It is much simpler than that. If a program does not have _specific_ code to help it avoid blocked pawn structures, a program will gladly gobble material and walk right into forced draws. If one plays enough on ICC, this problem becomes one that is recognized. I spent a lot of time working on Crafty to avoid this specific problem, which is no longer a problem today for it because of the eval changes to help it recognize that the more blocked the pawns become, the more drawish the position becomes, regardless of other considerations.
Not all programs are very good at this, as they are not developed in an environment where they encounter this problem with any frequency.
How to kill Naum 4, playing you WITHOUT YOUR QUEEN !!! 2009
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: . sure.... the responsable of all is the lag :lol: :lo
Ja,ja,ja,ja,whatever....another stupid win on time....Keep them coming Pablo....Father wrote:Naum 4 4-cpu: 17.6 plies; 2.394kN/s AMD Phenom(tm) 9750 Quad-Core Processor 2411MHz, (4 CPUs) Your claim has been accepted
... sure.... the responsable of all is the lag
ever
[Event "Rated game, 3m + 0s"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2009.08.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Father"]
[Black "Silver Stacy"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D00"]
[WhiteElo "2076"]
[BlackElo "2543"]
[Annotator "RESTREPO,PABLO"]
[PlyCount "67"]
[EventDate "2009.08.27"]
[BlackTeam "Naum 4 4-cpu: 17.6 plies; 2.394kN/s AMD Pheno"]
[TimeControl "180"]
1. d4 {2} Nf6 {0} 2. e3 {0.01/0 0} d5 {0.01/0 0} 3. c3 {0} Nc6 {-0.34/16 4} 4.
f4 {0 (Nf3)} Bf5 {9} 5. Nf3 {-0.37/16 0} e6 {8} 6. Bd3 {-0.31/16 0 (Bb5)} Be7 {
5} 7. O-O {-0.37/15 0 (Qc2)} O-O {-0.38/15 1} 8. Qe2 {10} Ne4 {-0.28/16 0} 9.
Re1 {1 (Nbd2)} Bg4 {-0.53/13 4} 10. Nbd2 {1 (Qc2)} f5 {-0.52/14 2} 11. Nf1 {0
(Bb5)} Bh4 {-0.71/11 3} 12. g3 {3} Be7 {-0.81/14 0} 13. Qd1 {1 (Qg2)} Rf6 {-0.
85/12 3} 14. Be2 {0 (N1d2)} Rg6 {3} 15. N3d2 {-0.73/15 0 (N1d2)} Nd6 {-0.83/15
4} 16. Bxg4 {2 (Nf3)} Rxg4 {3} 17. Re2 {-0.13/15 0 (e4)} Qd7 {4} 18. Rg2 {-1.
03/14 0 (Nf3)} a6 {2} 19. Nf3 {-1.08/13 0} a5 {-0.84/15 3} 20. Qe2 {2 (Ne5)} a4
{-0.85/15 4} 21. a3 {1 (N1d2)} b6 {-1.04/14 2} 22. Bd2 {1 (N1d2)} Nc4 {4} 23.
Be1 {-1.00/14 0 (Bc1)} b5 {-0.91/13 2} 24. Rc1 {1 (Rb1)} Rg6 {-0.90/13 2} 25.
Rc2 {1 (Rb1)} Rb8 {-0.93/14 2} 26. h4 {1 (N1d2)} Bf6 {-0.95/13 3} 27. Kh1 {1
(N1d2)} Qe8 {-0.93/14 5} 28. Kh2 {0 (N1d2)} Nd6 {-0.98/14 2} 29. Kh1 {0 (N1d2)}
Na5 {-0.96/14 2} 30. Kg1 {0 (N1d2)} Nac4 {-1.08/14 2} 31. Kh1 {1 (N1d2)} c6 {
-1.08/12 2} 32. Kh2 {1 (N1d2)} Rg4 {-1.10/14 2} 33. Kh1 {1 (N1d2)} Rc8 {-1.06/
12 1} 34. N3h2 {2 (Lag: Av=1.13s, max=23.1s)} 1-0
[D]2r1q1k1/6pp/2pnpb2/1p1p1p2/p1nP1PrP/P1P1P1P1/1PR1Q1RN/4BN1K b - - 0 34
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c
Thanks Bob for the statement....Can Pablo beat Crafty thenbob wrote:It is much simpler than that. If a program does not have _specific_ code to help it avoid blocked pawn structures, a program will gladly gobble material and walk right into forced draws. If one plays enough on ICC, this problem becomes one that is recognized. I spent a lot of time working on Crafty to avoid this specific problem, which is no longer a problem today for it because of the eval changes to help it recognize that the more blocked the pawns become, the more drawish the position becomes, regardless of other considerations.
