12.h3 Be6 13.Nxe6 fxe6 14.Qc2 Qd7 15.Rfd1 Bd6
16.Bxd6 Qxd6 17.e4 d4 18.Qb3 a6 19.f4 Qb4 20.Qxe6+ Kh8 21.Nd5 Qxb2 22.Rab1 Qxa2 23.Nc7
Qxe6 24.Nxe6 Rf7 25.e5 Ng8 26.Rxb7 Rxb7 27.Bxc6 Rba7 28.Bxa8 Rxa8 29.Rxd4 a5 30.Nc5
Ne7 31.e6 Kg8 32.g4 Kf8 33.f5 Nc6 34.Rd6 Ne5 35.Nb7 Ke8 36.Rb6 Ke7 37.Nd6 Rd8
38.Ne4 Kf8 39.Rb7 Ra8 40.e7+ Kg8 41.Nd6 a4 42.Ra7 Rb8 43.e8=Q+ Rxe8 44.Nxe8 a3 45.Kf2
Nd3+ 46.Kf3 Nb4 47.Rxa3 Kf8 48.Nc7 Kf7 49.Ne6 g6 50.Nd8+ Kf6 51.Rb3 Nd5 52.Rb5 Nc7
{1-0 Arena Adjudication} 1-0

[Event "Arena tournament"]
[Site "Jorge"]
[Date "2007.05.09"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Slow"]
[Black "Movei00_8_403"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A31"]
[Opening "English"]
[Time "22:56:23"]
[Variation "Symmetrical, Two Knights, 4...g6"]
[TimeControl "1800+0"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "129"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1.Nf3 c5 2.e4 g6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Bg7 5.c4 Nf6 6.Nc3 d6 7.Be2 Nbd7 8.O-O O-O
9.Be3 Nc5 10.f3 Bd7 11.Qd2 Re8 12.b4 Ne6 13.Nb3 a6 14.Rad1 Rc8 15.f4 Nf8 16.f5 Bc6
17.Qd3 N8d7 18.Bd4 b6 19.Nd5 e5 20.Be3 Nxd5 21.cxd5 Bb5 22.Qd2 Nf6 23.fxg6 fxg6
24.Bxb5 axb5 25.Qd3 Rc4 26.Nd2 Rxb4 27.a3 Ra4 28.Qxb5 Qd7 29.Qxb6 Nxe4 30.Nxe4 Rxe4
31.Rdc1 Qd8 32.Qxd8 Rxd8 33.Bb6 Ra8 34.Rc6 Bf8 35.Bc7 Rd4 36.Bxd6 Rxd5 37.Bxf8 Rxf8
38.Rxf8+ Kxf8 39.Rc7 h5 40.a4 Rd2 41.a5 Ra2 42.Rc6 Kf7 43.a6 e4 44.Rc7+ Ke6 45.a7 e3
46.Kf1 h4 47.Rh7 Ke5 48.Rxh4 Rxa7 49.Rg4 Kf5 50.Rg3 Ra3 51.Ke2 Kf4 52.Rxg6 Ra2+ 53.Ke1
Rc2 54.h3 Ke4 55.h4 Kd3 56.Rd6+ Ke4 57.Rg6 Rc1+ 58.Ke2 Rc2+ 59.Kd1 Ra2 60.Rg8 Ra1+
61.Ke2 Ra2+ 62.Kd1 Ra1+ 63.Ke2 Ra2+ 64.Ke1 Ra1+ 65.Ke2 {3-fold repetition} 1/2-1/2

