Perft(13) [3.4 GHz Core i7-2600, 16 GB RAM]

Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Ajedrecista
Posts: 1969
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain.

'MonteCarlo Perft' vs. 'exact Perft'.

Post by Ajedrecista »

Hello:
sje wrote:After 20 weeks, the run has produced 331,403 draft 8 records, about 40% of the total needed.

Mean time per draft 8 record: ca. 36 seconds

Most recent output:

Code: Select all

rnbqk1nr/ppppbppp/8/4p3/8/3P3N/PPPBPPPP/RN1QKB1R b KQkq - 2 3 8 439081704189
rnbqkbnr/pppp1p1p/6p1/4p3/P5P1/3P4/1PP1PP1P/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3 8 651089951521
rnbqkbnr/pppp1pp1/7p/4p3/5P2/2N1P3/PPPP2PP/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3 8 1022847249810
r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/n7/4p3/8/N2BP3/PPPP1PPP/R1BQK1NR b KQkq - 2 3 8 978461221829
rnbqkbnr/pppp1p1p/8/4p1p1/1P6/3P4/P1PQPPPP/RNB1KBNR b KQkq - 1 3 8 452030463425
rnbqkbnr/pppp1p1p/6p1/4p3/P7/3P3P/1PP1PPP1/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3 8 546602581638
r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/2n5/4p3/8/3P1N2/PPPQPPPP/RNB1KB1R b KQkq - 2 3 8 1169896133141
rnbqk1nr/ppppbppp/8/4p3/8/3PB2N/PPP1PPPP/RN1QKB1R b KQkq - 2 3 8 500525923972
rnbqkbnr/pppp2pp/5p2/4p3/3P4/P7/1PPQPPPP/RNB1KBNR b KQkq - 1 3 8 572130843907
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/8/3p2P1/1P6/P1P1PP1P/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3 8 793609133355
(Sorry for the long output of this post).

It seems that Perft(13) count goes in the correct path. This is good!

I want to congratulate Peter Österlund for sharing his MonteCarlo Perft method, which is great. I also congratulate the rest of people that contributed to estimate Perft(13) with their methods. Simply thanks to all of you.

I tried MonteCarlo Perft implemented in GNU 5.07.173b (32 bits) for the first time in this week. Astonishing is what it comes to my mind. I was unable of set a different position from the initial one, but finally I managed it. I have taken this FEN string:

Code: Select all

rnbqk1nr/ppppbppp/8/4p3/8/3P3N/PPPBPPPP/RN1QKB1R b KQkq - 2 3
Which is the first FEN string of last Steven's output (I quote it at the top of my post). And here are the results I got (I stopped around 1e+8 visited nodes):
Initializing 32 bit magics...
Transposition table: Entries=2048K Size=49152K
Pawn hash table: Entries=1K Size=32K
No 3-pc GTBs available
No 4-pc GTBs available
No 5-pc GTBs available
GNU Chess 5.07.173b-libgtb-32
pgnload a.pgn
HashKey=463b96181691fc9c
Repeat=0
FEN=rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
white KQkq
r n b q k b n r
p p p p p p p p
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
P P P P P P P P
R N B Q K B N R

stack[0]=0000000000000000
stack[1]=0000000000000000
HashKey=3468ae52d10b0731
Repeat=0
FEN=rnbqk1nr/ppppbppp/8/4p3/8/3P3N/PPPBPPPP/RN1QKB1R b KQkq - 2 3
black KQkq
r n b q k . n r
p p p p b p p p
. . . . . . . .
. . . . p . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . P . . . N
P P P B P P P P
R N . Q K B . R

