It is very easy and I found it almost instantly. No need to test programs with this problem unless they are very weak.yanquis1972 wrote:[d]8/2p2p2/p1N2k1P/8/1P6/P3K3/8/5b2 w - - 1 44
FEN: 8/2p2p2/p1N2k1P/8/1P6/P3K3/8/5b2 w - - 1 44
carlsen here played Ne5! winning.
test position (carlsen-jakowenko 7/2/2009)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: test position (carlsen-jakowenko 7/2/2009)
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: test position (carlsen-jakowenko 7/2/2009)
Problem is both moves are based on the same idea, the knight can't be taken by the king else the h-pawn runs in and promotes...Terry McCracken wrote:It is very easy and I found it almost instantly. No need to test programs with this problem unless they are very weak.yanquis1972 wrote:[d]8/2p2p2/p1N2k1P/8/1P6/P3K3/8/5b2 w - - 1 44
FEN: 8/2p2p2/p1N2k1P/8/1P6/P3K3/8/5b2 w - - 1 44
carlsen here played Ne5! winning.
Re: test position (carlsen-jakowenko 7/2/2009)
I wouldn't say that - Deep Shredder 11 on a quad isn't exactly weak, and it gives +4.82 for Ne7.Terry McCracken wrote: It is very easy and I found it almost instantly. No need to test programs with this problem unless they are very weak.
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: test position (carlsen-jakowenko 7/2/2009)
There are two moves that win almost equally on first sight Ne5 and Ne7, I suppose Ne5 is more flexable. Other than the two moves this isnt all that interesting for computers. It is instructive for intermediate players however.Spock wrote:I wouldn't say that - Deep Shredder 11 on a quad isn't exactly weak, and it gives +4.82 for Ne7.Terry McCracken wrote: It is very easy and I found it almost instantly. No need to test programs with this problem unless they are very weak.
Terry McCracken