How to kill Naum 4, playing you WITHOUT YOUR QUEEN !!! 2009

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c

Post by bob »

It is much simpler than that. If a program does not have _specific_ code to help it avoid blocked pawn structures, a program will gladly gobble material and walk right into forced draws. If one plays enough on ICC, this problem becomes one that is recognized. I spent a lot of time working on Crafty to avoid this specific problem, which is no longer a problem today for it because of the eval changes to help it recognize that the more blocked the pawns become, the more drawish the position becomes, regardless of other considerations.

Not all programs are very good at this, as they are not developed in an environment where they encounter this problem with any frequency.
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: . sure.... the responsable of all is the lag :lol: :lo

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Father wrote:Naum 4 4-cpu: 17.6 plies; 2.394kN/s AMD Phenom(tm) 9750 Quad-Core Processor 2411MHz, (4 CPUs) Your claim has been accepted :D :D :D :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

... sure.... the responsable of all is the lag :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

ever :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


[Event "Rated game, 3m + 0s"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2009.08.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Father"]
[Black "Silver Stacy"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D00"]
[WhiteElo "2076"]
[BlackElo "2543"]
[Annotator "RESTREPO,PABLO"]
[PlyCount "67"]
[EventDate "2009.08.27"]
[BlackTeam "Naum 4 4-cpu: 17.6 plies; 2.394kN/s AMD Pheno"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. d4 {2} Nf6 {0} 2. e3 {0.01/0 0} d5 {0.01/0 0} 3. c3 {0} Nc6 {-0.34/16 4} 4.
f4 {0 (Nf3)} Bf5 {9} 5. Nf3 {-0.37/16 0} e6 {8} 6. Bd3 {-0.31/16 0 (Bb5)} Be7 {
5} 7. O-O {-0.37/15 0 (Qc2)} O-O {-0.38/15 1} 8. Qe2 {10} Ne4 {-0.28/16 0} 9.
Re1 {1 (Nbd2)} Bg4 {-0.53/13 4} 10. Nbd2 {1 (Qc2)} f5 {-0.52/14 2} 11. Nf1 {0
(Bb5)} Bh4 {-0.71/11 3} 12. g3 {3} Be7 {-0.81/14 0} 13. Qd1 {1 (Qg2)} Rf6 {-0.
85/12 3} 14. Be2 {0 (N1d2)} Rg6 {3} 15. N3d2 {-0.73/15 0 (N1d2)} Nd6 {-0.83/15
4} 16. Bxg4 {2 (Nf3)} Rxg4 {3} 17. Re2 {-0.13/15 0 (e4)} Qd7 {4} 18. Rg2 {-1.
03/14 0 (Nf3)} a6 {2} 19. Nf3 {-1.08/13 0} a5 {-0.84/15 3} 20. Qe2 {2 (Ne5)} a4
{-0.85/15 4} 21. a3 {1 (N1d2)} b6 {-1.04/14 2} 22. Bd2 {1 (N1d2)} Nc4 {4} 23.
Be1 {-1.00/14 0 (Bc1)} b5 {-0.91/13 2} 24. Rc1 {1 (Rb1)} Rg6 {-0.90/13 2} 25.
Rc2 {1 (Rb1)} Rb8 {-0.93/14 2} 26. h4 {1 (N1d2)} Bf6 {-0.95/13 3} 27. Kh1 {1
(N1d2)} Qe8 {-0.93/14 5} 28. Kh2 {0 (N1d2)} Nd6 {-0.98/14 2} 29. Kh1 {0 (N1d2)}
Na5 {-0.96/14 2} 30. Kg1 {0 (N1d2)} Nac4 {-1.08/14 2} 31. Kh1 {1 (N1d2)} c6 {
-1.08/12 2} 32. Kh2 {1 (N1d2)} Rg4 {-1.10/14 2} 33. Kh1 {1 (N1d2)} Rc8 {-1.06/
12 1} 34. N3h2 {2 (Lag: Av=1.13s, max=23.1s)} 1-0

[D]2r1q1k1/6pp/2pnpb2/1p1p1p2/p1nP1PrP/P1P1P1P1/1PR1Q1RN/4BN1K b - - 0 34
Ja,ja,ja,ja,whatever....another stupid win on time....Keep them coming Pablo....
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

bob wrote:It is much simpler than that. If a program does not have _specific_ code to help it avoid blocked pawn structures, a program will gladly gobble material and walk right into forced draws. If one plays enough on ICC, this problem becomes one that is recognized. I spent a lot of time working on Crafty to avoid this specific problem, which is no longer a problem today for it because of the eval changes to help it recognize that the more blocked the pawns become, the more drawish the position becomes, regardless of other considerations.