perftmc 8
m=4.389710e+011 sd=1.078699e+008 ci(99%)=[4.386932e+011,4.392489e+011] n=4893760
sdn=2.386281e+011 t=77.69s
m=4.389946e+011 sd=6.658383e+007 ci(99%)=[4.388231e+011,4.391661e+011] n=7340646
sdn=1.803997e+011 t=116.98s
m=4.390173e+011 sd=5.226561e+007 ci(99%)=[4.388826e+011,4.391519e+011] n=9787534
sdn=1.635131e+011 t=155.89s
m=4.390215e+011 sd=4.070511e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389167e+011,4.391264e+011] n=1223442
3 sdn=1.423773e+011 t=194.41s
m=4.390096e+011 sd=3.532241e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389186e+011,4.391005e+011] n=1468129
6 sdn=1.353420e+011 t=233.97s
m=4.390432e+011 sd=4.501471e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389273e+011,4.391592e+011] n=1712818
3 sdn=1.862988e+011 t=272.39s
m=4.390167e+011 sd=4.717747e+007 ci(99%)=[4.388951e+011,4.391382e+011] n=1957507
3 sdn=2.087307e+011 t=312.83s
m=4.390330e+011 sd=4.468849e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389179e+011,4.391481e+011] n=2202195
5 sdn=2.097122e+011 t=352.25s
m=4.390487e+011 sd=4.296597e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389381e+011,4.391594e+011] n=2446884
4 sdn=2.125355e+011 t=391.72s
m=4.390583e+011 sd=4.001693e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389552e+011,4.391614e+011] n=2691572
4 sdn=2.076093e+011 t=431.34s
m=4.390313e+011 sd=4.541986e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389143e+011,4.391483e+011] n=2936260
7 sdn=2.461178e+011 t=471.81s
m=4.390340e+011 sd=4.187134e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389262e+011,4.391419e+011] n=3180948
9 sdn=2.361539e+011 t=512.53s
m=4.390480e+011 sd=4.120716e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389419e+011,4.391542e+011] n=3425638
2 sdn=2.411812e+011 t=553.92s
m=4.390584e+011 sd=3.973539e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389560e+011,4.391607e+011] n=3670326
9 sdn=2.407298e+011 t=596.31s
m=4.390668e+011 sd=3.810917e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389686e+011,4.391650e+011] n=3915016
2 sdn=2.384494e+011 t=635.22s
m=4.390737e+011 sd=3.646673e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389798e+011,4.391677e+011] n=4159704
7 sdn=2.351950e+011 t=674.45s
m=4.390743e+011 sd=3.438621e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389858e+011,4.391629e+011] n=4404393
0 sdn=2.282062e+011 t=714.12s
m=4.390767e+011 sd=3.261246e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389927e+011,4.391607e+011] n=4649082
5 sdn=2.223654e+011 t=755.78s
m=4.390698e+011 sd=3.169603e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389882e+011,4.391515e+011] n=4893771
8 sdn=2.217311e+011 t=796.73s
m=4.390618e+011 sd=3.119453e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389815e+011,4.391422e+011] n=5138459
1 sdn=2.236119e+011 t=839.06s
m=4.390549e+011 sd=3.053740e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389762e+011,4.391336e+011] n=5383147
7 sdn=2.240527e+011 t=884.25s
m=4.390623e+011 sd=3.010657e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389848e+011,4.391399e+011] n=5627836
4 sdn=2.258562e+011 t=929.92s
m=4.390702e+011 sd=2.987933e+007 ci(99%)=[4.389932e+011,4.391471e+011] n=5872525
2 sdn=2.289725e+011 t=985.53s
m=4.390784e+011 sd=2.982856e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390016e+011,4.391553e+011] n=6117214
5 sdn=2.332970e+011 t=1036.59s
m=4.390751e+011 sd=2.885688e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390007e+011,4.391494e+011] n=6361903
0 sdn=2.301669e+011 t=1081.48s
m=4.390816e+011 sd=2.851979e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390081e+011,4.391550e+011] n=6606592
5 sdn=2.318116e+011 t=1129.05s
m=4.390823e+011 sd=2.749272e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390115e+011,4.391531e+011] n=6851281
6 sdn=2.275640e+011 t=1176.25s
m=4.390867e+011 sd=2.688900e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390175e+011,4.391560e+011] n=7095971
1 sdn=2.265064e+011 t=1226.47s
m=4.390943e+011 sd=2.707311e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390246e+011,4.391641e+011] n=7340659
3 sdn=2.319561e+011 t=1276.88s
m=4.390981e+011 sd=2.645318e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390300e+011,4.391662e+011] n=7585348
4 sdn=2.303910e+011 t=1324.91s
m=4.390931e+011 sd=2.608782e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390259e+011,4.391603e+011] n=7830036
7 sdn=2.308446e+011 t=1372.58s
m=4.390954e+011 sd=2.538700e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390300e+011,4.391608e+011] n=8074725
9 sdn=2.281262e+011 t=1420.95s
m=4.390930e+011 sd=2.474380e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390293e+011,4.391568e+011] n=8319413
7 sdn=2.256903e+011 t=1468.47s
m=4.390862e+011 sd=2.497834e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390219e+011,4.391506e+011] n=8564102
6 sdn=2.311557e+011 t=1514.84s
m=4.390902e+011 sd=2.459824e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390268e+011,4.391536e+011] n=8808791
9 sdn=2.308672e+011 t=1561.69s
m=4.390899e+011 sd=2.392634e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390282e+011,4.391515e+011] n=9053481
6 sdn=2.276586e+011 t=1609.00s
m=4.390875e+011 sd=2.340861e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390272e+011,4.391478e+011] n=9298170
7 sdn=2.257222e+011 t=1656.38s
m=4.390864e+011 sd=2.282579e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390276e+011,4.391452e+011] n=9542858
1 sdn=2.229795e+011 t=1704.16s
m=4.390819e+011 sd=2.269434e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390235e+011,4.391404e+011] n=9787546
6 sdn=2.245198e+011 t=1752.09s
m=4.390696e+011 sd=2.532705e+007 ci(99%)=[4.390044e+011,4.391349e+011] n=1003223
57 sdn=2.536784e+011 t=1799.97s
.
Interrupted!
Comparing with the exact value:
rnbqk1nr/ppppbppp/8/4p3/8/3P3N/PPPBPPPP/RN1QKB1R b KQkq - 2 3 8 439081704189
So, relative errors are (much) less than 0.005% (with n enough big)!

