I prefer to call it "non-naive"...tomgdrums wrote: Your reasoning is morally incompetent at best.
Fabien's open letter to the community
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 27811
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
-
- Posts: 2949
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 12:16 pm
- Location: Bordeaux (France)
- Full name: Julien Marcel
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
Congratulations to the both of you : just by try and fail method you gave an acceptable definition of cynicism.hgm wrote:I prefer to call it "non-naive"...tomgdrums wrote: Your reasoning is morally incompetent at best.
"The only good bug is a dead bug." (Don Dailey)
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
-
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
Hi Fabien,
it was one of the best interviews I ever made. Without my girlfiend not possible, helps me with my bad English. The answers from the Stockfish team are just great. I am very lucky in this time that Tord, Joona and Marco made it with me and gave so many nice information.
Yes, I can send a mail what I read between the lines in our interview
But I don't have your mail address!
If you have time for it:
Please write me:
www.amateurschach.de ... click on impressum ... contact form.
THANKS!
Best for you whatever you do!
Frank
it was one of the best interviews I ever made. Without my girlfiend not possible, helps me with my bad English. The answers from the Stockfish team are just great. I am very lucky in this time that Tord, Joona and Marco made it with me and gave so many nice information.
Yes, I can send a mail what I read between the lines in our interview
But I don't have your mail address!
If you have time for it:
Please write me:
www.amateurschach.de ... click on impressum ... contact form.
THANKS!
Best for you whatever you do!
Frank
Last edited by Frank Quisinsky on Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:40 am
- Location: Italy
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
A real hornet's nest! Here's the truth comes out ...
Where are all those trombones, who see clones everywhere?
...Caught with his fingers in the jam!
Where are all those trombones, who see clones everywhere?
...Caught with his fingers in the jam!
-
- Posts: 6401
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:30 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
Gabor asked for something new.Laskos wrote:1. Strelka 1.8 gives almost identical output to Rybka 1.0. You can see that on my similarity graph posted in this thread, and Uri's examples.SzG wrote:I am lost in this avalanche of post so I must ask someone to enlighten me: if all Fabien saw was his own code and the Strelka code, how is he to know what was the way Rybka was made? He has only the same two source codes at his disposal which have been there for studying for more than 3 years.
So what is new here that makes some posters think Rybka is illegal?
2. Vasik personally claimed Strelka 2.0 sources as his own. Funny.
Now, if Strelka is Fruit 2.1 derivative, as Fabien implies, then...
Kai
Miguel
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
Common sense....the crook must cover his crime signs....slobo wrote:The newest one is that Rybka´s codes suddenly became lost ( or deleted), and cannot be examined by experts anymore.SzG wrote:I told you I was confused.slobo wrote:You are confused. Mr Rybka and Fabien are disputing Strelka´s code.SzG wrote:I am lost in this avalanche of post so I must ask someone to enlighten me: if all Fabien saw was his own code and the Strelka code, how is he to know what was the way Rybka was made? He has only the same two source codes at his disposal which have been there for studying for more than 3 years.
So what is new here that makes some posters think Rybka is illegal?
I repeat: what new is there as an evidence for many posters here that Rybka is a stolen work.
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 2331
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:36 pm
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
Well, you are allowed to call it as you like but, it seems, you know the truth.hgm wrote:I prefer to call it "non-naive"...tomgdrums wrote: Your reasoning is morally incompetent at best.
"Well, I´m just a soul whose intentions are good,
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 pm
- Full name: Kai Laskos
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
The problem disputed wasSzG wrote:It seems to me these have been known facts for years. I am sure of the first two, and the 3rd one has been discussed not very long ago also with the conclusion that it is true. Or?Laskos wrote:1. Strelka 1.8 gives almost identical output to Rybka 1.0. You can see that on my similarity graph posted in this thread, and Uri's examples.SzG wrote:I am lost in this avalanche of post so I must ask someone to enlighten me: if all Fabien saw was his own code and the Strelka code, how is he to know what was the way Rybka was made? He has only the same two source codes at his disposal which have been there for studying for more than 3 years.
So what is new here that makes some posters think Rybka is illegal?
2. Vasik personally claimed Strelka 2.0 sources as his own. Funny.
Now, if Strelka is Fruit 2.1 derivative, as Fabien implies, then...
Kai
3. Therefore Rybka 1.0 is a Fruit 2.1 derivative
Maybe I am missing something out of your confusion, but after Fabien statements about Strelka...
Kai
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
Damn,this thread is taking over mine related to the match against Excalibur Ivan II in terms of popularity
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 2949
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 12:16 pm
- Location: Bordeaux (France)
- Full name: Julien Marcel
Re: Fabien's open letter to the community
If I'm not mistaken, the absolute record in terms of posts is the thread entitled "BB+ on the matter", with 253 posts, and the most poplar one in term of view count is the one entitled "On Robots", with 69043 views.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Damn,this thread is taking over mine related to the match against Excalibur Ivan II in terms of popularity
Records are made to be broken.
"The only good bug is a dead bug." (Don Dailey)
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]