Smooth scaling stockfish 1.9 (using the old formula)

[Dann Corbit]

This one has the same formula as stockfish 1.6s. I think I changed to many things at once and did not do enough testing on the new formula attempt. At any rate, I guess that this one will do a lot better.

http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -gtb-ss.7z

Couldn't hurt to test it some.

[mcostalba]

This one has the same formula as stockfish 1.6s. I think I changed to many things at once and did not do enough testing on the new formula attempt. At any rate, I guess that this one will do a lot better.

http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -gtb-ss.7z

Couldn't hurt to test it some.

Dann. Sources you posted are _exactly_ 1.9.1 sources.

I don't care a lot this gtb / ss modification activity on sf 1.9.1, but please DO STICK to GPL and post modified sources together with binaries.

I am sure you understand to defend GPL is already difficult as is, so please don't make it worse then what already is.

[Dann Corbit]

This one has the same formula as stockfish 1.6s. I think I changed to many things at once and did not do enough testing on the new formula attempt. At any rate, I guess that this one will do a lot better.

http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -gtb-ss.7z

Couldn't hurt to test it some.

Dann. Sources you posted are _exactly_ 1.9.1 sources.

I don't care a lot this gtb / ss modification activity on sf 1.9.1, but please DO STICK to GPL and post modified sources together with binaries.

I am sure you understand to defend GPL is already difficult as is, so please don't make it worse then what already is.

The sources are contained in that archive

[mcostalba]

This one has the same formula as stockfish 1.6s. I think I changed to many things at once and did not do enough testing on the new formula attempt. At any rate, I guess that this one will do a lot better.

http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -gtb-ss.7z

Couldn't hurt to test it some.

Dann. Sources you posted are _exactly_ 1.9.1 sources.

I don't care a lot this gtb / ss modification activity on sf 1.9.1, but please DO STICK to GPL and post modified sources together with binaries.

I am sure you understand to defend GPL is already difficult as is, so please don't make it worse then what already is.

The sources are contained in that archive

I opened the archive and extract the sources and they seem _exactly_ 1.9.1, I could have done some mistake, but the sources in the archive to me seems the vanilla 1.9.1

[Dann Corbit]

This one has the same formula as stockfish 1.6s. I think I changed to many things at once and did not do enough testing on the new formula attempt. At any rate, I guess that this one will do a lot better.

http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -gtb-ss.7z

Couldn't hurt to test it some.

Dann. Sources you posted are _exactly_ 1.9.1 sources.

I don't care a lot this gtb / ss modification activity on sf 1.9.1, but please DO STICK to GPL and post modified sources together with binaries.

I am sure you understand to defend GPL is already difficult as is, so please don't make it worse then what already is.

The sources are contained in that archive

I opened the archive and extract the sources and they seem _exactly_ 1.9.1, I could have done some mistake, but the sources in the archive to me seems the vanilla 1.9.1

Probably, I composed the archive incorrectly and pulled the original sources instead. I will take a look.

[Dann Corbit]

This one has the same formula as stockfish 1.6s. I think I changed to many things at once and did not do enough testing on the new formula attempt. At any rate, I guess that this one will do a lot better.

http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -gtb-ss.7z

Couldn't hurt to test it some.

Dann. Sources you posted are _exactly_ 1.9.1 sources.

I don't care a lot this gtb / ss modification activity on sf 1.9.1, but please DO STICK to GPL and post modified sources together with binaries.

I am sure you understand to defend GPL is already difficult as is, so please don't make it worse then what already is.

The sources are contained in that archive

I opened the archive and extract the sources and they seem _exactly_ 1.9.1, I could have done some mistake, but the sources in the archive to me seems the vanilla 1.9.1

Probably, I composed the archive incorrectly and pulled the original sources instead. I will take a look.

This one:
http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -19-gtb.7z

[Dann Corbit]

This one has the same formula as stockfish 1.6s. I think I changed to many things at once and did not do enough testing on the new formula attempt. At any rate, I guess that this one will do a lot better.

http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -gtb-ss.7z

Couldn't hurt to test it some.

Dann. Sources you posted are _exactly_ 1.9.1 sources.

I don't care a lot this gtb / ss modification activity on sf 1.9.1, but please DO STICK to GPL and post modified sources together with binaries.

I am sure you understand to defend GPL is already difficult as is, so please don't make it worse then what already is.

The sources are contained in that archive

I opened the archive and extract the sources and they seem _exactly_ 1.9.1, I could have done some mistake, but the sources in the archive to me seems the vanilla 1.9.1

Probably, I composed the archive incorrectly and pulled the original sources instead. I will take a look.

This one:
http://cap.connx.com/chess-engines/new- ... -19-gtb.7z

I made a correction to search.cpp. File has same name and location

[UncombedCoconut]

Dann. Sources you posted are _exactly_ 1.9.1 sources.

I don't care a lot this gtb / ss modification activity on sf 1.9.1, but please DO STICK to GPL and post modified sources together with binaries.

I am sure you understand to defend GPL is already difficult as is, so please don't make it worse then what already is.

Wow. That was obviously an honest mistake; perhaps a response such as the following would have been more appropriate:
Dann, the sources in your archive do not contain your change. Would you please fix this mistake?

[michiguel]

Dann. Sources you posted are _exactly_ 1.9.1 sources.

I don't care a lot this gtb / ss modification activity on sf 1.9.1, but please DO STICK to GPL and post modified sources together with binaries.

I am sure you understand to defend GPL is already difficult as is, so please don't make it worse then what already is.

Wow. That was obviously an honest mistake; perhaps a response such as the following would have been more appropriate:
Dann, the sources in your archive do not contain your change. Would you please fix this mistake?

Justin, it looks like you have never seen a real picture of Dann



Miguel

[UncombedCoconut]

I am sorry for my grumpiness. Miguel, thank you for dissolving it.