| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
H.G.Muller

Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 12912 Location: Amsterdam
|
Post subject: Re: XBoard beta tar ball Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:12 pm |
|
|
Does this mean that the real problem is that we distribute gettext 0.18 with XBoard in the first place, rather than letting it use the corresponding files from the gettext that is installed on the host system (which ./configure assumes we will be using)? Perhaps these gettext files have accidentally leaked into git and the distribution tar ball, and without them everything would be fine, because ./autogen.sh would just generate them locally?
I did notice that when I use "gettextize -f" to cure this problem (something Tim recommended; don't ask me what it is supposed to do) I create tons of changes in all kind of git files, which leads to inability to switch branches because "the working tree is dirty". I then usually cure that again with a "git reset --hard HEAD", which apparently does not subvert the existing Makefile, so that I am OK until the next time ./autogen.sh is run (which sometimes happens automatically, when I switch to a very old branch). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:49 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:56 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:27 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:43 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:24 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:29 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:00 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:12 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:31 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:13 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:30 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:47 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:36 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:05 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:17 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:28 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:06 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:18 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:36 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:45 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:53 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:12 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:20 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:28 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:41 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:54 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:56 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:11 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:17 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:11 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:11 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:47 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:30 pm |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:15 am |
Re: XBoard beta tar ball |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:41 am |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|