Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7013
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Rebel »

Werner wrote:You did not optimize this code for 1CPU ?
Uh no, for the reason I already stated. To be more clear, this was quite a complex ride and I have chosen the easy way out not to complicate matters further. I have no intention to further develop the system (I know I have said that more 8-)) other than to document the system.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41486
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Graham Banks »

Rebel wrote:
Werner wrote:You did not optimize this code for 1CPU ?
Uh no, for the reason I already stated. To be more clear, this was quite a complex ride and I have chosen the easy way out not to complicate matters further. I have no intention to further develop the system (I know I have said that more 8-)) other than to document the system.
Still a great gift to the community. :)
Any plans for implementing running on more cores (4 or 8 or 16)?

Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7013
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Rebel »

Werner wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Pretty sure that ProDeo 1.88 was okay too?
Graham.
Hi Graham, I am not sure - how to stop this engine using all the databases?

PS: here Rebel TNG uses 58% of a quad - more than 2 CPUs

regards
Werner
You can not turn off the database search, even if you would manage it will play exactly as ProDeo 1.88. If you don't like the program in its current form siimply don't test it :wink:
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7013
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Rebel »

Graham Banks wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Werner wrote:You did not optimize this code for 1CPU ?
Uh no, for the reason I already stated. To be more clear, this was quite a complex ride and I have chosen the easy way out not to complicate matters further. I have no intention to further develop the system (I know I have said that more 8-)) other than to document the system.
Still a great gift to the community. :)
Any plans for implementing running on more cores (4 or 8 or 16)?

Graham.
You mean SMP? No. Nothing to do with chess, just pesky thechnical stuff I dislike.
Günther Höhne
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Günther Höhne »

Rebel wrote: You can not turn off the database search, even if you would manage it will play exactly as ProDeo 1.88. If you don't like the program in its current form siimply don't test it :wink:
Ed maybe it is possible a version with and a version without database search?

Regards
Günther
Kaj Soderberg
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Kaj Soderberg »

Rebel wrote:
Kaj Soderberg wrote:Hi Ed,

Thank you so much for Rebel TNG. Wonderful news.

One thing though. I cannot get the engine run in analysis mode in ChessPartner. In Arena no problem.

I tried installing in different ways in CP, Winboard 1 and 2 and also Native, but no response in "analysis mode" or in "analyse position" mode. I also changed the "Special" item under "Level" to "Infinite". but no luck.
Normal play works just fine in CP.
Any ideas?

Cheers,
Kaj
My bad!

Rename:

1. Prodeo.cpeini
2. Prodeo.cpevar

To RebelTng.
Yep, that did the trick!

Cheers,
Kaj
User avatar
Eelco de Groot
Posts: 4569
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
Full name:   

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Eelco de Groot »

Werner wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Pretty sure that ProDeo 1.88 was okay too?
Graham.
Hi Graham, I am not sure - how to stop this engine using all the databases?

PS: here Rebel TNG uses 58% of a quad - more than 2 CPUs

regards
Werner
If Rebel TNG launches two threads I don't see how it uses more than two CPUs. But why not test Rebel TNG as a two threads engine? That seems fair enough to the other programs?

Regards, Eelco
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
User avatar
Daniel Mehrmann
Posts: 858
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Daniel Mehrmann

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Daniel Mehrmann »

Eelco de Groot wrote: If Rebel TNG launches two threads I don't see how it uses more than two CPUs. But why not test Rebel TNG as a two threads engine? That seems fair enough to the other programs?

Regards, Eelco
:shock:

If it's just a polling thread and no 'search' related thread it starts to become unfair.
So far as I understand Rebel is a single core engine.

Regards
Daniel
carldaman
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:13 am

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by carldaman »

Rebel wrote:
Werner wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Pretty sure that ProDeo 1.88 was okay too?
Graham.
Hi Graham, I am not sure - how to stop this engine using all the databases?

PS: here Rebel TNG uses 58% of a quad - more than 2 CPUs

regards
Werner
You can not turn off the database search, even if you would manage it will play exactly as ProDeo 1.88. If you don't like the program in its current form siimply don't test it :wink:
Hi Ed,

I am curious if there was something special and indispensable about Prodeo v1.88 (as opposed to the earlier versions 1.86 and 1.87) so that perhaps Rebel TNG could be based solely on it... (?)

The reason I'm asking is that v1.88 seems to be markedly weaker than the previous ones (about 100 points weaker on the CCRL 40/40 list). Could Rebel TNG have been even stronger if based on either prior version instead of 1.88?

Thanks,
CL
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7013
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: Rebel TNG (version 1.0) approximately 2950....

Post by Rebel »

carldaman wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Werner wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Pretty sure that ProDeo 1.88 was okay too?
Graham.
Hi Graham, I am not sure - how to stop this engine using all the databases?

PS: here Rebel TNG uses 58% of a quad - more than 2 CPUs

regards
Werner
You can not turn off the database search, even if you would manage it will play exactly as ProDeo 1.88. If you don't like the program in its current form siimply don't test it :wink:
Hi Ed,

I am curious if there was something special and indispensable about Prodeo v1.88 (as opposed to the earlier versions 1.86 and 1.87) so that perhaps Rebel TNG could be based solely on it... (?)
Uh, no.
The reason I'm asking is that v1.88 seems to be markedly weaker than the previous ones (about 100 points weaker on the CCRL 40/40 list). Could Rebel TNG have been even stronger if based on either prior version instead of 1.88?
Yes, the 1.88 results are odd. I think I messed up, don't know how. And since TNG is based on 1.88 (no other change than adding the pattern knowledge) you could be right that I took the wrong version as a base for TNG.
Thanks,CL
You are welcome Carl.