[Event "Arena tournament"]
[Site "Jorge"]
[Date "2007.05.09"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Movei00_8_403"]
[Black "Slow"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C42"]
[Opening "Russian Game"]
[Time "23:37:41"]
[Variation "Boden-Kieseritsky Gambit"]
[TimeControl "1800+0"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "156"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bc4 Nxe4 4.d3 Nd6 5.Nxe5 Nxc4 6.dxc4 Qe7 7.O-O d6 8.Nf3 Be6
9.Re1 h6 10.b3 Nd7 11.Bb2 O-O-O 12.Bd4 a6 13.Qd3 f6 14.Nc3 Qf7 15.Rad1 g5 16.Qe2 Re8
17.Be3 Bg7 18.Nd5 Kb8 19.Qd2 Ne5 20.Nxe5 fxe5 21.Qa5 e4 22.Nb4 Bc8 23.c5 dxc5 24.Qxc5
b6 25.Qc6 Be5 26.Qa4 Bc3 27.Ref1 a5 28.Nc6+ Kb7 29.a3 Qg6 30.Nxa5+ Bxa5 31.b4 Bg4
32.Rdb1 Qc6 33.Qxc6+ Kxc6 34.bxa5 bxa5 35.Rb3 Rh7 36.h3 Be2 37.Re1 Bb5 38.a4 Ba6
39.Rc3+ Kd7 40.Rc5 Ra8 41.h4 gxh4 42.Bf4 Rc8 43.Rxe4 Bb7 44.Rd4+ Ke6 45.Kh2 Rg7 46.f3
Rh7 47.Rxa5 c5 48.Rd6+ Kf5 49.Be3 Ke5 50.Rd4 h5 51.Rxh4 Kd6 52.Rb5 Ba6 53.Rb1 Bb7
54.a5 Ke5 55.Kg1 Kd6 56.Kf2 Bc6 57.Rc4 Bd5 58.Rb6+ Kd7 59.Rxc5 Rxc5 60.Bxc5 Kc8 61.a6
h4 62.Bd6 Ra7 63.c4 Bxc4 64.Rb8+ Kd7 65.Rb7+ Kxd6 66.Rxa7 Kc6 67.f4 Kb6 68.Rh7
Kxa6 69.f5 Kb5 70.f6 Kc6 71.f7 Bxf7 72.Rxf7 Kd6 73.g4 hxg3+ 74.Ke3 Ke5 75.Rg7 Kf6
76.Rxg3 Ke5 77.Rf3 Kd5 78.Rf5+ Ke6 {1-0 Arena Adjudication} 1-0

[Event "Arena tournament"]
[Site "Jorge"]
[Date "2007.05.10"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Slow"]
[Black "Movei00_8_403"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B13"]
[Opening "Caro-Kann"]
[Time "00:30:51"]
[Variation "Exchange, Rubinstein Variation"]
[TimeControl "1800+0"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "345"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.Bd3 Nc6 5.c3 Nf6 6.Bf4 e6 7.Nf3 Bd7 8.O-O Qb6 9.b3
Rc8 10.Re1 Be7 11.Nbd2 O-O 12.Ne5 Rfe8 13.Bg5 Nxe5 14.dxe5 Ne4 15.Nxe4 dxe4 16.Be3
Qc7 17.Bxe4 Bc6 18.Bd4 Bxe4 19.Rxe4 Bc5 20.Bxc5 Qxc5 21.c4 Red8 22.Qe1 Qc6 23.f3
Qb6+ 24.Kf1 Rd3 25.Rd1 Rxd1 26.Qxd1 Rd8 27.Qe1 Rd7 28.Qf2 Rd1+ 29.Re1 Rd4 30.Kg1 Qa5
31.h3 Rd7 32.f4 Rd2 33.Re2 Rd7 34.Kh2 g6 35.Qe3 a6 36.c5 Qb5 37.Rc2 Rd3 38.Qe4 Rd5
39.Qc4 Qc6 40.Qc3 Kf8 41.b4 Qb5 42.Qc4 Qc6 43.a3 Kg7 44.Qc3 Qa4 45.Rc1 Qc6 46.Qe3 Qd7
47.Rc3 Rd1 48.Qe4 Qd2 49.Rc2 Qd4 50.Qxd4 Rxd4 51.Rf2 Rc4 52.g3 a5 53.Rb2 axb4 54.axb4
h6 55.h4 f5 56.Kg2 g5 57.hxg5 hxg5 58.fxg5 Kg6 59.Kh2 Kxg5 60.Kh3 f4 61.Kg2 fxg3
62.Kxg3 Kf5 63.Kf2 Kxe5 64.Ke3 Rc3+ 65.Kf2 Ke4 66.Re2+ Kf5 67.Rb2 e5 68.Rb1 e4 69.Ke2
Ke5 70.Ra1 Rb3 71.Ra5 Rxb4 72.c6+ Kf4 73.cxb7 Rxb7 74.Rh5 Rb2+ 75.Ke1 Ra2 76.Rh6 e3
77.Rg6 Kf5 78.Rh6 Rg2 79.Rd6 Rb2 80.Rh6 Kg4 81.Rg6+ Kf3 82.Rf6+ Kg3 83.Rg6+ Kf4 84.Rh6
Kf5 85.Rd6 Rc2 86.Rh6 Ra2 87.Rd6 Rh2 88.Rc6 Rf2 89.Rd6 Rg2 90.Rh6 Kg5 91.Re6 Kf4
92.Rf6+ Ke4 93.Rh6 Kd3 94.Rd6+ Kc4 95.Re6 Kd4 96.Rf6 Kd5 97.Rh6 Ra2 98.Rg6 Rf2 99.Rh6
Rc2 100.Rg6 Rh2 101.Rf6 Kc4 102.Rg6 Kd3 103.Rd6+ Ke4 104.Re6+ Kf3 105.Rf6+ Kg3
106.Rg6+ Kf4 107.Rf6+ Ke5 108.Rg6 Ra2 109.Rh6 Rb2 110.Rg6 Rh2 111.Rc6 Rf2 112.Rg6 Rb2
113.Rh6 Kd5 114.Rg6 Rd2 115.Rh6 Rg2 116.Rf6 Kd4 117.Rh6 Rc2 118.Rg6 Ke4 119.Rh6 Kf5
120.Rd6 Rf2 121.Rh6 Kg5 122.Re6 Ra2 123.Rxe3 Ra8 124.Rf3 Kg4 125.Re3 Kf4 126.Rh3 Ra2
127.Rd3 Rg2 128.Rh3 Ke4 129.Rc3 Rh2 130.Rg3 Ra2 131.Rh3 Rb2 132.Rg3 Rc2 133.Rh3 Ra2
134.Rg3 Rb2 135.Rh3 Kd4 136.Rg3 Rh2 137.Rf3 Ra2 138.Rg3 Rc2 139.Rh3 Ke4 140.Rg3 Kf4
141.Rh3 Rg2 142.Rd3 Ra2 143.Rh3 Rc2 144.Rd3 Rh2 145.Rc3 Kg4 146.Rd3 Rb2 147.Re3 Kf4
148.Rh3 Rb8 149.Rd3 Rf8 150.Rh3 Ra8 151.Rd3 Rb8 152.Rh3 Rb2 153.Rd3 Rb6 154.Rh3 Kg4
155.Re3 Kf5 156.Rf3+ Ke4 157.Rg3 Rb8 158.Rh3 Kd4 159.Rg3 Rb2 160.Rh3 Rc2 161.Rg3 Kc4
162.Rh3 Rg2 163.Rf3 Kd4 164.Rh3 Kd5 165.Rf3 Rh2 166.Rg3 Kc5 167.Rf3 Kd4 168.Rg3 Kd5
169.Rf3 Kc5 170.Rf2 Rh8 171.Rc2+ Kd4 172.Rd2+ Kc3 173.Re2 {50 moves rule} 1/2-1/2

