| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
H.G.Muller

Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 12758 Location: Amsterdam
|
Post subject: Re: XBoard beta tar ball Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:45 pm |
|
|
The question, however, is whether making this change would now spoil it for people that actually have gettext 0.18 installed on their system. In that case we would have just swapped one problem for another.
That the actual version does not matter is not very surprising, as we are using only the most basic functionality, that 0.01 probably already had. One can hope, of course, that there is some backward compatibility here, where one only has to specify the minimally required version, and that a higher version number would automatically be OK.
[edit]: apparently not! When I change the number in Makefile.in.in to 0.16, it still complains that 0.16 != 0.17.
What I don't understand is that when I change the AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION(0.17) into 0.18, keeping 0.18 in the Makefile.in.in, it still complains that 0.17 != 0.18. Apparently it still takes what I have then, and not what I specify.
Last edited by H.G.Muller on Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:49 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:56 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:27 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:43 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:24 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:29 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:00 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:12 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:31 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:13 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:30 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:47 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:36 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:05 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:17 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:28 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:06 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:18 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:36 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:45 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:53 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:12 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:20 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:28 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:41 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:54 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:56 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:11 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:17 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:11 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:11 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:47 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:30 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:15 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:41 am |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|