| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Daniel Shawul
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 2187 Location: Ethiopia
|
Post subject: Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:26 am |
|
|
Hello and welcome to CC
If I understand you correctly, D = K * log (no_of_opponent_moves) which sort of means we extend more towards positions where the opponent has more moves. I am not sure if that is what you want. Infact we usually extend towards positions where opponent has less moves so that we can nail him by tactics. Checks,single reply,threats, and forced moves in general fall under this category. So the lesser number of moves opponent has the bigger should our search depth be. Maybe D = K /log(no_of_opponent_moves) is what you meant? Also I think taking log of number of opponent moves at one node is not appropriate. That is true only for all the leaf nodes at a level not for one particular node. The number of opponent moves should be taken as it is IMO.
Anyway it is a pleasure to read about your efforts. Hope you enjoy cc. _________________ https://sites.google.com/site/dshawul/
https://github.com/dshawul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Pio Korinth |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:32 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Daniel Shawul |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:26 am |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Heiner Marxen |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:39 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:52 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Stefano Gemma |
Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:01 am |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:53 am |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Pio Korinth |
Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:28 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Laszlo Gaspar |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:26 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Álvaro Begué |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:16 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Karlo Bala Jr. |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:49 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Álvaro Begué |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:02 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Pio Korinth |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:48 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Pio Korinth |
Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:52 pm |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Joona Kiiski |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:18 am |
Re: Counting depth as a function of number of legal moves |
Uri Blass |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:40 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|