Luke skywalker has done it again.

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Daniel Shawul
Posts: 4185
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
Location: Ethiopia

Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by Daniel Shawul »

http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8047

King's gambit "weakly solved" by Vas. Admit it. This guy definately knows what he does :)
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by Terry McCracken »

Daniel Shawul wrote:http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8047

King's gambit "weakly solved" by Vas. Admit it. This guy definately knows what he does :)
April Fool's A bit late.
Terry McCracken
User avatar
JuLieN
Posts: 2949
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Full name: Julien Marcel

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by JuLieN »

Terry McCracken wrote:
Daniel Shawul wrote:http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8047

King's gambit "weakly solved" by Vas. Admit it. This guy definately knows what he does :)
April Fool's A bit late.
Sadly this doesn't seem to be a joke... :(

Sadly because KG was my only answer against e5 :'(
"The only good bug is a dead bug." (Don Dailey)
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
Daniel Shawul
Posts: 4185
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
Location: Ethiopia

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by Daniel Shawul »

Nope. 3000 cores IBM cluster working on it for 4 months where all positions with +5.12 are discarded. With an assumption that those are practically won with more than 5-sigma (margin for a discovery I think). Quite an achievement IMO!

P.S: I was actually looking for April Fools announcement when I found that. This is definately real.
Jimmy Huggins
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:00 am
Location: Kansas USA

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by Jimmy Huggins »

Someone should poll this!! To me I don't think it is real. If not, he picked a bad time to reveal it. :lol:
Daniel Shawul
Posts: 4185
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
Location: Ethiopia

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by Daniel Shawul »

Ofcourse vas haters will call BS without bothering to read what is claimed :)
User avatar
Don
Posts: 5106
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:27 pm

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by Don »

Daniel Shawul wrote:http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8047

King's gambit "weakly solved" by Vas. Admit it. This guy definately knows what he does :)
I'm embarrassed for Chessbase.
Capital punishment would be more effective as a preventive measure if it were administered prior to the crime.
Albert Silver
Posts: 3019
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:57 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by Albert Silver »

Terry McCracken wrote:
Daniel Shawul wrote:http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8047

King's gambit "weakly solved" by Vas. Admit it. This guy definately knows what he does :)
April Fool's A bit late.
Depends on the place.
"Tactics are the bricks and sticks that make up a game, but positional play is the architectural blueprint."
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by gerold »

Daniel Shawul wrote:http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8047

King's gambit "weakly solved" by Vas. Admit it. This guy definately knows what he does :)
Solved is the wrong word. Maybe the best move the computer could come up with is more like it. :-)
rbarreira
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:48 pm

Re: Luke skywalker has done it again.

Post by rbarreira »

Daniel Shawul wrote:Nope. 3000 cores IBM cluster working on it for 4 months where all positions with +5.12 are discarded. With an assumption that those are practically won with more than 5-sigma (margin for a discovery I think). Quite an achievement IMO!
I don't understand that part of the article... Look at this:
but if Rybka is displaying +5.12 or more the outcome is 99.99999999% secure. That is approximately the confidence number we give to our King's Gambit results: 99.99999999%.
If the probability of a 5.12 score being a win is 99.99999999%, shouldn't the full calculation (which surely involves a huge amount of >=5.12 scores) have a much smaller probabilty of being correct? And yet he claims the same probability?