Test Position--too easy for over priced commercials

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Werewolf
Posts: 1797
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm

Re: Test Position--too easy for over priced commercials

Post by Werewolf »

Here are my findings all on 2.33GHz Core 2 duo laptop

Deep Junior 10: 7 seconds!
Rybka 3: 10 seconds
Deep Sjeng WC2008: 10 seconds
Fritz 9: 16 seconds (good result!)
HIARCS Padderborn 2007: 1 minute
Zappa Mexico II: 1 min 13
HIARCS 10: 2 min 1
Fritz 11: 2 min 52 (F11 is shockingly bad at tactics)
HIARCS 12.1: 3 min 28 (How fast is your laptop Harvey?!)
Deep Shredder 11: 4 min 23
Naum 3.1: 9min 29


The big shocks here were H12.1 & F11. Naum 3.1 is thankfully replaced by Naum 4 - I don't have it - but from what I've read it'd probably be quite quick. Great result from Deep Junior 10, looking forward to v11...
User avatar
Harvey Williamson
Posts: 2011
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
Full name: Harvey Williamson

Re: Test Position--too easy for over priced commercials

Post by Harvey Williamson »

slow 1.8x2
Spock

Re: Test Position--too easy for over priced commercials

Post by Spock »

Are those times when the GUI prints the analysis line, or when you see the engine first looking at that move ?
Werewolf
Posts: 1797
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm

Re: Test Position--too easy for over priced commercials

Post by Werewolf »

It's when the GUI prints the analysis line in F11 interface.
Spock

Re: Test Position--too easy for over priced commercials

Post by Spock »

Here, Hiarcs 12.1 on a single core at 2.9Ghz, takes 1:22 to give it +1.12 initially, but then 2:39 to give it +5.89

Multi-cores really helps no doubt

Code: Select all

 10/27	 0:01 	+0.68 	1.Bd2 c5 2.Rh1 Bg5 3.Rd3 Qe7 4.Bxg5 Qxg5 5.Bxa4 bxa4 6.bxc5 Rec8 (594.965) 423
 11/27	 0:03 	+0.68 	1.Bd2 g5 2.Rd3 Qc8 3.Rd5 Bd6 4.Bxa4 bxa4 5.Rh1 Qd8 6.c4 Qf6 (1.567.129) 414
 12/28	 0:07 	+0.72 	1.Bd2 g5 2.Rd3 Qc8 3.Rd5 Bf6 4.Bxa4 c6 5.Rc5 bxa4 6.Ra5 Rd8 7.Be3 Qb7 8.Rxa4 (3.215.249) 417
 13/29	 0:17 	+0.82 	1.Bd2 g5 2.Rd1 Nb2 3.Rh1 Nc4 4.Bxc4 bxc4 5.Bc1 (7.327.082) 419
 14/30	 0:27 	+0.79 	1.Bd2 g5 2.Rd1 Nb2 3.Rh1 c5 4.Bd5 Rc8 5.Bxg5 Bxg5 6.Qxb2 Rf8 (11.927.215) 428
 14/31	 0:33 	+0.80 	1.Rd3 (14.506.580) 427
 14/33	 0:41 	+1.03 	1.Rd3 Qc8 2.g5 Rd8 3.Rxd8 Qxd8 4.Bxa4 bxa4 5.gxh6 gxh6 6.Be3 Qd7 7.Qc4 Kg7 8.Rh1 g5 9.Qd5 Qxd5 (17.638.985) 427
 15/36	 1:05 	+1.11 	1.Rd3 Qc8 2.g5 Rd8 3.Rf3 Rf8 4.Rxf8 Bxf8 5.Qf3 Qd7 6.Ba3 Bd6 7.Rd1 Rd8 8.gxh6 gxh6 9.Rh1 Qg7 10.Bc1 (28.249.524) 431
 15/36	 1:22 	+1.12 	1.Bxh6 (35.860.605) 432
 15/36	 1:26 	+1.28++	1.Bxh6 (37.693.935) 433
 15/45	 2:39 	+5.89 	1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Rf7+ Kh8 3.Rd1 Nb6 4.Rxd8 Raxd8 5.Qe3 Bg5 6.f4 Be7 7.fxe5 Bg5 8.Qc5 (70.410.823) 442
Spock

Re: Test Position--too easy for over priced commercials

Post by Spock »