Here is the divided Perft(8):

Code: Select all

rnbqk1nr/ppppbppp/8/4p3/8/3P3N/PPPBPPPP/RN1QKB1R b KQkq - 2 3

  1  be7-d6  16089335029
  2  be7-c5  22051013162
  3  be7-b4  11918256230
  4  be7-a3  17524928284
  5  be7-f6   9878193292
  6  be7-g5  14815955797
  7  be7-h4  13466113493
  8  be7-f8  17811005320
  9  nb8-a6  14380211483
 10  nb8-c6  16328060698
 11  ng8-f6  16891252438
 12  ng8-h6  16963733936
 13   e5-e4  15476308128
 14   a7-a6  13269413108
 15   a7-a5  16512141675
 16   b7-b6  15987455163
 17   b7-b5  16163782384
 18   c7-c6  16274011134
 19   c7-c5  14546867320
 20   d7-d6  19986838498
 21   d7-d5  29694101608
 22   f7-f6  10265632906
 23   f7-f5  14586454464
 24   g7-g6  13331013126
 25   g7-g5  10660622715
 26   h7-h6  13544906144
 27   h7-h5  16714671396
 28  ke8-f8  13949425258

Total:      439081704189

439,081,704,189 (move pathes after 8 half moves).

Time: 907.278 s (0:15:07.278).
It was ran with JetChess 1.0.0.0 in an Intel Pentium D930 (3 GHz) using 1 GB of hash. Obviously, the results are the same, as expected.

