Yup that was stated several times on different websites. same chip but iphone is underclocked for battery. IMO, the ipad shouldn't be a lot faster than the iphone with the same chip.Cubeman wrote:I don't know why the iPad 4 is faster, as they both contain the same chip as far as I know. But previous versions of iPad and the same iPhone with identical processor have had iPad a little bit faster. Maybe Apple underclock the iPhone for battery.ernest wrote:Any expectation for the IPhone 5?Cubeman wrote:new iPad 4 which has the dual core A6 chip.
benchmark new smartphones: (Old Thread)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:23 am
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
-
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:11 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
iPhone 4s=225500< iPad 2=274000h1a8 wrote:Yup that was stated several times on different websites. same chip but iphone is underclocked for battery. IMO, the ipad shouldn't be a lot faster than the iphone with the same chip.Cubeman wrote:I don't know why the iPad 4 is faster, as they both contain the same chip as far as I know. But previous versions of iPad and the same iPhone with identical processor have had iPad a little bit faster. Maybe Apple underclock the iPhone for battery.ernest wrote:Any expectation for the IPhone 5?Cubeman wrote:new iPad 4 which has the dual core A6 chip.
iPhone 5=476800< iPad4=510000
So the latest versions of iPhone and iPad is less than 7% and the previous version was over 20%. Don't know why Apple choose to do this underclocking as the same version of the iPod touch is also less again.
-
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:55 am
- Full name: Ted Wong
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
To save battery. The larger the screen size is, the more battery it drains.Cubeman wrote:iPhone 4s=225500< iPad 2=274000h1a8 wrote:Yup that was stated several times on different websites. same chip but iphone is underclocked for battery. IMO, the ipad shouldn't be a lot faster than the iphone with the same chip.Cubeman wrote:I don't know why the iPad 4 is faster, as they both contain the same chip as far as I know. But previous versions of iPad and the same iPhone with identical processor have had iPad a little bit faster. Maybe Apple underclock the iPhone for battery.ernest wrote:Any expectation for the IPhone 5?Cubeman wrote:new iPad 4 which has the dual core A6 chip.
iPhone 5=476800< iPad4=510000
So the latest versions of iPhone and iPad is less than 7% and the previous version was over 20%. Don't know why Apple choose to do this underclocking as the same version of the iPod touch is also less again.
-
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:26 pm
- Location: Switzerland
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
Hello
Do you have an updated chart with Google Nexus 10 ?
Also it seems Ipad 4 is giving good results !
rgds
Do you have an updated chart with Google Nexus 10 ?
Also it seems Ipad 4 is giving good results !
rgds
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:23 am
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
Besides resolution and Android 4..2 the Asus Infinity Pad t700 should be a much better tablet. It has quad core. That's the one I'm interested in.Lion wrote:Hello
Do you have an updated chart with Google Nexus 10 ?
Also it seems Ipad 4 is giving good results !
rgds
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:13 am
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
Samsung Galaxy Note 2 , reporting in ...............
Droidfish , opening move , 4 cores
creped up to 714,000 nps , after 30-45 secs ?
Nice size screen for old people ........
Tom G
Droidfish , opening move , 4 cores
creped up to 714,000 nps , after 30-45 secs ?
Nice size screen for old people ........
Tom G
-
- Posts: 18755
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:40 pm
- Location: US of Europe, germany
- Full name: Thorsten Czub
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
714.000 ??? wow !!WuShock wrote:Samsung Galaxy Note 2 , reporting in ...............
Droidfish , opening move , 4 cores
creped up to 714,000 nps , after 30-45 secs ?
Nice size screen for old people ........
Tom G
thats indeed speed !!
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:23 am
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
Wait till you see the numbers on the Asus infinity t700. It has a very fast quad core too.mclane wrote:714.000 ??? wow !!WuShock wrote:Samsung Galaxy Note 2 , reporting in ...............
Droidfish , opening move , 4 cores
creped up to 714,000 nps , after 30-45 secs ?
Nice size screen for old people ........
Tom G
thats indeed speed !!
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:13 am
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
Concerning my test on my new Galaxy Note 2 , I should have added that I am using Droidfish based on SF 2.3.1 ......
Some of the other benchmarks were 2.2
Question : Does 714k on my telephone = 714 k on my desktop ?
( in terms of SF strength )
Thanks ,
Tom G
Some of the other benchmarks were 2.2
Question : Does 714k on my telephone = 714 k on my desktop ?
( in terms of SF strength )
Thanks ,
Tom G
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:47 am
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Re: benchmark new smartphones:
Not sure if this thread is active anymore but here are some data for iPad Mini:
Setup: Starting position
Analyzing speed after 2 min: 277500 n/s (277,5 Kn/s)
Hardware: Apple A5 dual-core (32 nm)
OS: iOS 6.0.2
App: Stockfish (version 2.4)
Engine: Stockfish 2.3.1 (I believe this is the engine used but I'm not 100% sure)
Setup: Starting position
Analyzing speed after 2 min: 277500 n/s (277,5 Kn/s)
Hardware: Apple A5 dual-core (32 nm)
OS: iOS 6.0.2
App: Stockfish (version 2.4)
Engine: Stockfish 2.3.1 (I believe this is the engine used but I'm not 100% sure)