28.Qxf6
[D] r6k/pp3R1p/2np1bpP/8/2P2B1Q/3P4/5PPK/q7 w - -
[Event "WCCC 2008"]
[Site "Beijing"]
[Date "2008.09.28"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Rybka"]
[Black "The Baron"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nc4 Nxe4 5. Nc3 Nxc3
6. bxc3 g6 7. d4 Bg7 8. Bd3 O-O 9. O-O Nc6 10. Qf3 Re8
11. Bf4 Bd7 12. Ne3 Na5 13. Qg3 Bc6 14. h4 Be4 15. h5 Qd7
16. Rae1 Qc6 17. h6 Bxd3 18. cxd3 Bf6 19. c4 Bxd4 20. Nd5
Rxe1 21. Rxe1 Qc5 22. Re7 Nc6 23. Rxc7 Qa5 24. Qh4 Qxa2
25. Nf6+ Kh8 26. Rxf7 Qa1+ 27. Kh2 Bxf6 28. Qxf6+ Qxf6
29. Rxf6 Kg8 30. Rxd6 Rf8 31. Kg3 a5 32. Bc1 a4 33. f3 Rd8
34. Rxd8+ Nxd8 35. Kf4 Kf7 36. d4 g5+ 37. Ke4 Ne6 38. Kd3
Kg6 39. d5 Nc5+ 40. Kc3 Kxh6 41. Be3 Nd7 42. Kb4 a3
43. Kxa3 Kg6 44. Bd4 Kf7 45. Ka4 Ke8 46. g4 Nf8 47. Ka5 Kd7
48. Kb6 Kc8 49. Kc5 Kc7 50. Be5+ Kd7 51. Bf6 h6 52. Bg7 Ng6
53. Bxh6 Ne5 54. Bxg5 Nxf3 1-0
Will your Rybka 3 play this move?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
tjfroh
- Posts: 8087
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:51 pm
- Location: Near the Intel Plant in the Land of Manana
- Full name: Timothy Frohlick
Re: Will your Rybka 3 play this move?
Mr. Burcham,
No it won't. Why would it? That would make a win into a possible draw.
Tj
No it won't. Why would it? That would make a win into a possible draw.
Tj
A New Way Comes Upon Earth.
God is an infinitely variable Constant.
Man marks his ground with ideologies.
Galaxies are the dreidels of God.
War is a punishment for implacability.
Peace flows from forgiveness of sins.
God is an infinitely variable Constant.
Man marks his ground with ideologies.
Galaxies are the dreidels of God.
War is a punishment for implacability.
Peace flows from forgiveness of sins.
-
kgburcham
- Posts: 2016
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:19 pm
Tim look again
Maybe I am missing something Tim.
It seems Rybka 3 played 28.Qxf6?
Rybka blundered.
Maybe it was time issue where Rybka played from depth 2. Not sure.
kgburcham
Rybka - The Baron
WCCC 2008 Beijing (1), 28.09.2008
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nc4 Nxe4 5.Nc3 Nxc3 6.bxc3 g6 7.d4 Bg7 8.Bd3 0–0 9.0–0 Nc6 10.Qf3 Re8 11.Bf4 Bd7 12.Ne3 Na5 13.Qg3 Bc6 14.h4 Be4 15.h5 Qd7 16.Rae1 Qc6 17.h6 Bxd3 18.cxd3 Bf6 19.c4 Bxd4 20.Nd5 Rxe1 21.Rxe1 Qc5 22.Re7 Nc6 23.Rxc7 Qa5 24.Qh4 Qxa2 25.Nf6+ Kh8 26.Rxf7 Qa1+ 27.Kh2 Bxf6 28.Qxf6+ Qxf6 29.Rxf6 Kg8 30.Rxd6 Rf8 31.Kg3 a5 32.Bc1 a4 33.f3 Rd8 34.Rxd8+ Nxd8 35.Kf4 Kf7 36.d4 g5+ 37.Ke4 Ne6 38.Kd3 Kg6 39.d5 Nc5+ 40.Kc3 Kxh6 41.Be3 Nd7 42.Kb4 a3 43.Kxa3 Kg6 44.Bd4 Kf7 45.Ka4 Ke8 46.g4 Nf8 47.Ka5 Kd7 48.Kb6 Kc8 49.Kc5 Kc7 50.Be5+ Kd7 51.Bf6 h6 52.Bg7 Ng6 53.Bxh6 Ne5 54.Bxg5 Nxf3 1–0