Going a little off-topic: I used my Perft estimate 'method' (if it can be named method) again, now for estimate Perft(14) of the initial position of standard chess. I estimated it in August with a Casio calculator, lots of roundings and unknown Perft(13) value on that date [with my 'method' I need Perft(n-1) for estimate Perft(n)]. The result was 6.1861e+19 more less. I have used now the Windows calculator (which means almost no roundings), Perft(13) known value (hoping that the number calculated by Paul Byrne is correct) and this time I adjusted my polynomials with Lagrange interpolation. Here is what I got:
61,885,936,850,878,128,969 < [own Perft(14) estimate] < 61,886,982,793,352,460,506
Which gives an average result of ~ 61,886,459,822,115,294,738 (slightly different from 6.1861e+19) with an interval width of ~ 0,00084505% (a very tiny interval). In fact, when ply grows, my interval widths become more and more tiny (this is a feature of my 'method'). I do not use standard variations, so please do not get confused: I estimate Perft values with two different parameters (I call them alpha and beta... I know, too original names...) and this couple of estimates are the lower bound and the upper bound of my interval. Other thing I have observed is that relative errors are greater with odd plies than with even ones, so if I had a relative error of ~ 0.03022% in my Perft(13) estimate, I expect now less than 0.03% of relative error in Perft(14) because I do not think that this pattern will change.

Yesterday (two days later of my Perft(14) estimate) I ran an extremely long MonteCarlo Perft(14) of the initial position of standard chess. Here is part of the output:
Initializing 32 bit magics...
Transposition table: Entries=2048K Size=49152K
Pawn hash table: Entries=1K Size=32K
No 3-pc GTBs available
No 4-pc GTBs available
No 5-pc GTBs available
GNU Chess 5.07.173b-libgtb-32
perftmc 14
HashKey=463b96181691fc9c
Repeat=0
FEN=rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
white KQkq
r n b q k b n r
p p p p p p p p
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
P P P P P P P P
R N B Q K B N R

m=6.206239e+019 sd=1.708984e+017 ci(99%)=[6.162215e+019,6.250262e+019] n=3962585
sdn=3.401946e+020 t=34.19s
m=6.205078e+019 sd=9.934920e+016 ci(99%)=[6.179485e+019,6.230670e+019] n=5943900
sdn=2.422145e+020 t=51.16s
m=6.199594e+019 sd=8.911690e+016 ci(99%)=[6.176638e+019,6.222551e+019] n=7925206
sdn=2.508796e+020 t=68.06s
m=6.192672e+019 sd=9.776091e+016 ci(99%)=[6.167489e+019,6.217855e+019] n=9906578
sdn=3.076997e+020 t=84.95s
m=6.192906e+019 sd=7.985566e+016 ci(99%)=[6.172335e+019,6.213476e+019] n=1188789
1 sdn=2.753329e+020 t=102.25s
m=6.191169e+019 sd=6.968757e+016 ci(99%)=[6.173218e+019,6.209121e+019] n=1386926
8 sdn=2.595267e+020 t=119.11s
m=6.190071e+019 sd=6.134221e+016 ci(99%)=[6.174269e+019,6.205873e+019] n=1585058
2 sdn=2.442204e+020 t=135.97s
m=6.191212e+019 sd=5.528864e+016 ci(99%)=[6.176970e+019,6.205454e+019] n=1783199
9 sdn=2.334726e+020 t=153.09s
m=6.192867e+019 sd=5.214776e+016 ci(99%)=[6.179434e+019,6.206300e+019] n=1981335
7 sdn=2.321212e+020 t=170.00s
m=6.192521e+019 sd=4.729640e+016 ci(99%)=[6.180337e+019,6.204704e+019] n=2179453
7 sdn=2.208015e+020 t=186.86s
m=6.193613e+019 sd=4.453665e+016 ci(99%)=[6.182141e+019,6.205086e+019] n=2377587
3 sdn=2.171630e+020 t=203.72s
m=6.192204e+019 sd=4.332477e+016 ci(99%)=[6.181043e+019,6.203364e+019] n=2575724
6 sdn=2.198801e+020 t=220.88s
m=6.192854e+019 sd=4.063399e+016 ci(99%)=[6.182386e+019,6.203321e+019] n=2773864
0 sdn=2.140090e+020 t=237.73s
m=6.193283e+019 sd=3.807091e+016 ci(99%)=[6.183476e+019,6.203090e+019] n=2971980
7 sdn=2.075469e+020 t=254.59s
m=6.191550e+019 sd=3.960678e+016 ci(99%)=[6.181347e+019,6.201752e+019] n=3170121
9 sdn=2.230014e+020 t=271.50s
m=6.191004e+019 sd=3.760148e+016 ci(99%)=[6.181318e+019,6.200691e+019] n=3368260
8 sdn=2.182267e+020 t=288.64s



