| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Larry Kaufman
Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Posts: 1259 Location: Maryland USA
|
Post subject: Re: stand pat or side to move bonus Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:42 pm |
|
|
| rvida wrote: |
| lkaufman wrote: |
Rybka, Stockfish, and Komodo all agree with you on your preference for (A), and for the reasons you give (at least speaking for Rybka and Komodo). I'm sure that the authors of Ippo, Critter, Ivanhoe etc. are aware of this argument. So they must see some compensating advantage in using method (B) or (C). But what could it be? |
I don't really see a fundamental difference between (A) and (B). It should not matter if I grant the bonus inside evaluate() or add it after the call.
As for (C), it sounds like adding the bonus 2x which is again same as (A) or (B) just with 2x higher value. |
I don't think A and B are the same. (A) changes the value whenever the eval is called, while (B) only affects quiescence decisions. Therefore (C) is also different from both.
So the question can be re-phrased, do you believe that the decision to stand pat in quies should be based on a different score than is used for various pruning decisions in the main search? Using methods (B) or (C) would imply this. If so, why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:15 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Sam Hamilton |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:49 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Daniel Shawul |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:27 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:40 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Daniel Shawul |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:27 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:06 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Daniel Shawul |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:07 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:26 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Richard Vida |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:07 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:42 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Richard Vida |
Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:59 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:44 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Richard Vida |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:51 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 2:44 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Richard Vida |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:21 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:40 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Marek Kwiatkowski |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:46 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Richard Vida |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:01 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Robert Hyatt |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:38 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:47 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Uri Blass |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:39 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:45 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Robert Hyatt |
Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:03 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:14 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Robert Hyatt |
Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:41 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Marco Costalba |
Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:12 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:32 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Sam Hamilton |
Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:12 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Robert Hyatt |
Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:00 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:53 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Sune Fischer |
Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:38 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:08 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Uri Blass |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:24 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 2:15 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Ed Schroder |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:02 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:43 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Ed Schroder |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:37 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:51 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Richard Vida |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:33 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:48 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Don Dailey |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:15 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:48 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Richard Vida |
Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:59 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:38 am |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Ed Schroder |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:39 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:49 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:20 pm |
Re: stand pat or side to move bonus |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:47 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|