| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Don Dailey
Joined: 29 Apr 2008 Posts: 4318
|
Post subject: Re: Elo Increase per Doubling Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 5:41 pm |
|
|
| petero2 wrote: |
| Don wrote: |
The current asymptote is 4209.7 after more data collected.
Basically what you are saying is what we have always known and there are multiple issues here which is why I say this is just for fun. Here are just some of the issues:
1. True chess skill is not transitive.
2. Similar point - true chess skill is multi-dimensional.
3. ELO is not a perfect way to model chess skill.
4. No program can play perfect chess even with infinite resources due to GHI issues.
5. The exponential formula may not even be very appropriate.
6. The book could have some positions that are game theoretic wins.
|
Another issue is that there are multiple ways to implement a perfect player. Assuming chess is a draw and that it was possible to create a 32-man endgame tablebase, an engine that used that EGTB but just randomly picked an optimal move would probably draw a lot of games even against quite weak players. I imagine a game where the engine played black could start something like this:
1. e4 a6
2. d4 a5
Only when the engine risks losing it would play a "reasonable" move. If white later makes a positionally weak move, the engine will likely give up the advantage immediately. Very similar things happen if you play the weak side in a drawn KRBKR endgame against an engine with tablebases but with no "swindle" mode.
On the other hand, a perfect player that actively tries to steer the game towards positions where the opponent must play very exactly to maintain the draw would probably win almost all games even against the best human players. |
Do you really think this matters that much? I think it's an issue but much more minor than we probably think it is. For example, you might get away with 1... a5 in response to 1. d4 but you won't be able to keep doing that. In chess your opportunities for gamesmanship is not that high because the priority must be on playing the best move, not trying to trick your opponent. I once heard that the average number of good moves in chess is less than 2. I don't know if that is true, but it implies that a perfect player may not have that many choices about how to proceed.
But I do think there is an issue with repetition. If a 32 man database knows the position is a draw it should always avoid repetition unless that is the only path to a draw and it cannot win. The other issues I believe are relatively minor. One is trading down too quickly, but I think there is all kinds of complexity in chess even after most of the pieces are traded off. Then there is locked up draw-ish positions. A program specialized to do that might gain an advantage against stronger players. A final issue is drawish endings such as bishop of opposite color. Of course we are assuming the position is a draw anyway, but avoid bishop of opposite color might make it easier to swindle your opponent out of a draw.
I think a 32 man database that avoids repetition is not going to appear boring or passive. Just my opinion, I don't know for sure!
I guess the issue is just the nature of ELO which is one dimensional and transitive and what we are pondering is if you can take a pool of players and pump some ELO points into the rating pool (expanding it) by taking advantage of the multi-dimensional nature of chess skill. I think the answer is probably yes. More complex games such as GO have much greater skill ranges. (If you set the average go player to 1500 ELO the top players would probably be well over 4000.) So adding gamemanship to chess is like turning it into a more complex game with more "moves." _________________ "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons." -Kang and Kodos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Mon May 07, 2012 11:40 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Julien MARCEL |
Mon May 07, 2012 12:04 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Mon May 07, 2012 4:48 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Julien MARCEL |
Mon May 07, 2012 4:54 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Mon May 07, 2012 8:50 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Julien MARCEL |
Mon May 07, 2012 9:00 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Mark Pearce |
Thu May 10, 2012 4:43 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
H.G.Muller |
Mon May 07, 2012 12:13 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Michel Van den Bergh |
Mon May 07, 2012 2:01 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Mon May 07, 2012 5:12 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Mon May 07, 2012 6:40 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Robert Wagner Campos |
Tue May 08, 2012 12:38 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 3:32 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Tue May 08, 2012 10:02 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Julien MARCEL |
Tue May 08, 2012 10:55 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Tue May 08, 2012 8:08 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 11:29 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Kai Laskos |
Tue May 08, 2012 11:59 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Tue May 08, 2012 8:13 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Kai Laskos |
Tue May 08, 2012 10:21 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 10:52 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Tue May 08, 2012 11:14 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Kai Laskos |
Wed May 09, 2012 12:20 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Wed May 09, 2012 2:44 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
H.G.Muller |
Wed May 09, 2012 8:05 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Wed May 09, 2012 5:12 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Larry Kaufman |
Thu May 10, 2012 3:11 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Thu May 10, 2012 5:03 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Larry Kaufman |
Thu May 10, 2012 5:19 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Thu May 10, 2012 12:43 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Peter Österlund |
Thu May 10, 2012 4:59 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Julien MARCEL |
Thu May 10, 2012 5:09 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Thu May 10, 2012 5:41 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Thu May 10, 2012 5:46 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Ed Schroder |
Tue May 08, 2012 12:09 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 12:10 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Ed Schroder |
Tue May 08, 2012 12:28 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 12:36 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Ed Schroder |
Tue May 08, 2012 1:15 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 2:37 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Julien MARCEL |
Tue May 08, 2012 3:15 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 6:15 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Peter Österlund |
Tue May 08, 2012 8:06 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 8:25 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Peter Österlund |
Tue May 08, 2012 9:00 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Julien MARCEL |
Tue May 08, 2012 9:02 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 9:06 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Wed May 09, 2012 4:26 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Peter Österlund |
Wed May 09, 2012 4:52 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Wed May 09, 2012 5:19 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Thu May 10, 2012 1:41 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Thu May 10, 2012 4:52 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Thu May 10, 2012 9:07 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Thu May 10, 2012 10:55 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Fri May 11, 2012 12:46 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Fri May 11, 2012 1:06 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Wed May 09, 2012 5:00 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Tue May 08, 2012 9:05 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 9:18 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Tue May 08, 2012 11:26 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Wed May 09, 2012 2:50 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Adam Hair |
Tue May 15, 2012 3:17 am |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 6:23 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Ed Schroder |
Tue May 08, 2012 12:18 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 12:25 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 12:27 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Robert Hyatt |
Tue May 08, 2012 3:36 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Tue May 08, 2012 5:32 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Daniel Shawul |
Fri May 11, 2012 5:48 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Fri May 11, 2012 6:30 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Julien MARCEL |
Fri May 11, 2012 6:52 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Don Dailey |
Fri May 11, 2012 7:05 pm |
Re: Elo Increase per Doubling |
Daniel Shawul |
Fri May 11, 2012 7:08 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|