More data...



m=6.188486e+019 sd=5.283857e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187125e+019,6.189847e+019] n=1943696
535 sdn=2.329514e+020 t=36001.81s
m=6.188466e+019 sd=5.282208e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187106e+019,6.189827e+019] n=1945677
767 sdn=2.329973e+020 t=36049.72s
m=6.188448e+019 sd=5.279884e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187088e+019,6.189808e+019] n=1947659
139 sdn=2.330134e+020 t=36097.50s
m=6.188433e+019 sd=5.276738e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187074e+019,6.189792e+019] n=1949640
508 sdn=2.329929e+020 t=36145.14s
m=6.188440e+019 sd=5.271808e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187082e+019,6.189798e+019] n=1951621
930 sdn=2.328935e+020 t=36192.20s
m=6.188443e+019 sd=5.266540e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187086e+019,6.189799e+019] n=1953603
296 sdn=2.327789e+020 t=36239.84s
m=6.188422e+019 sd=5.265392e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187065e+019,6.189778e+019] n=1955584
659 sdn=2.328461e+020 t=36287.47s
m=6.188451e+019 sd=5.268238e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187094e+019,6.189808e+019] n=1957566
047 sdn=2.330900e+020 t=36335.20s
m=6.188469e+019 sd=5.266156e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187113e+019,6.189826e+019] n=1959547
313 sdn=2.331158e+020 t=36382.42s
m=6.188450e+019 sd=5.264600e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187093e+019,6.189806e+019] n=1961528
680 sdn=2.331647e+020 t=36429.84s
m=6.188437e+019 sd=5.260787e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187082e+019,6.189792e+019] n=1963509
906 sdn=2.331134e+020 t=36477.47s
m=6.188445e+019 sd=5.256033e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187091e+019,6.189799e+019] n=1965491
139 sdn=2.330202e+020 t=36525.09s
m=6.188448e+019 sd=5.250844e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187095e+019,6.189801e+019] n=1967472
424 sdn=2.329075e+020 t=36572.44s
m=6.188433e+019 sd=5.247709e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187081e+019,6.189785e+019] n=1969453
750 sdn=2.328856e+020 t=36619.84s
m=6.188431e+019 sd=5.242481e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187080e+019,6.189781e+019] n=1971435
144 sdn=2.327706e+020 t=36667.45s
m=6.188435e+019 sd=5.237390e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187086e+019,6.189784e+019] n=1973416
444 sdn=2.326614e+020 t=36715.06s
m=6.188442e+019 sd=5.232614e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187094e+019,6.189790e+019] n=1975397
869 sdn=2.325659e+020 t=36762.53s
m=6.188433e+019 sd=5.228217e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187086e+019,6.189779e+019] n=1977379
177 sdn=2.324870e+020 t=36809.70s
m=6.188450e+019 sd=5.225728e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187103e+019,6.189796e+019] n=1979360
507 sdn=2.324927e+020 t=36857.38s
m=6.188461e+019 sd=5.221738e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187116e+019,6.189806e+019] n=1981341
842 sdn=2.324314e+020 t=36905.20s
m=6.188464e+019 sd=5.216629e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187120e+019,6.189808e+019] n=1983323
185 sdn=2.323200e+020 t=36953.03s
m=6.188483e+019 sd=5.214871e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187140e+019,6.189827e+019] n=1985304
489 sdn=2.323577e+020 t=37000.16s
m=6.188477e+019 sd=5.210061e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187135e+019,6.189819e+019] n=1987285
811 sdn=2.322592e+020 t=37049.25s
m=6.188467e+019 sd=5.205901e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187125e+019,6.189808e+019] n=1989267
148 sdn=2.321895e+020 t=37101.17s
m=6.188438e+019 sd=5.208418e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187097e+019,6.189780e+019] n=1991248
452 sdn=2.324174e+020 t=37152.09s
m=6.188449e+019 sd=5.204378e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187108e+019,6.189790e+019] n=1993229
741 sdn=2.323526e+020 t=37200.89s
m=6.188425e+019 sd=5.204986e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187084e+019,6.189765e+019] n=1995210
924 sdn=2.324952e+020 t=37248.69s
m=6.188431e+019 sd=5.200230e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187092e+019,6.189771e+019] n=1997192
312 sdn=2.323980e+020 t=37296.34s
m=6.188441e+019 sd=5.195983e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187102e+019,6.189779e+019] n=1999173
685 sdn=2.323234e+020 t=37344.08s
m=6.188431e+019 sd=5.191844e+015 ci(99%)=[6.187093e+019,6.189768e+019] n=2001154
971 sdn=2.322533e+020 t=37391.12s
The complete output does not fit in the post. I uploaded it to Mediafire:

