Hello
For more information about Rybka 3's benchmarks :
http://www.sedatchess.com/hardwares.html
Best Regards,
Sedat Canbaz
Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Antalya/Turkey
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
Thanks a million Sedat
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:34 am
Re: Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
ok ? but ? conversion ELO rating ?
I have a old, but enough for me... intel 820 D, with 2 GB ram... in 2,8 Ghz... have 50~70 Kn/s... in supermegaoverclocking ( and power Wats stupid cost)... 3.5 Ghz... up 70-90 Kn/s
but I use this computer a lot of time in 2,1 Ghz... on underclocking ¡ to have a good ratio power Watts and silent dB... 50 Watts...
it´s down to 20-50 Kn/s...
do somebody know have many ELO rating have my old ( but enough for me ) in this situation: 20-45 Kn/s ? and how many it´s the diferent to use deep or single version engine in this configuration ?
(I think that r3 (human-dinamic) is even stronger than other engines, in spite of that case so castrated in speed cpu.)
how is the conversion ELO rating ~ Kn/s speed ?
bye and thanks. Oliver.
PD: I also think that "a lot of people" overvalue the analysis capacity and (the elo ascents) rating in function of the kn/s in engine r3... but it should exist a table-dates of quite precise and exact conversion that relates, elo-kn/s-plys
I have a old, but enough for me... intel 820 D, with 2 GB ram... in 2,8 Ghz... have 50~70 Kn/s... in supermegaoverclocking ( and power Wats stupid cost)... 3.5 Ghz... up 70-90 Kn/s
but I use this computer a lot of time in 2,1 Ghz... on underclocking ¡ to have a good ratio power Watts and silent dB... 50 Watts...
it´s down to 20-50 Kn/s...
do somebody know have many ELO rating have my old ( but enough for me ) in this situation: 20-45 Kn/s ? and how many it´s the diferent to use deep or single version engine in this configuration ?
(I think that r3 (human-dinamic) is even stronger than other engines, in spite of that case so castrated in speed cpu.)
how is the conversion ELO rating ~ Kn/s speed ?
bye and thanks. Oliver.
PD: I also think that "a lot of people" overvalue the analysis capacity and (the elo ascents) rating in function of the kn/s in engine r3... but it should exist a table-dates of quite precise and exact conversion that relates, elo-kn/s-plys
-
- Posts: 2071
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:40 am
- Location: Dune
Re: Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
I wonder what score the 40-core monster from the Rybka team would get.
As for me on my not-yet-overclocked Q9650 I'm getting around the same score as the Q6600 running at 3ghz.
As for me on my not-yet-overclocked Q9650 I'm getting around the same score as the Q6600 running at 3ghz.
-
- Posts: 3707
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:10 pm
Re: Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
I played some games on PC using 8 core 4.8 Ghz. Maybe around 50 games or so. I wonder what the Kns was for that was on the server? I also Fritzmarked it at 5 Ghz and it had by far the highest score I have ever seen for Skulltrail (not sure exactly what it was). I have stopped playing since my internet connection is making it impossible to play even one game without disconnect. Hopefully once the fiber connection in our area is up and running I can run it again. By then maybe a 16 core Skulltrail will be available
-
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Antalya/Turkey
Re: Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
M ANSARI wrote:I played some games on PC using 8 core 4.8 Ghz. Maybe around 50 games or so. I wonder what the Kns was for that was on the server? I also Fritzmarked it at 5 Ghz and it had by far the highest score I have ever seen for Skulltrail (not sure exactly what it was). I have stopped playing since my internet connection is making it impossible to play even one game without disconnect. Hopefully once the fiber connection in our area is up and running I can run it again. By then maybe a 16 core Skulltrail will be available
Hello Majd,
Its no problem...i think we can do it in another way
I have a offer to you,lets play some no rated games on playchess server, so then i can look at the Rybka3's kns of your super fast Skulltrail 4.8 Ghz.
Best,
Sedat
-
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Antalya/Turkey
Re: Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
Right now i have updated the Intel 5x8 Harpertown 40 core cluster's kn/s results:
http://www.sedatchess.com/hardwares.html
Regards,
Sedat
http://www.sedatchess.com/hardwares.html
Regards,
Sedat
-
- Posts: 2071
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:40 am
- Location: Dune
Re: Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
Oh My ...1663kN/s Intel 5x8 Harpertown Cluster (40 CPUs) Lukas
That's over 700% faster than my stock Q9650 (4 cores) !!!
I wish I could have that cluster
-
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Antalya/Turkey
Re: Rybka 3 BenchMarks on Different Hardwares !
Yes...this is just incredible,the fastest top hardware on the planet !Leto wrote:Oh My ...1663kN/s Intel 5x8 Harpertown Cluster (40 CPUs) Lukas
That's over 700% faster than my stock Q9650 (4 cores) !!!
I wish I could have that cluster
It seems like Rybka !
And its about 600% faster than my Intel QX9650 @3.00GHz 3806MHz
Best,
Sedat