[D] r6k/pp3R1p/2np1bpP/8/2P2B1Q/3P4/5PPK/q7 w - - 0 1
28.Qxf6+
+/- (1.27) Depth: 2 00:00:00
28.Rxf6 Qc3 29.Rf7 Kg8 30.Rg7+ Kh8 31.Rxb7 Qd4 32.Bg3
+- (2.96) Depth: 9 00:00:01 227kN
28.Rxf6 Kg8 29.Qg5 Ne5
+- (2.58) Depth: 10 00:00:02 289kN
28.Rxf6
+- (2.78) Depth: 11 00:00:02 353kN
28.Rxf6 Qe1 29.Rxg6 Rf8 30.Rxd6 Qe7 31.Qxe7 Nxe7 32.Bc1 Nc6 33.Rd7
+- (3.51) Depth: 11 00:00:06 956kN
28.Rxf6 Qe1 29.Rxg6 Rf8 30.Rxd6 Qe7 31.Qxe7 Nxe7 32.Bc1 Nc6 33.Rd7
+- (3.69) Depth: 12 00:00:07 1073kN
28.Rxf6
+- (4.09) Depth: 13 00:00:12 1761kN
28.Rxf6 Qe1 29.Rxg6 Rf8 30.Rxd6 Qe7 31.Qxe7 Nxe7 32.Bg5 Ng6 33.Rd7 Rxf2 34.Be3
+- (4.43) Depth: 13 00:00:16 2282kN
28.Rxf6 Qa5 29.Rf7 Qh5
+- (4.61) Depth: 14 00:00:23 3297kN
28.Rxf6
+- (5.01) Depth: 15 00:00:45 6414kN
28.Rxf6
+- (5.41) Depth: 15 00:03:30 38948kN
28.Rxf6
+- (5.80) Depth: 15 00:09:38 117mN
28.Rxf6
+- (6.10) Depth: 16 00:21:25 275mN
28.Rxf6
+- (6.48) Depth: 17 01:09:31 1355mN
28.Rxf6
+- (6.68) Depth: 18 01:56:35 2047mN
It seems Rybka 3 played 28.Qxf6?
Rybka blundered.
Maybe it was time issue where Rybka played from depth 2. Not sure.
kgburcham
Rybka - The Baron
WCCC 2008 Beijing (1), 28.09.2008
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nc4 Nxe4 5.Nc3 Nxc3 6.bxc3 g6 7.d4 Bg7 8.Bd3 0–0 9.0–0 Nc6 10.Qf3 Re8 11.Bf4 Bd7 12.Ne3 Na5 13.Qg3 Bc6 14.h4 Be4 15.h5 Qd7 16.Rae1 Qc6 17.h6 Bxd3 18.cxd3 Bf6 19.c4 Bxd4 20.Nd5 Rxe1 21.Rxe1 Qc5 22.Re7 Nc6 23.Rxc7 Qa5 24.Qh4 Qxa2 25.Nf6+ Kh8 26.Rxf7 Qa1+ 27.Kh2 Bxf6 28.Qxf6+ Qxf6 29.Rxf6 Kg8 30.Rxd6 Rf8 31.Kg3 a5 32.Bc1 a4 33.f3 Rd8 34.Rxd8+ Nxd8 35.Kf4 Kf7 36.d4 g5+ 37.Ke4 Ne6 38.Kd3 Kg6 39.d5 Nc5+ 40.Kc3 Kxh6 41.Be3 Nd7 42.Kb4 a3 43.Kxa3 Kg6 44.Bd4 Kf7 45.Ka4 Ke8 46.g4 Nf8 47.Ka5 Kd7 48.Kb6 Kc8 49.Kc5 Kc7 50.Be5+ Kd7 51.Bf6 h6 52.Bg7 Ng6 53.Bxh6 Ne5 54.Bxg5 Nxf3 1–0
[D] r6k/pp3R1p/2np1bpP/8/2P2B1Q/3P4/5PPK/q7 w - - 0 1
28.Qxf6+
+/- (1.27) Depth: 2 00:00:00
28.Rxf6 Qc3 29.Rf7 Kg8 30.Rg7+ Kh8 31.Rxb7 Qd4 32.Bg3
+- (2.96) Depth: 9 00:00:01 227kN
28.Rxf6 Kg8 29.Qg5 Ne5
+- (2.58) Depth: 10 00:00:02 289kN
28.Rxf6
+- (2.78) Depth: 11 00:00:02 353kN
28.Rxf6 Qe1 29.Rxg6 Rf8 30.Rxd6 Qe7 31.Qxe7 Nxe7 32.Bc1 Nc6 33.Rd7
+- (3.51) Depth: 11 00:00:06 956kN
28.Rxf6 Qe1 29.Rxg6 Rf8 30.Rxd6 Qe7 31.Qxe7 Nxe7 32.Bc1 Nc6 33.Rd7
+- (3.69) Depth: 12 00:00:07 1073kN
28.Rxf6
+- (4.09) Depth: 13 00:00:12 1761kN
28.Rxf6 Qe1 29.Rxg6 Rf8 30.Rxd6 Qe7 31.Qxe7 Nxe7 32.Bg5 Ng6 33.Rd7 Rxf2 34.Be3