perftmc14_D930.txt (114.91 KB)

(The suffix of D930 is because I ran this MonteCarlo Perft in an Intel Pentium D930).

Those MonteCarlo Perfts are quite similar with my own estimate. I stopped at ~ 2e+9 visited nodes. Even with little time, MonteCarlo Perfts seem accurate... what a good idea!

Just for comparison, François Labelle's estimate for Perft(14) is 6.187e+19. We differ (more less) in 0.0266%, almost the same that in Perft(13) (around 0.0269%). Given the fact that my interval widths are so tiny, it is almost impossible that true Perft(14) value will fit in my interval... but this is not my war: I want to reduce relative errors of my estimates. For Perft(14), I would be satisfied with less than 0.02% of relative error, and extremely satisfied with less than 0.01%. Any thoughts and/or new estimates?

Regards from Spain.

Ajedrecista.
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

After 21 weeks

Post by sje »

After 21 weeks, the run has produced 339,522 draft 8 records, about 41% of the total needed.

Mean time per draft 8 record: ca. 37 seconds

Most recent output:

Code: Select all

rnbqk1nr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/1b6/2N2P2/PPPPPKPP/R1BQ1BNR b kq - 2 3 8 384594840592
rnbqk1nr/pppp1ppp/B7/4p3/4P3/bP6/P1PP1PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq - 2 3 8 854648190142
r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/2n5/4p1N1/4P3/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKB1R b KQkq - 2 3 8 893437028938
r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/2n5/4p3/4P3/7N/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 1 3 9 25813725101835
rnbqk1nr/pppp1ppp/8/2b1p3/4P3/5N2/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKB1R b KQkq - 0 3 8 820873783149
r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/2n5/4p3/4P1P1/P7/1PPP1P1P/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3 8 572869913976
rnbqk1nr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/1b6/2N2PP1/PPPPP2P/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3 8 335124178557
rnbqkbnr/pppp1pp1/8/4p2p/2N5/6P1/PPPPPP1P/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - 1 3 8 519494227731
rnbqk1nr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/4P3/bP6/P1PPNPPP/RNBQKB1R b KQkq - 2 3 8 433499587169
r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/2n5/4p3/4P3/P6P/1PPP1PP1/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3 8 648535056767
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

Draft 11 record numbers 73 through 80

Post by sje »

Draft 11 record numbers 73 through 80:

Code: Select all

rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/1P6/P1PPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 8137029939125842
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/N7/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 7305132917551806
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7N/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 0 2 11 7448912235608842
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/P7/1PPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 6461691208578900
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/1P6/8/P1PPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 7686695009779240
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/2N5/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 9778656804888168
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/P7/8/1PPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 9183507872462177
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/5N2/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 0 2 11 9782585521470037
80 (20%) down, 320 (80%) to go.

Mean time per draft 11 record: ca. 46 hours
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

After 22 weeks

Post by sje »

After 22 weeks the run has produced 362,112 draft 8 records, about 44% of the total needed.