[Event "Arena tournament"]
[Site "Jorge"]
[Date "2007.05.10"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Movei00_8_403"]
[Black "Slow"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C87"]
[Opening "Spanish"]
[Time "01:32:40"]
[Variation "Closed, Averbakh, 7.c3 O-O 8.h3 Bd7"]
[TimeControl "1800+0"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "165"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 O-O 7.c3 d6 8.h3 Bd7 9.d4
Re8 10.a3 exd4 11.cxd4 d5 12.e5 Ne4 13.Nbd2 Bf5 14.Bc2 Nxd2 15.Bxd2 Bxc2 16.Qxc2
Qd7 17.Rac1 a5 18.Qd3 Nd8 19.Rc3 Ne6 20.Rec1 a4 21.h4 c6 22.h5 Rac8 23.Be3 b6 24.h6
g6 25.Rd1 Rcb8 26.g3 Rb7 27.Rcc1 Rd8 28.Qf1 c5 29.Rc2 Rc7 30.Qe2 Ra7 31.Rdc1 Re8
32.Qd1 Rb7 33.Kh2 c4 34.Qe2 Nd8 35.Kg1 Qf5 36.Ne1 f6 37.f4 Nf7 38.Qf3 Qd7 39.Rh2 Bf8
40.g4 fxe5 41.fxe5 g5 42.Ng2 Qe6 43.Bd2 Rd7 44.Ne3 Nxh6 45.Rf1 Bg7 46.Nf5 Nf7 47.Qd1
Ra7 48.Nxg7 Kxg7 49.Rf6 Qd7 50.Qf3 Kg8 51.Qh3 Nh8 52.Qh5 Qc8 53.Rh6 Ree7 54.Bxg5
Reg7 55.Rd6 Ra8 56.Rd8+ Qxd8 57.Bxd8 Rxd8 58.Qf5 Ng6 59.Qe6+ Kh8 60.Rf2 b5 61.Rf7
Rdg8 62.Qf6 h6 63.e6 Kh7 64.e7 Nxe7 65.Qxe7 Rxf7 66.Qxf7+ Kh8 67.Kf2 Rxg4 68.Qe6
Rf4+ 69.Kg3 Re4 70.Qxh6+ Kg8 71.Qg5+ Kf8 72.Kf3 Re1 73.Qxd5 Rf1+ 74.Ke3 Rg1 75.Qxb5
Rg3+ 76.Kd2 Rg2+ 77.Kc3 Rg1 78.Qxa4 Ke7 79.Qa7+ Kd6 80.Qa6+ Ke7 81.d5 Re1 82.Qb7+
Kf6 83.Qb6+ {1-0 Arena Adjudication} 1-0

