Should TCEC switch to Ponder = ON ?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:07 am
Re: Should TCEC switch to Ponder = ON ?
If someone hasn't voted yet please do so now, it's not too long until the poll expires.
-
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:07 am
Re: Should TCEC switch to Ponder = ON ?
The decision had to be taken even though there's a couple more hours left of the poll.
Ponder will stay OFF.
Thanks for voting everyone. Division III has started so I invite
everyone to watch the broadcast, either on my page or over at
chessbomb, or even better: both places.
Ponder will stay OFF.
Thanks for voting everyone. Division III has started so I invite
everyone to watch the broadcast, either on my page or over at
chessbomb, or even better: both places.
-
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:01 pm
Re: Should TCEC switch to Ponder = ON ?
Sorry Dan, but I must disagree with this statement.Dann Corbit wrote:Half the time with twice the cores = twice the time with half the cores.
There are significant parallel search efficiency issues.
Moreover, there are time control issues.
So, what is better, but still not exactly equal (due to hashing and other non-deterministic factors) is:
one core with twice the speed about equal to another single core at half the speed for twice the time.
That said, of course I typically test Tinker without pondering to get the most games (and no, Tinker is still not a parallel searcher).
For "proper" tournaments I think pondering should be on, just IMO.
In any case, pondering is nothing compared to the much thornier book issue.
-
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:14 am
Re: Should TCEC switch to Ponder = ON ?
ponder on would be interesting, but i'm fine either way...and if its not broke, don't fix it.
thank you once again martin for this undertaking. don't know what your PC situation is but its fantastic youre dedicating so much time, h/w & electricity simply for the enjoyment of others. even though it may seem small in comparison, i've truly become appreciative of the work of guys like you, richard vida, & miguel balliorca, as well as of course the stockfish team. very cool to see such genuine generosity & community.
thank you once again martin for this undertaking. don't know what your PC situation is but its fantastic youre dedicating so much time, h/w & electricity simply for the enjoyment of others. even though it may seem small in comparison, i've truly become appreciative of the work of guys like you, richard vida, & miguel balliorca, as well as of course the stockfish team. very cool to see such genuine generosity & community.
-
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:07 am
Re: Should TCEC switch to Ponder = ON ?
John,yanquis1972 wrote:ponder on would be interesting, but i'm fine either way...and if its not broke, don't fix it.
thank you once again martin for this undertaking. don't know what your PC situation is but its fantastic youre dedicating so much time, h/w & electricity simply for the enjoyment of others. even though it may seem small in comparison, i've truly become appreciative of the work of guys like you, richard vida, & miguel balliorca, as well as of course the stockfish team. very cool to see such genuine generosity & community.
Thank you so much for your encouragement! Comments like this are exactly what inspires me to continue.
Now that I feel TCEC is where it should be we should all be able to enjoy some fine computer chess in the future.
Thanks again.
-Martin