Not true. In every democracy at least, you are free to discuss everything including regular court decisions. - I'd even say controversial decisions must be discussed (at least!).JuLieN wrote:In most countries, it is forbidden to discuss a tribunal decision (or each country would soon become a pile of rubbers too).
ICGA is probably just a private club (and I don't know what it's legal status is, if any at all). But that probably makes the anti Rybka verdict even worse: Because if a regular court gives a judgement, there are legal means (remedy) available, there is a sequence of courts to appeal and so on, in democratic systems.
Anyway, looking at the absurd size of the related discussions, and the absence of any constructive results from it, I have the impression that this matter is totally overvalued in the scene, at least as it appears to be on the message boards.