Mean time per draft 8 record: ca. 37 seconds

Also, draft 11 records 81 through 84 of 400 total:

Code: Select all

rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/5p2/8/8/N7/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 1571718175365479
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/5p2/8/8/P7/1PPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 1326258566753566
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/5p2/8/8/1P6/P1PPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 1785313062337724
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/5p2/8/8/7N/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 0 2 11 1583986613138649
Mean time per draft 11 record: ca. 44 hours

Most recent output:

Code: Select all

r1bqkbnr/ppppp1pp/n7/5p2/8/N5PN/PPPPPP1P/R1BQKB1R b KQkq - 0 3 8 94504031542
rnbq1bnr/pppppkpp/8/5p2/8/NP4P1/P1PPPP1P/R1BQKBNR b KQ - 0 3 8 162041642256
r1bqkbnr/ppppp1pp/2n5/5p2/8/N4N2/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBR1 b Qkq - 3 3 8 124335782234
rnbqkbnr/ppppp2p/B4p2/6p1/1P2P3/8/P1PP1PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq - 1 3 8 237750968232
r1bqkbnr/ppppp1pp/n7/5p2/6P1/N6N/PPPPPP1P/R1BQKB1R b KQkq - 0 3 8 110075729658
r1bqkbnr/ppppp1pp/n7/5p2/8/7N/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKB1R b KQkq - 3 3 8 84015702317
rnbqkbnr/ppppp2p/5pp1/8/2B1P3/2N5/PPPP1PPP/R1BQK1NR b KQkq - 1 3 8 395624301944
rnbqkb1r/ppppp1pp/5p1n/8/P1P1P3/8/1P1P1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3 8 264228658777
rnbq1bnr/pppppkpp/8/5p2/6P1/NP6/P1PPPP1P/R1BQKBNR b KQ - 0 3 8 181075627952
r1bqkbnr/ppppp1pp/n7/5p2/2N5/7N/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKB1R b KQkq - 3 3 8 120126984918
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

After 23 weeks

Post by sje »

After 23 weeks the run has produced 388,395 draft 8 records, about 47% of the total needed.

Mean time per draft 8 record: ca. 36 seconds

Also, draft 11 records 85 through 96 of 400 total:

Code: Select all

rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/5p2/8/1P6/8/P1PPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 1808775144978123
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/5p2/8/8/2N5/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 2090524468001630
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/5p2/8/8/5N2/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 0 2 11 2032840268021583
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/5p2/8/P7/8/1PPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 1949607340370874
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/8/5p2/8/N7/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 2070768432115575
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/8/5p2/8/P7/1PPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 1754055249827150
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/8/5p2/8/7N/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 0 2 11 2049559225894245
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/8/5p2/8/1P6/P1PPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 2376996705005730
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/8/5p2/8/2N5/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 2769852377570656
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/8/5p2/8/5N2/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 0 2 11 2698056935637443
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/8/5p2/1P6/8/P1PPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 2393847708449538
rnbqkbnr/ppppp1pp/8/5p2/P7/8/1PPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 2 11 2569896421238279
Mean time per draft 11 record: ca. 40 hours
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

Draft 11 results available for download

Post by sje »

I've made the current list of draft 11 results available for download.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31633927/Perft/Perft13/draft11

There are 104 (26% of 400) of these calculated so far with an average time of about 38 hours per record.

There are none of the 20 draft 12 records yet. When they start to appear, you'll see them in the file:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31633927/Perft/Perft13/draft12 (currently empty)

The draft 11 record set will be the proof of the draft 12 record set, and the draft 12 record set will be the proof of the final perft 13 result.
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

After 24 weeks

Post by sje »

After 24 weeks:

The run has produced 411,380 draft 8 records, about 50% of the total needed.
Mean time per draft 8 record: ca. 35 seconds

The run has produced 106 (26.5%) of the 400 draft 11 records.
Mean time per draft 11 record: ca. 38 hours

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31633927/Perft/Perft13/draft11
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

After 25 weeks

Post by sje »

After 25 weeks:

The run has produced 434,480 draft 8 records, about 53% of the total needed.
Mean time per draft 8 record: ca. 35 seconds

The run has produced 123 (30.75%) of the 400 draft 11 records.
Mean time per draft 11 record: ca. 34 hours

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31633927/Perft/Perft13/draft11
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

End of thread

Post by sje »