Another interesting post on Openchess
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:06 am
-
- Posts: 6073
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Another interesting post on Openchess
Why is that interesting? It is just copy/paste of other posts with mouth almighty on the end.Robert Flesher wrote:http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=297
-
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:37 pm
Re: Another interesting post on Openchess
Hi,
Do youmean this:
http://www.playwitharena.com
Do youmean this:
MichaelThe communist computer chess poll:
Do you belive the rights on an engine belongs to the author ?
no 100 % (The party is always right this is why our party chief always gets 100 % of the votes if not more)
yes 0 % (we will send all Menscheviks who dared to vote yes to ... while we still offer illegal Mephisto ROMs on our page)
abstenation 0% we all have the same opinion everything that belongs to others belonfs to us (this is not true for the party members of course)
http://www.playwitharena.com
-
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:06 am
Re: Another interesting post on Openchess
Christopher Conkie wrote:Why is that interesting? It is just copy/paste of other posts with mouth almighty on the end.Robert Flesher wrote:http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=297
I didn't say factual , I said interesting. However, if the comparision between Fruit and Stelka is honest and accurate. Then why would Vas years ago have claimed Stelka was a direct copy of Rybka and claimed it as his own? You see the implications here ?
-
- Posts: 6073
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Another interesting post on Openchess
It is old hat Robert. Strelka was built on a fruit base by Osipov. He then inserted parts of disassembled Rybka in it. You could ask him yourself and he would probably even tell you why he did it. AFAIK it was to discover how it worked (at least that is what he said back then)Robert Flesher wrote:Christopher Conkie wrote:Why is that interesting? It is just copy/paste of other posts with mouth almighty on the end.Robert Flesher wrote:http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=297
I didn't say factual , I said interesting. However, if the comparision between Fruit and Stelka is honest and accurate. Then why would Vas years ago have claimed Stelka was a direct copy of Rybka and claimed it as his own? You see the implications here ?
What is slightly interesting is the novel way used to create content in that forum by copying content from other fora......
What happens next after that is it is used as a shout box for Mr Lenin and his concubine.
It is slightly interesting on that level, but ultimately extremely childish and shows a very bored old man, with nothing better to do except beat his hollow insignificant drum.
Chris
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Another interesting post on Openchess
Seams that years under Ceausescu have really taken its toll on you...Michael Diosi wrote:Hi,
Do youmean this:
The communist computer chess poll:
Do you belive the rights on an engine belongs to the author ?
no 100 % (The party is always right this is why our party chief always gets 100 % of the votes if not more)
yes 0 % (we will send all Menscheviks who dared to vote yes to ... while we still offer illegal Mephisto ROMs on our page)
abstenation 0% we all have the same opinion everything that belongs to others belonfs to us (this is not true for the party members of course)
-
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:37 pm
Re: Another interesting post on Openchess
Hi,
<you should know it by now>
I was sure you wouldn't get it. You see chess is on other level than Tic Tac Toe. Just too many plies ahead for you.
Thanks once again for confirming the name of your engine...
Michael
http://www.playwitharena.com
<you should know it by now>
I was sure you wouldn't get it. You see chess is on other level than Tic Tac Toe. Just too many plies ahead for you.
Thanks once again for confirming the name of your engine...
Michael
http://www.playwitharena.com
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Another interesting post on Openchess
I admire your originality .Michael Diosi wrote:Hi,
<you should know it by now>
I was sure you wouldn't get it. You see chess is on other level than Tic Tac Toe. Just too many plies ahead for you.
Thanks once again for confirming the name of your engine...