MD v JL

Traditional chess games and chess topics in general

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

:?:
Top
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by gerold »

Opps. sorry my reply was ot.
Top
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

gerold wrote:Opps. sorry my reply was ot.
Maybe not!
What that we can always intervene if we need to teach the computers who's boss?

(ooops, maybe IS ot).
Top
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

It is going to be a long slow struggle to make that extra pawn count but I feel that a position like this should be winnable if I am patient enough ... and don't make mistakes!
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Top
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

It was a tough decision but Rf1 it is
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Top
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:It was a tough decision but Rf1 it is
[d] 5r1r/1p1bk3/p3pp2/7p/4P1p1/1PNPP3/1P1R2PP/5RK1 w - - 2 24
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8[/pgn]
Top
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

I'm sure that 24.R(2)f2 is being thought about for next move. (I'm not saying it should be played, but I can certainly understand it being contemplated).
Top
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

S.Taylor wrote:
gerold wrote:Opps. sorry my reply was ot.
Maybe not!
What that we can always intervene if we need to teach the computers who's boss?

(ooops, maybe IS ot).
We might not be able to do that unless we plan carefully today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYQrNfS ... e=youtu.be
Terry McCracken
Top
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

d4
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Top
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

it was one of the top moves for consideration
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Top

Return to “Chess Players Forum”