| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Marco Costalba
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Posts: 2090
|
Post subject: Re: king safety eval - interesting position Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:17 pm |
|
|
| jdart wrote: |
To clarify, I don't claim there's a win for White here - I just suspect that this and similar positions may be mis-evaluated, statically.
|
IMHO a single eval score says nothing. You always need at least 2: one of the current position (A) and one of a position without what you think gives the advantage (B). For instance in this case you may want to see the evaluation in a very similar position but with the rooks not doubled. Then, if eval(A) > eval(B) there is no case for discussion. I think it is critical to always have clear in mind what evaluations are used for in engines...and no, are not used to analyses the positions in a human like way, are used to decide what is the best move, completely different concept. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
king safety eval - interesting position |
Jon Dart |
Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:59 pm |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Gary |
Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:26 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Jon Dart |
Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:18 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:48 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:52 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Marco Costalba |
Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:17 pm |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Alain Distel |
Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:22 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Alain Distel |
Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:35 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
E Diaz |
Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:45 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:21 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Charles Roberson |
Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:30 pm |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:01 pm |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Jon Dart |
Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:30 am |
Re: king safety eval - interesting position |
Lucas Braesch |
Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:08 am |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|