[Event "Arena tournament"]
[Site "Jorge"]
[Date "2007.05.10"]
[Round "6"]
[White "Slow"]
[Black "Movei00_8_403"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "D05"]
[Opening "Colle"]
[Time "02:27:21"]
[Variation "3...e6 4.Bd3 c5"]
[TimeControl "1800+0"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "121"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1.d4 e6 2.Nf3 c5 3.e3 Nf6 4.Bd3 d5 5.O-O Nbd7 6.b3 Bd6 7.Bb2 Qc7 8.c4 e5 9.dxe5
Nxe5 10.Nxe5 Bxe5 11.Nc3 dxc4 12.Bxc4 Bg4 13.Qc2 Bxh2+ 14.Kh1 Be5 15.f3 Be6 16.Bb5+
Kf8 17.f4 Ng4 18.fxe5 Qxe5 19.g3 Qxg3 20.Qe2 Rd8 21.Rf3 Qh4+ 22.Kg1 a6 23.Bc4 Bxc4
24.bxc4 Ne5 25.Rf2 Nxc4 26.Qf3 Qg5+ 27.Kh1 Qh6+ 28.Kg1 f6 29.Qxb7 Nxe3 30.Qxa6 Qg5+
31.Kh1 Ng4 32.Re2 Qh4+ 33.Kg1 Qg3+ 34.Rg2 Qe3+ 35.Kh1 Qh3+ 36.Kg1 Ne3 37.Re2 Qg3+
38.Kh1 Rd4 39.Qc8+ Kf7 40.Qb7+ Kg6 41.Rh2 Rh4 42.Qe4+ Rxe4 43.Rg1 Qxg1+ 44.Kxg1 Rf4
45.Rf2 Rg4+ 46.Kh1 Re8 47.Bc1 Re5 48.Bxe3 Rxe3 49.Ne2 Rh3+ 50.Rh2 Rxh2+ 51.Kxh2 Re4
52.Nc3 Re3 53.Nd5 Ra3 54.Nb6 h5 55.Kg2 Rxa2+ 56.Kg1 h4 57.Nd5 Kf5 58.Nc3 Rc2 59.Nd5
Ke4 60.Ne7 g5 61.Ng8 {White resigns} 0-1

[Uri Blass]

your results are good.

In 6 games everything can happen.

In my opinion more amazing is the 9.5:0.5 that the default version got against fruit2.0 in the first 10 games only to lose 9.5:0.5 in the last 10 games of the match.

Thanks for your testing

I admit that I did not test 4 6 10
Here are some results from the ccrl for version 418

see
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.li ... _length=30

Note that I plan to make 418 faster by adding pawn hash tables
I do not know how much speed improvement I can get from it.

1 Movei 0.08.418(10 10 10) 2661 +27 −27 48.7% +7.6 27.8% 479
59.5%
Movei 0.08.418 2656 +27 −27 48.0% +12.6 31.5% 480
64.8%
Movei 0.08.418(3 7 10) 2649 +26 −26 47.0% +19.5 34.1% 478
67.6%
Movei 0.08.418(2 4 10) 2640 +27 −27 45.9% +28.8 27.1% 476
66.8%


Uri

[pichy]

your results are good.

In 6 games everything can happen.

In my opinion more amazing is the 9.5:0.5 that the default version got against fruit2.0 in the first 10 games only to lose 9.5:0.5 in the last 10 games of the match.

Thanks for your testing

I admit that I did not test 4 6 10
Here are some results from the ccrl for version 418

see
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.li ... _length=30

Note that I plan to make 418 faster by adding pawn hash tables
I do not know how much speed improvement I can get from it.

1 Movei 0.08.418(10 10 10) 2661 +27 −27 48.7% +7.6 27.8% 479
59.5%
Movei 0.08.418 ( ? ? ? ) 2656 +27 −27 48.0% +12.6 31.5% 480
64.8%

What progress was used for the second configuration settings

Movei 0.08.418(3 7 10) 2649 +26 −26 47.0% +19.5 34.1% 478
67.6%
Movei 0.08.418(2 4 10) 2640 +27 −27 45.9% +28.8 27.1% 476
66.8%


Uri

I will continue this match up to 50 games at this time control, so far movei progress 4 6 10 is doing great against Slowchess Blitz rated over 2700

Engine Score Mo Sl
1: Movei00_8_403 7.0/11 ········· 1=1=1100=1=
2: Slow 4.0/11 0=0=0011=0= ·········

11 of 48 games played
Name of the tournament: Arena tournament
Site/ Country: Jorge, United States
Level: Blitz 30/0
Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1202 MHz with 512MB Memory
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600)
PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn
Website:
E-Mail Address: