I tried to implement a more aggressive and active playing style. But the result annoys me a bit:
[D]rnbqkb1r/pppppppp/5n2/8/3P4/8/PPP1PPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq -
Engine: ChessMind 0.72 (0 MB)
von metax
rnbqkb1r/pppppppp/5n2/8/3P4/8/PPP1PPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq -
Engine: ChessMind 0.72 (0 MB)
von metax
5.00 0:00 +0.91 2.e4 e5 3.dxe5 Sxe4 4.Sf3 Sc6 76
6.00 0:01 +0.84 2.e4 e5 3.dxe5 Sxe4 4.c3 Le7 5.b4 146
7.00 0:02 +0.85 2.e4 e5 3.dxe5 Sxe4 4.Dd4 Sc5 5.Sa3 b5 (547.606) 182
8.01 0:07 +0.50 2.e4 Sxe4 3.f3 Sd6 4.Sh3 Sc6 5.Sa3 b5
6.Sxb5 (1.538.565) 192
9.01 0:12 +0.65 2.e4 Sxe4 3.f3 Sd6 4.Sc3 Sc6 5.d5 Se5
6.b3 Sf5 (2.383.678) 196
Bester Zug: e2-e4 Zeit: 0:15.959 min K/s: 196.000 Knoten: 2.770.216
More aggressive playing style
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:56 pm
- Location: Germany
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: More aggressive playing style
Hi Luca,
Well,I have to admit here,aggressive style is a major understatement
Well,I have to admit here,aggressive style is a major understatement
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:32 am
- Location: Amersfoort
Re: More aggressive playing style
2. e4!!Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Hi Luca,
Well,I have to admit here,aggressive style is a major understatement
LOL
-
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:46 pm
- Location: Kelowna
- Full name: Tony Mokonen
Re: More aggressive playing style
Apparently, 2. e4 is known as the Omega Gambit, and if black accepts with 2... Nxe4, the opening is known as the Arafat Gambit.
Strangely enough, the Arena mainbook does NOT consider 2... Nxe4 as the main line to 2. e4. The book gives 2... d5, 2... e5 and 2... d6 a higher probablility than 2... Nxe4 (though the book will never play 2. e4).
Strangely enough, the Arena mainbook does NOT consider 2... Nxe4 as the main line to 2. e4. The book gives 2... d5, 2... e5 and 2... d6 a higher probablility than 2... Nxe4 (though the book will never play 2. e4).
-
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:56 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: More aggressive playing style
Well, I think I got it right now, not looking at the low depths reached of course.
[D]rnbqkb1r/pppppppp/5n2/8/3P4/8/PPP1PPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq -
Engine: ChessMind 0.72 (0 MB)
von metax
6.00 0:01 +0.09 1.Sc3 d5 2.Sf3 Sc6 3.Lg5 e6 4.Lxf6 154
7.01 0:02 +0.04 1.Sc3 d5 2.Sf3 Sc6 3.Lg5 e6 4.Tc1 Ld7 (568.276) 200
7.08 0:04 +0.21 1.Lf4 d5 2.e3 Se4 3.Sf3 Sc6 4.Sbd2 Sxd2 (821.274) 202
8.01 0:06 +0.19 1.Lf4 d6 2.e3 Sd5 3.Sf3 Sc6 4.Le2 Sxf4
5.exf4 (1.278.959) 204
9.01 0:14 +0.20 1.Lf4 d6 2.Sc3 Sc6 3.e4 e5 4.dxe5 Sxe5
5.Lb5+ Sc6 6.Tb1 (3.104.030) 208
10.01 0:27 +0.19 1.Lf4 d6 2.Sc3 Sc6 3.e4 e5 4.dxe5 Lg4
5.Le2 dxe5 6.Lxg4 (5.744.688) 208
Bester Zug: Lc1-f4 Zeit: 1:05.161 min K/s: 209.000 Knoten: 13.230.274
It thought about 2.c4 for a long time at every iteration but didn't switch moves.
[D]rnbqkb1r/pppppppp/5n2/8/3P4/8/PPP1PPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq -
Engine: ChessMind 0.72 (0 MB)
von metax
6.00 0:01 +0.09 1.Sc3 d5 2.Sf3 Sc6 3.Lg5 e6 4.Lxf6 154
7.01 0:02 +0.04 1.Sc3 d5 2.Sf3 Sc6 3.Lg5 e6 4.Tc1 Ld7 (568.276) 200
7.08 0:04 +0.21 1.Lf4 d5 2.e3 Se4 3.Sf3 Sc6 4.Sbd2 Sxd2 (821.274) 202
8.01 0:06 +0.19 1.Lf4 d6 2.e3 Sd5 3.Sf3 Sc6 4.Le2 Sxf4
5.exf4 (1.278.959) 204
9.01 0:14 +0.20 1.Lf4 d6 2.Sc3 Sc6 3.e4 e5 4.dxe5 Sxe5
5.Lb5+ Sc6 6.Tb1 (3.104.030) 208
10.01 0:27 +0.19 1.Lf4 d6 2.Sc3 Sc6 3.e4 e5 4.dxe5 Lg4
5.Le2 dxe5 6.Lxg4 (5.744.688) 208
Bester Zug: Lc1-f4 Zeit: 1:05.161 min K/s: 209.000 Knoten: 13.230.274
It thought about 2.c4 for a long time at every iteration but didn't switch moves.