Not all programs are very good at this, as they are not developed in an environment where they encounter this problem with any frequency.
Thanks Bob for the statement....Can Pablo beat Crafty then :!:
The answer is yes when cows begin to fly :lol:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Damir
Posts: 2801
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: Denmark
Full name: Damir Desevac

Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c

Post by Damir »

do cows fly? I thought it was the pigs... :lol: :lol: :lol:
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c

Post by bob »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
bob wrote:It is much simpler than that. If a program does not have _specific_ code to help it avoid blocked pawn structures, a program will gladly gobble material and walk right into forced draws. If one plays enough on ICC, this problem becomes one that is recognized. I spent a lot of time working on Crafty to avoid this specific problem, which is no longer a problem today for it because of the eval changes to help it recognize that the more blocked the pawns become, the more drawish the position becomes, regardless of other considerations.

Not all programs are very good at this, as they are not developed in an environment where they encounter this problem with any frequency.
Thanks Bob for the statement....Can Pablo beat Crafty then :!:
The answer is yes when cows begin to fly :lol:
I won't go that far. It is very hard to block up the pawn structure, but then again it was also very difficult to beat Crafty with the infamous trojan horse attack by sacrificing a knight or bishop on the g-file. I fixed that only to lose when the opponent sacrificed a rook on the same file. I fixed that only to lose a few games where the same opponent figured out how to sacrifice a queen the same way. :)

I would never say a problem is fixed, just "improved".
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c

Post by bob »

Damir wrote:do cows fly? I thought it was the pigs... :lol: :lol: :lol:
In the movie "Twister" cows flew. :) So it will happen given the right weather conditions...
Father
Posts: 1391
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:39 am
Location: Colombia
Full name: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo

diamons and stones ...I claim for 4.000 elo at leats ...

Post by Father »

... in fact, there are cualitative victories, and clasical wars... What had sayed the population in 1915, or son, when the great Jose Raul Capablanca was over the waves on the sea, if one of the oponents of these that he had the costumer to offer a rock in advatage, If a simple amateur would had sayed to the World Chess champion, the great machine (for me a real paradigm)... "Mister Capablanca: ok take my Quen for your bishop, and one of my rooks for one of your knight", and then after the moves, the amateur won, and the Chess World lost...?
In fact that was the situation playing against the Naum 4 ... I won, a player over 3.000 elo....then I wonder... What the Math are ? :shock:
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41472
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: diamons and stones ...I claim for 4.000 elo at leats ...

Post by Graham Banks »

Father wrote:... in fact, there are cualitative victories, and clasical wars... What had sayed the population in 1915, or son, when the great Jose Raul Capablanca was over the waves on the sea, if one of the oponents of these that he had the costumer to offer a rock in advatage, If a simple amateur would had sayed to the World Chess champion, the great machine (for me a real paradigm)... "Mister Capablanca: ok take my Quen for your bishop, and one of my rooks for one of your knight", and then after the moves, the amateur won, and the Chess World lost...?
In fact that was the situation playing against the Naum 4 ... I won, a player over 3.000 elo....then I wonder... What the Math are ? :shock:
Wasn't a proper win though.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: How to kill Naum 4, playing you WITHOUT YOUR QUEEN !!! 2

Post by S.Taylor »

I could probably beat Kasparov with rook odds (ME playing without my KR). :lol:
(According to all this)
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: diamons and stones ...I claim for 4.000 elo at leats ...

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Graham Banks wrote:
Father wrote:... in fact, there are cualitative victories, and clasical wars... What had sayed the population in 1915, or son, when the great Jose Raul Capablanca was over the waves on the sea, if one of the oponents of these that he had the costumer to offer a rock in advatage, If a simple amateur would had sayed to the World Chess champion, the great machine (for me a real paradigm)... "Mister Capablanca: ok take my Quen for your bishop, and one of my rooks for one of your knight", and then after the moves, the amateur won, and the Chess World lost...?
In fact that was the situation playing against the Naum 4 ... I won, a player over 3.000 elo....then I wonder... What the Math are ? :shock:
Wasn't a proper win though.
He's a hopeless case Graham,he's confused when it comes to this statement:
A stupid win on time because of a more stupid server software bug :D
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….