Indeed, lightning fast for Hiarcs 12.1 on 4 cores, impressive

Code: Select all

 11/30	 0:01 	+0.82 	1.Bd2 Qd6 2.Rd3 Qb6 3.Be3 Qb7 4.Rh1 Red8 5.f3 c6 6.Qd2 Rxd3 7.Qxd3 (1.826.944) 1296
 12/31	 0:04 	+0.74 	1.Bd2 g5 2.Rd1 (5.915.499) 1387
 13/33	 0:06 	+0.80 	1.Bd2 c5 2.Rh1 c4 3.Bxa4 (9.278.843) 1429
 13/33	 0:07 	+0.81 	1.Rd3 (10.816.928) 1437
 13/33	 0:08 	+0.98 	1.Rd3 Qc8 2.g5 c5 3.Bd5 Rb8 4.gxh6 (11.974.253) 1441
 13/33	 0:09 	+0.99++	1.Bxh6 (13.633.244) 1454
 13/40	 0:15 	+5.46 	1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Rd1 Bf8 3.Rxd8 Rexd8 4.Bxa4 bxa4 5.Rf7+ Bg7 6.Rxc7 Rd6 7.c4 Rad8 8.Qf3 (23.598.482) 1556
 14/40	 0:16 	+5.23 	1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Rd1 Bf8 3.Rxd8 Rexd8 4.Bxa4 bxa4 5.Rf7+ Bg7 6.Rxc7 Rd6 7.Qe3 Rad8 8.Qa7 Rg8 9.c4 (26.473.429) 1565
 15/40	 0:21 	+5.48++	1.Bxh6 (34.441.719) 1588
 15/42	 0:30 	+6.22 	1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Rf7+ Kg8 3.Rd1 Kh8 4.Rxd8 Raxd8 5.Bxa4 (49.120.884) 1617
 16/46	 0:40 	+6.44 	1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Rf7+ Kh8 3.Rd1 Bf8 4.Rxd8 Rexd8 5.Qf3 (66.139.494) 1630
 17/48	 1:05 	+6.67 	1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Rf7+ Kh8 3.Rd1 Rc8 4.Rxd8 Rcxd8 5.Qe3 Bg5 6.Qa7 (104.854.420) 1594
 

bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Test Position--too easy for over priced commercials

Post by bob »

kgburcham wrote:Bxh6
[D] r2qr3/2p1b1pk/p5pp/1p2p3/nP2P1P1/1BP2RP1/P3QPK1/R1B5 w - - 0 1
Takes crafty a bit of time:

Code: Select all

               19     1:12   1.39   1. Bd2 Bg5 2. Rd3 Qf6 3. Rd1 Bxd2 4.
                                    Qxd2 g5 5. Rf3 Qd8 6. Bd5 Rb8 7. Qc1
                                    Qe7 8. Rf7 Qd6 9. c4 c5 10. cxb5 axb5
                                    (s=2)
               19     1:49   1.46   1. Bxh6 gxh6 2. Rf7+ Kh8 3. Rh1 Bg5
                                    4. Rd1 Nxc3 5. Rxd8 Nxe2 6. Rdd7 Re7
                                    7. Rfxe7 Bxe7 8. Rxe7 Nd4 9. Rxc7 Nxb3
                                    10. axb3 Rd8
               19->   1:49   1.46   1. Bxh6 gxh6 2. Rf7+ Kh8 3. Rh1 Bg5
                                    4. Rd1 Nxc3 5. Rxd8 Nxe2 6. Rdd7 Re7
                                    7. Rfxe7 Bxe7 8. Rxe7 Nd4 9. Rxc7 Nxb3
                                    10. axb3 Rd8 (s=2)
               20     2:02     +1   1. Bxh6!!
               20     2:32     +3   1. Bxh6!!
               20     3:37   4.52   1. Bxh6 gxh6 2. Rd1 Bd6 3. Rf7+ Kh8
                                    4. Qe3 g5 5. Rh1 Bf8 6. Qf3 Qd6 7.
                                    Qf5 Bg7 8. Qxg5 <HT>
               20->   3&#58;39   4.52   1. Bxh6 gxh6 2. Rd1 Bd6 3. Rf7+ Kh8
                                    4. Qe3 g5 5. Rh1 Bf8 6. Qf3 Qd6 7.
                                    Qf5 Bg7 8. Qxg5 <HT>