+- (4.43) Depth: 13 00:00:16 2282kN
28.Rxf6 Qa5 29.Rf7 Qh5
+- (4.61) Depth: 14 00:00:23 3297kN
28.Rxf6
+- (5.01) Depth: 15 00:00:45 6414kN
28.Rxf6
+- (5.41) Depth: 15 00:03:30 38948kN
28.Rxf6
+- (5.80) Depth: 15 00:09:38 117mN
28.Rxf6
+- (6.10) Depth: 16 00:21:25 275mN
28.Rxf6
+- (6.48) Depth: 17 01:09:31 1355mN
28.Rxf6
+- (6.68) Depth: 18 01:56:35 2047mN
-
Ovyron
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Will your Rybka 3 play this move?
Because it was played by Rybka 4 BETA.tjfroh wrote:No it won't. Why would it? That would make a win into a possible draw.
-
M ANSARI
- Posts: 3707
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:10 pm
Re: Will your Rybka 3 play this move?
This was not Rybka 4 beta but a version that is using an experimental Rybka cluster setup using several computers. I am still not sure what system Vas is using but it will be very interesting to find out. I am actually quite surprised that he managed to make the thing work on such a short time frame. Vas is always full of surprises 
-
Ovyron
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Will your Rybka 3 play this move?
From Rybka Forum:
Is this Cluster Rybka?!Kullberg wrote:The new Rybka version runs on my little cluster.
It consists of 5 8 core computers - 1 master and 4 slaves. So we have atm 40 cores in total.
There is one Skulltrail 3.8 GHz
another Skulltrail 4.2 GHz
one 2x X5460 @ 3.4 GHz
one 2x X5365 3 GHz
one 2x E5430 @ 3 GHz
all computers have 8 GB of memory each
-
Eelco de Groot
- Posts: 4565
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
- Full name:
Re: Will your Rybka 3 play this move?
It is Skynet!Ovyron wrote:From Rybka Forum:
Is this Cluster Rybka?!Kullberg wrote:The new Rybka version runs on my little cluster.
It consists of 5 8 core computers - 1 master and 4 slaves. So we have atm 40 cores in total.
There is one Skulltrail 3.8 GHz
another Skulltrail 4.2 GHz
one 2x X5460 @ 3.4 GHz
one 2x X5365 3 GHz
one 2x E5430 @ 3 GHz
all computers have 8 GB of memory each
Skynet 5b military satellite launched in 2004 on a Ariane V rocket
T4 army
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
-
Ovyron
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Will your Rybka 3 play this move?
Lol, these machines look bored of playing chess 
Anyway, save the bugs this cluster Rybka may be doing some novel process on trying to use the 4 slave computers like a Centaur.
Anyway, save the bugs this cluster Rybka may be doing some novel process on trying to use the 4 slave computers like a Centaur.