Stockfish Jim Ablett compiles (x64), against Rybka 3 (x64)
100 games, 2'+1", no ponder, 2-cpu, book PB-5moves
Fritz 11 GUI, XP Pro x64.
First stockfish-16-x64-ja.exe (23/12/2009, 267 KB)
Stockfish 1.6 JA - Rybka 3: +20 -41 =39, score 39.5-60.5 (-76 Elo)
Then stockfish-16s-x64-ja.exe (29/12/09, 273 KB)
Stockfish 1.6s JA - Rybka 3: +14 -51 =35, score 31.5-68.5 (-137 Elo)
Only 200 games, but the difference is big enough to call the "s" version a failure!
Sorry, Dann...
Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
Really? 1.6s seems equal to or slightly better than 1.6. Are you using the correct 1.6s version? Because some are good, and some are terrible.
Peter
Peter
-
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:07 am
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
Not enough games or something else is wrong with your setup.ernest wrote: Only 200 games, but the difference is big enough to call the "s" version a failure!
Sorry, Dann...
Please see my tournament:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 76&t=31379
-
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
Well, I have quoted what the version is... It is the correct JA compile!alpha123 wrote:Are you using the correct 1.6s version? Peter
-
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
...and what was the direct result of the games between those 3?Martin T wrote:Please see my tournament:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 76&t=31379
Code: Select all
01: Rybka 3 64-bit 112.5/175 64.29 9426.75
01: Stockfish 1.6s JA 64-bit 91.5/175 52.29 7785.25
01: Stockfish 1.6.JA 64-bit 90.0/175 51.43 7698.00
-
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:07 am
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
That is correct, no improvement to speak of (1.5 point more for "s" version could be statistical deviation). But my point was that it is certainly not worse, which is the impression you give in your original post in this thread.ernest wrote: ...and what was the direct result of the games between those 3?Anyway, even your result shows no improvement from the s versionCode: Select all
01: Rybka 3 64-bit 112.5/175 64.29 9426.75 01: Stockfish 1.6s JA 64-bit 91.5/175 52.29 7785.25 01: Stockfish 1.6.JA 64-bit 90.0/175 51.43 7698.00
The games between those 3:
Rybka 3 64-bit - Stockfish 1.6s JA 64-bit: 16.0 - 9.0
Rybka 3 64-bit - Stockfish 1.6 JA 64-bit: 15.5 - 9.5
Stockfish 1.6s JA 64-bit - Stockfish 1.6 JA 64-bit: 14.0 - 11.0
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:10 am
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
I want to do the same test with the 32-bit engines. Where do I get PB-5moves?ernest wrote:Stockfish Jim Ablett compiles (x64), against Rybka 3 (x64)
100 games, 2'+1", no ponder, 2-cpu, book PB-5moves
Fritz 11 GUI, XP Pro x64.
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:53 pm
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
Make sure you use this version for 32bit
Stockfish-1.6s-DC-(originalSmoothScaling)w32+x64.zip
http://www.mediafire.com/?2nwm1dozmco
Stockfish-1.6s-DC-(originalSmoothScaling)w32+x64.zip
http://www.mediafire.com/?2nwm1dozmco
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
-
- Posts: 2651
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:05 am
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
OK, you guys really need to get together and figure out what's going on here. Besides the confusion that this version is also labeled as Stockfish 1.6s, it definitely plays worse than the original Stockfish 1.6s version created by Dann that I obtained from the Stockfish32.exe.bz2 file.DomLeste wrote:Make sure you use this version for 32bit
Stockfish-1.6s-DC-(originalSmoothScaling)w32+x64.zip
http://www.mediafire.com/?2nwm1dozmco
For example, the Stockfish32.exe finds Nb5 here almost immediately:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31394
while this Stockfish-1.6s-DC version does not.
-
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:35 pm
Re: Stockfish 1.6s is a disaster, compared to 1.6
Actually you have not obtained the original Stockfish 1.6s 32 bit. But only the second one.parrish wrote:OK, you guys really need to get together and figure out what's going on here. Besides the confusion that this version is also labeled as Stockfish 1.6s, it definitely plays worse than the original Stockfish 1.6s version created by Dann that I obtained from the Stockfish32.exe.bz2 file.DomLeste wrote:Make sure you use this version for 32bit
Stockfish-1.6s-DC-(originalSmoothScaling)w32+x64.zip
http://www.mediafire.com/?2nwm1dozmco
For example, the Stockfish32.exe finds Nb5 here almost immediately:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31394
while this Stockfish-1.6s-DC version does not.
The original does not find Nb5 immediately. The second "smoother" one Dann provided finds it immediately.
The above link contains the original Stockfish 1.6s 32 bit, the one Dann has posted in the beginning.
After his son's birth they've asked him:
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....