| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Larry Kaufman
Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Posts: 1229 Location: Maryland USA
|
Post subject: Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:17 pm |
|
|
| beram wrote: |
| lkaufman wrote: |
Well, you were clearly wrong in claiming that H2 was stronger than H1.5 (except in blitz or using multi-cores), so maybe you will again be proven wrong. Your claim of +60 over H1.5 and +40 over H2 is already suspicious, unless you are talking about blitz, since (40 + 0 = 60) is false.
In any case, I think it is desirable for any commercial program to be stronger than any free one, so passing h1.5 (and thereby also h2 in case you make that free eventually) is important for all commercial programs regardless of whether a later commercial engine is stronger than others. |
Well, SedatChess, Frank Quisinksky gave +20 and Vincent Lejeune list give +9
And btw Komodo 4 above 3 on Vincent Lejeune list = + 11 where you claimed to have +25 before release
| Code: |
http://sedat-chess.110mb.com/index.php?p=1_8
+20
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
01 Houdini 2.0 Pro x64 4c 3358 25 24 430 63% 3272 47%
02 Houdini 1.5a x64 4c 3338 17 17 863 62% 3264 49%
http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_swcr-all.txt
+20
NAME / version of engine ELO + - GAM SC OP DR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1 Houdini 2.0c x64 3019 18 18 1400 79% 2777 28%
- 2 Houdini 1.5 x64 2999 14 14 2320 78% 2772 29%
http://home.scarlet.be/vincentlejeune/rating20120402.txt
+9
2 Houdini 2.0 64-bit 4CPU 3303 12 12 2833 76% 3102 32%
3 Houdini 1.5 64-bit 4CPU 3294 10 10 3386 72% 3140 37%
|
|
I acknowledge that Houdini 2 had improved MP scaling over 1.5. I'm talking about the single core performance. The combined results other than blitz show Houdini 2 to be below 1.5 (marginally). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Werner Schüle |
Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:05 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Larry Kaufman |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:06 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Robert Houdart |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:53 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Bram Mourik |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:02 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Gabriel LEPERLIER |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:05 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Larry Kaufman |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:13 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Robert Houdart |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:03 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Bram Mourik |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:56 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Larry Kaufman |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:17 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Werner Schüle |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:21 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Larry Kaufman |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:36 am |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Gerhard Sonnabend |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:01 am |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Gabriel LEPERLIER |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:39 pm |
Re: CEGT - rating lists April 08th 2012 |
Lucas Braesch |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:09 am |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|