He's both. Ask MIT.seemychess wrote:vas is not a programmer but a chess im.
Rybka 4Beta is playing!
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Next: Time-BUG!
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Next: Time-BUG!
You tell me? A combination of what everyone else has done before he grabbed it including the work which had been done by Vas and others and tinkering around with it but I don't know how much stronger it really is do you?Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:So how do you think he keeps in improving it TerryTerry McCracken wrote:Do you think it's honest? Do you think Norman is a genius? Would you buy it?Edward German wrote:All in All you are right!Joerg Oster wrote:But why do you care?Edward German wrote: My Conclusion: Only ~ 2 weeks before the release of R4, I see most BUG's in Rybka. Can this be fixed in just two weeks??
I thought you don't like Rybka...
Joerg
My new favorite engine is FIRE(Bird).
Fire understand (Rybka not in bishop) all underpromotions, and Fire have more endgame knowledge than Rybka. This are for me important aspects.
And all in all at last, the strenght of Fire 1.3 will be ~ egual with Rybka 4.
ED.
For sure,me and I suppose you,we can't....so he must have enough knowledge to be able to do it....
Dr.D
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Next: Time-BUG!
Good for you but honestly I'd steal it rather than give a con-artist money.alpha123 wrote:1) Yes.Terry McCracken wrote:1.Do you think it's honest? 2.Do you think Norman is a genius? 3.Would you buy it?Edward German wrote:All in All you are right!Joerg Oster wrote:But why do you care?Edward German wrote: My Conclusion: Only ~ 2 weeks before the release of R4, I see most BUG's in Rybka. Can this be fixed in just two weeks??
I thought you don't like Rybka...
Joerg
My new favorite engine is FIRE(Bird).
Fire understand (Rybka not in bishop) all underpromotions, and Fire have more endgame knowledge than Rybka. This are for me important aspects.
And all in all at last, the strenght of Fire 1.3 will be ~ egual with Rybka 4.
ED.
2) It's a possibility. With all due respect to Norman though, a bit unlikely.
3) Probably.
Peter
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:11 am
Re: Rybka 4Beta Hardware
A strong tactical game by Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 6, indeed.Edward German wrote:If this is real a Rybka 4 Beta, then I cannot see why this Thing should be stronger than Rybka 3!Edward German wrote:Highendmans Hardware (was post in Chat):
Rybka 4Beta1SSE4 slave (8 cores): 17.5 plies; 642kN/s Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W5580 @ 3.20GHz 3200MHz
See here:
[Event "5m + 0s, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2010.05.12"]
[Round "?"]
[White "CrapCleaner, Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 6"]
[Black "Highendman, Rybka 4Beta1SSE4 sla"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2607"]
[BlackElo "2806"]
[PlyCount "129"]
[EventDate "2010.05.12"]
[EventType "blitz"]
1. c4 {0} e6 {B/0 0} 2. d4 {0} Nf6 {B/0 0} 3. Nc3 {0} Bb4 {B/0 0} 4. Nf3 {0} d5
{B/0 0} 5. g3 {0} dxc4 {0.00/16 18} 6. Bg2 {0} Nd5 {0.02/16 15} 7. Qc2 {7} O-O
{-0.04/17 1} 8. e4 {11} Nxc3 {(Nb6) 0.07/17 0} 9. bxc3 {1} Be7 {0.07/17 15} 10.
O-O {0} c5 {(Nd7) 0.03/16 18} 11. Be3 {11} Nd7 {(cxd4) 0.10/16 12} 12. Rfd1 {8}
cxd4 {(b6) 0.00/16 22} 13. cxd4 {12} b5 {0.06/17 0} 14. a4 {13} bxa4 {
-0.01/15 5} 15. Rxa4 {2} Nb6 {0.00/16 5} 16. Ra5 {10} Bb4 {(Bb7) 0.00/16 7} 17.
Rb5 {12} Be7 {0.00/16 0} 18. Ra1 {10} Bb7 {0.00/16 10} 19. Rab1 {0} Re8 {
(Bc6) -0.19/13 14} 20. Ra5 {9} f6 {(Qc7) 0.00/15 35} 21. Nd2 {0.24/19 6} Qc8 {
-0.04/14 0} 22. Qc3 {0.16/20 8} f5 {0.00/15 8} 23. f3 {0.12/20 0} Qd7 {
(Rd8) -0.03/14 25} 24. Rba1 {0.00/20 23} a6 {(Bf6) -0.03/17 0} 25. Rb1 {
0.28/18 7} Bd8 {0.00/16 0} 26. Ra2 {0.28/18 6} Qc6 {(Rc8) 0.00/15 0} 27. Rc2 {
0.28/18 6} Rc8 {0.00/13 4} 28. Qa1 {0.12/18 3} Qd7 {0.00/13 0} 29. Bf1 {
0.00/18 6} fxe4 {-0.19/14 12} 30. fxe4 {0.00/19 1} Bc6 {(a5) -0.22/14 4} 31.