Not all programs are very good at this, as they are not developed in an environment where they encounter this problem with any frequency.
The answer is yes when cows begin to fly
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c
do cows fly? I thought it was the pigs...
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c
I won't go that far. It is very hard to block up the pawn structure, but then again it was also very difficult to beat Crafty with the infamous trojan horse attack by sacrificing a knight or bishop on the g-file. I fixed that only to lose when the opponent sacrificed a rook on the same file. I fixed that only to lose a few games where the same opponent figured out how to sacrifice a queen the same way.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Thanks Bob for the statement....Can Pablo beat Crafty thenbob wrote:It is much simpler than that. If a program does not have _specific_ code to help it avoid blocked pawn structures, a program will gladly gobble material and walk right into forced draws. If one plays enough on ICC, this problem becomes one that is recognized. I spent a lot of time working on Crafty to avoid this specific problem, which is no longer a problem today for it because of the eval changes to help it recognize that the more blocked the pawns become, the more drawish the position becomes, regardless of other considerations.
Not all programs are very good at this, as they are not developed in an environment where they encounter this problem with any frequency.
The answer is yes when cows begin to fly
I would never say a problem is fixed, just "improved".
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: easier beat a computer over the desk that in playchess.c
In the movie "Twister" cows flew. So it will happen given the right weather conditions...Damir wrote:do cows fly? I thought it was the pigs...
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:39 am
- Location: Colombia
- Full name: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
diamons and stones ...I claim for 4.000 elo at leats ...
... in fact, there are cualitative victories, and clasical wars... What had sayed the population in 1915, or son, when the great Jose Raul Capablanca was over the waves on the sea, if one of the oponents of these that he had the costumer to offer a rock in advatage, If a simple amateur would had sayed to the World Chess champion, the great machine (for me a real paradigm)... "Mister Capablanca: ok take my Quen for your bishop, and one of my rooks for one of your knight", and then after the moves, the amateur won, and the Chess World lost...?
In fact that was the situation playing against the Naum 4 ... I won, a player over 3.000 elo....then I wonder... What the Math are ?
In fact that was the situation playing against the Naum 4 ... I won, a player over 3.000 elo....then I wonder... What the Math are ?
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
-
- Posts: 41472
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: diamons and stones ...I claim for 4.000 elo at leats ...
Wasn't a proper win though.Father wrote:... in fact, there are cualitative victories, and clasical wars... What had sayed the population in 1915, or son, when the great Jose Raul Capablanca was over the waves on the sea, if one of the oponents of these that he had the costumer to offer a rock in advatage, If a simple amateur would had sayed to the World Chess champion, the great machine (for me a real paradigm)... "Mister Capablanca: ok take my Quen for your bishop, and one of my rooks for one of your knight", and then after the moves, the amateur won, and the Chess World lost...?
In fact that was the situation playing against the Naum 4 ... I won, a player over 3.000 elo....then I wonder... What the Math are ?
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: How to kill Naum 4, playing you WITHOUT YOUR QUEEN !!! 2
I could probably beat Kasparov with rook odds (ME playing without my KR).
(According to all this)
(According to all this)
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: diamons and stones ...I claim for 4.000 elo at leats ...
He's a hopeless case Graham,he's confused when it comes to this statement:Graham Banks wrote:Wasn't a proper win though.Father wrote:... in fact, there are cualitative victories, and clasical wars... What had sayed the population in 1915, or son, when the great Jose Raul Capablanca was over the waves on the sea, if one of the oponents of these that he had the costumer to offer a rock in advatage, If a simple amateur would had sayed to the World Chess champion, the great machine (for me a real paradigm)... "Mister Capablanca: ok take my Quen for your bishop, and one of my rooks for one of your knight", and then after the moves, the amateur won, and the Chess World lost...?
In fact that was the situation playing against the Naum 4 ... I won, a player over 3.000 elo....then I wonder... What the Math are ?
A stupid win on time because of a more stupid server software bug
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….