It is not , it is an Italian surname (In Spanish would be "Roberto Pescador")Christopher Conkie wrote:Good spot. It is indeed.jwes wrote:Do you think it is a coincidence that Roberto Pescatore is a Spanish transliteration of Bobby Fischer ?Michel wrote:Some googling reveals that Yakov Petrovich Golyadkin is a Dostojevsky character.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Double ... sburg_Poem
Roberto Pescatore seems to be a common name.
Christopher
About Clones or Supposed Clones
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 11:07 pm
- Location: Almeria. SPAIN
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Saludos, Andres
-
- Posts: 6073
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Right thats it No more English for you, only Gaelic from now on.Andres Valverde wrote:It is not , it is an Italian surname (In Spanish would be "Roberto Pescador")Christopher Conkie wrote:Good spot. It is indeed.jwes wrote:Do you think it is a coincidence that Roberto Pescatore is a Spanish transliteration of Bobby Fischer ?Michel wrote:Some googling reveals that Yakov Petrovich Golyadkin is a Dostojevsky character.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Double ... sburg_Poem
Roberto Pescatore seems to be a common name.
Christopher
Chris
-
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:51 am
- Location: Earth
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Not sure what you mean here. Rybka was actually _even closer_ to Fruit than Strelka was. There were only a few differences really, and in almost all cases Strelka was just simplified a bit from Rybka.Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:Correct. Like Strelka, it appears the gaps have been filled in with parts from other programs.M ANSARI wrote:The stolen software mentioned is not complete. It is missing a large part of the code that has been left out or still not disassembled yet.
Of course, Strelka 1.0 (which I still don't have actually) had an xboard parser from Beowulf...
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Oh, there's lot's of proof. Ippolit is a well known clone. Anyone argues differently is a clown.Sergei Markoff wrote:So, according to your statements, you're probably think that you have a right to offend everyone without any proof. And after it you're saying something about justice?Terry McCracken wrote:Go ahead, "Make My Day!" elohssa..
Attack of The Clone Clowns Regards...
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 6073
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Terry.Terry McCracken wrote:Oh, there's lot's of proof. Ippolit is a well known clone. Anyone argues differently is a clown.Sergei Markoff wrote:So, according to your statements, you're probably think that you have a right to offend everyone without any proof. And after it you're saying something about justice?Terry McCracken wrote:Go ahead, "Make My Day!" elohssa..
Attack of The Clone Clowns Regards...
CTF is that way. OK?
No need for that.
Christopher
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Interesting proof. But unfortunately I never said that Ippolit is not a clone.Terry McCracken wrote:Oh, there's lot's of proof. Ippolit is a well known clone. Anyone argues differently is a clown.
What else 'evidence' of stoling something by me you have?
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Oh, really, I forgot one. At Ippolit page you see some cyrillic texts.Sergei Markoff wrote:What else 'evidence' of stoling something by me you have?
Also it's probably, that at some time some men from the Russia steal something. And also in the Russia was Stalin (he was from Georgia, but he was in Russia).
And I'm also from Russia. So, it's clear that I am a thief.
This is your evidence?
-
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:00 pm
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Here it seems the opposite, i.e. Rybka 3 seems to have some differences where Ippolit uses Fruit code.Zach Wegner wrote:Not sure what you mean here. Rybka was actually _even closer_ to Fruit than Strelka was.
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
I never said it was you, did I?Sergei Markoff wrote:Interesting proof. But unfortunately I never said that Ippolit is not a clone.Terry McCracken wrote:Oh, there's lot's of proof. Ippolit is a well known clone. Anyone argues differently is a clown.
What else 'evidence' of stoling something by me you have?
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: About Clones or Supposed Clones
Just a little joke Chris. Don't take it so seriously.Christopher Conkie wrote:Terry.Terry McCracken wrote:Oh, there's lot's of proof. Ippolit is a well known clone. Anyone argues differently is a clown.Sergei Markoff wrote:So, according to your statements, you're probably think that you have a right to offend everyone without any proof. And after it you're saying something about justice?Terry McCracken wrote:Go ahead, "Make My Day!" elohssa..
Attack of The Clone Clowns Regards...
CTF is that way. OK?
No need for that.
Christopher
Terry McCracken