Bh3 {0.00/16 6} Rb8 {(Rf8) -0.39/13 7} 32. Qa3 {0.00/19 5} Bc7 {
(Qb7) -0.21/13 0} 33. Bg4 {0.12/17 4} Qd8 {(Qe7) -0.26/13 5} 34. Qc5 {0.52/18 4
} Ba4 {(Bb5) -0.28/15 9} 35. Rcc1 {0.28/18 12} Bb5 {-0.26/15 0} 36. Qh5 {
0.08/19 7} Qe7 {-0.36/16 0} 37. Ra1 {0.28/19 3} Bd6 {(h6) -0.36/14 2} 38. Nf3 {
0.72/18 6} h6 {-0.22/15 0} 39. Nh4 {0.56/18 5} Bb4 {(Bc6) 0.00/14 5} 40. Rf1 {
0.88/16 6} Nd7 {(c3) 0.00/11 3} 41. Ng6 {2.26/15 3} Qd8 {(Qd6) 0.14/11 3} 42.
Bxh6 {3.39/18 3} Nf6 {-0.74/10 1} 43. Rxf6 {4.24/17 1} Qxd4+ {2.48/10 1} 44.
Be3 {4.20/21 1} Qxe3+ {2.74/11 0} 45. Kh1 {4.56/21 2} Qh6 {4.93/14 0} 46. Ne7+
{4.60/19 2} Rxe7 {5.02/15 0} 47. Rxh6 {4.52/17 0} gxh6 {5.02/15 0} 48. Qg6+ {
4.72/19 1} Kh8 {5.06/16 0} 49. Qxh6+ {4.64/18 2} Rh7 {5.09/16 0} 50. Qf6+ {
4.68/18 2} Rg7 {5.09/16 0} 51. Bxe6 {4.84/19 2} Be7 {(Rf8) 3.20/12 3} 52. Qd4 {
4.96/17 2} Rd8 {3.31/13 2} 53. Bd5 {4.76/19 0} Rf8 {(Bg5) 3.36/13 1} 54. Bxc4 {
5.13/18 2} Rd8 {3.36/14 0} 55. Bd5 {5.17/17 2} Rf8 {3.65/13 0} 56. e5 {
5.33/16 1} Rc8 {(Rd8) 3.65/13 1} 57. Qb6 {5.73/16 2} Bg5 {(Bd3) 4.90/11 4} 58.
h4 {6.18/16 1} Be7 {5.78/10 3} 59. Be4 {6.90/19 0} Rd8 {5.81/9 0} 60. Qh6+ {
7.15/17 1} Kg8 {5.60/11 0} 61. Qe6+ {8.24/20 5} Kf8 {(Kh8) 5.62/9 1} 62. h5 {
11.03/14 2} Rxg3 {(Rf7) 6.94/8 1} 63. h6 {17.89/15 2} Bg5 {(Rg5) 11.06/8 1} 64.
Bd5 {26.18/16 1} Rd7 {12.69/7 0} 65. Qg8+ {
Highendman,Rybka 4Beta1SSE4 sla resigns (Lag: Av=0.23s, max=1.2s) 29.65/13 0}
1-0
WoW, what a tactical strong game by Stockfish!
-
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:48 am
Re: Next: Time-BUG!
I hope I don't cause a maelstrom here but hasn't the author of Firebird been caught distributing cloned engines in the past? Please correct me if I am wrong. That is why I have never downloaded Firebird or any of it's relatives.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:So how do you think he keeps in improving it TerryTerry McCracken wrote:Do you think it's honest? Do you think Norman is a genius? Would you buy it?Edward German wrote:All in All you are right!Joerg Oster wrote:But why do you care?Edward German wrote: My Conclusion: Only ~ 2 weeks before the release of R4, I see most BUG's in Rybka. Can this be fixed in just two weeks??
I thought you don't like Rybka...
Joerg
My new favorite engine is FIRE(Bird).
Fire understand (Rybka not in bishop) all underpromotions, and Fire have more endgame knowledge than Rybka. This are for me important aspects.
And all in all at last, the strenght of Fire 1.3 will be ~ egual with Rybka 4.
ED.
For sure,me and I suppose you,we can't....so he must have enough knowledge to be able to do it....
Dr.D
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
Re: Next: Time-BUG!
Technically, he created engines that violated the GPL. One of them he even sold. But if Norm says that he won't do that stuff anymore, I'll give him another chance.tomgdrums wrote:I hope I don't cause a maelstrom here but hasn't the author of Firebird been caught distributing cloned engines in the past? Please correct me if I am wrong. That is why I have never downloaded Firebird or any of it's relatives.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:So how do you think he keeps in improving it TerryTerry McCracken wrote:Do you think it's honest? Do you think Norman is a genius? Would you buy it?Edward German wrote:All in All you are right!Joerg Oster wrote:But why do you care?Edward German wrote: My Conclusion: Only ~ 2 weeks before the release of R4, I see most BUG's in Rybka. Can this be fixed in just two weeks??
I thought you don't like Rybka...
Joerg
My new favorite engine is FIRE(Bird).
Fire understand (Rybka not in bishop) all underpromotions, and Fire have more endgame knowledge than Rybka. This are for me important aspects.
And all in all at last, the strenght of Fire 1.3 will be ~ egual with Rybka 4.
ED.
For sure,me and I suppose you,we can't....so he must have enough knowledge to be able to do it....
Dr.D
BTW, Fire's relatives are not affiliated with Norman in any way, shape, or form. Well, I suppose he did contribute a bit to the RobboLito codebase.
Peter