Test no.1 (DiscoCheck w32 comparative)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: Pawny 1.1 w32 test

Post by Sylwy »

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Pharaon 3.5.1 was linked to Nalimov TBs.

Pawny 1.1 was linked to Gaviota TBs (gtb).

Image

Pawny 1.1 w32 has around 2600 Elo CCRL (4/40).

Test dedied to our multicultural and unique Mr. DOC !

:lol:

SilvianR :wink:

Next: Nemeton 1.2
Top
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: Nemeton 1.2 test

Post by Sylwy »

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Perfect_2010.abk & its own book for Nemeton 1.2
-GUI = Arena 3.0
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Image

Very close to Nemeton 1.1 !

SilvianR :wink:

Next (tomorrow): Andscacs 0.81
Top
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: Andscacs 0.81 w32 test + a bonus !

Post by Sylwy »

Hello CCC folks !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Shredder 12 UCI was linked to Nalimov TBs.

Image

Andscacs 0.81 w32 it is in the 3000 Elo CCRL 4/40 area ! And has a superb play !
Bravo Daniel !

Just a (superb) sample:

[pgn]
[Event "Andscacs 0.81 Test"]
[Site "Iasi"]
[Date "2015.06.23"]
[Round "1.1"]
[White "Andscacs 0.8132n"]
[Black "Shredder 12 UCI"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B81"]
[Annotator "-0.06;0.24"]
[PlyCount "73"]
[EventDate "2015.06.23"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[Source "Silvian"]
[TimeControl "240+2"]

{AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3800+ 2411 MHz W=16.6 plies; 261kN/s; Shredder12.
ctg B=11.8 plies; 400kN/s; Shredder12.ctg} 1. e4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]}
c5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 2. Nf3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} e6 {[%eval
0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 3. d4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} cxd4 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 4. Nxd4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:
00:00]} 5. Nc3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} d6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 6.
g4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} h6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 7. h4 {[%eval
0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Be7 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 8. Rg1 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} d5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 9. exd5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:
00:00]} Nxd5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 10. Nxd5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]}
Qxd5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 11. Be3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nc6 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 12. g5 {[%eval -6,17] [%emt 0:00:14]} hxg5 {[%eval
24,12] [%emt 0:00:14]} 13. hxg5 {[%eval -19,17] [%emt 0:00:13]} Ne5 {[%eval 44,
13] [%emt 0:00:22] (Bd7)} 14. Bg2 {[%eval 9,16] [%emt 0:00:08] (Qe2)} Qa5+ {
[%eval 23,13] [%emt 0:00:28]} 15. c3 {[%eval 6,19] [%emt 0:00:11] (Qd2)} Nc4 {
[%eval 21,13] [%emt 0:00:12]} 16. g6 {[%eval 0,18] [%emt 0:00:11] (Qe2)} Nxb2 {
[%eval 16,13] [%emt 0:00:11] (0-0)} 17. gxf7+ {[%eval 0,17] [%emt 0:00:07]
(Qb3)} Kf8 {[%eval 4,13] [%emt 0:00:08]} 18. Qb3 {[%eval 0,18] [%emt 0:00:08]}
Nd3+ {[%eval 26,14] [%emt 0:00:11] (Na4)} 19. Ke2 {[%eval 29,18] [%emt 0:00:07]
} Nc5 {[%eval 18,14] [%emt 0:00:09]} 20. Qc2 {[%eval 47,17] [%emt 0:00:15]
(Qb5)} Bf6 {[%eval -26,13] [%emt 0:00:33]} 21. c4 {[%eval 37,17] [%emt 0:00:13]
(Rh1)} Na4 {[%eval 0,13] [%emt 0:00:16] (Kxf7)} 22. Rac1 {[%eval 59,16] [%emt
0:00:07] (Bd2)} Kxf7 {[%eval 130,12] [%emt 0:00:55]} 23. Nb5 {[%eval 102,18]
[%emt 0:00:10]} Rb8 {[%eval 132,11] [%emt 0:00:15] (Bd7)} 24. Bd2 {[%eval 255,
19] [%emt 0:00:13]} Qa6 {[%eval 131,11] [%emt 0:00:04]} 25. Bf3 {[%eval 418,19]
[%emt 0:00:16]} Bd7 {[%eval 131,11] [%emt 0:00:05] (Nc5)} 26. Qg6+ {[%eval 538,
20] [%emt 0:00:11]} Ke7 {[%eval 110,10] [%emt 0:00:03]} 27. Bb4+ {[%eval 546,
20] [%emt 0:00:25]} Kd8 {[%eval 108,10] [%emt 0:00:01]} 28. Qf7 {[%eval 525,20]
[%emt 0:00:18] (Rgd1)} Nb6 {[%eval 134,10] [%emt 0:00:04] (Re8)} 29. Rxg7 {
[%eval 8194,16] [%emt 0:00:16] (Rgd1)} Bxg7 {[%eval 1360,12] [%emt 0:00:12]}
30. Qxg7 {[%eval 32746,13] [%emt 0:00:09]} Re8 {[%eval 1269,9] [%emt 0:00:02]
(Nd5)} 31. Qg5+ {[%eval 32752,13] [%emt 0:00:05] (Qe5)} Kc8 {[%eval 1026,11]
[%emt 0:00:05]} 32. Qc5+ {[%eval 32754,13] [%emt 0:00:06] (Qe5)} Bc6 {[%eval
32758,10] [%emt 0:00:02]} 33. Bxc6 {[%eval 32756,14] [%emt 0:00:07]} Qxa2+ {
[%eval 32760,10] [%emt 0:00:04]} 34. Kf1 {[%eval 32760,14] [%emt 0:00:07]} Qe2+
{[%eval 32762,12] [%emt 0:00:02] (bxc6)} 35. Kxe2 {[%eval 32762,13] [%emt 0:00:
05]} Na8 {[%eval 32764,10] [%emt 0:00:01] (bxc6)} 36. Bh1+ {[%eval 32764,11]
[%emt 0:00:07] (Be4+)} Kd8 {[%eval 32766,12] [%emt 0:00:03]} 37. Rd1# {[%eval
32766,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} 1-0
[/pgn]

Like bonus five images from IASI (the Copou Garden, the Princiary Palace and the Russian Church):

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Top
User avatar
cdani
Posts: 2204
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra

Re: Andscacs 0.81 w32 test + a bonus !

Post by cdani »

:-)
Thanks for the tournament!
Top
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: Komodo 8-9-9.1 comparative test

Post by Sylwy »

Hello CCC folks !

A friend of mine did a very interesting triple test: Stockfish 6 versus Komodo8-Komodo 9 & Komodo 9.1. The results are extremely interesting (for example - compare please Komodo 8 result versus Komodo 9 result) !

Conditions:

-128 MB hash
-TC = 4'+2"
-a very basic entry-level PC (1 CPU; 32-bit OS).

All engines were linked to Syzygy Bases.

Image

Image

Image

Like bonus a test of Komodo 8 versus a good development version (24-05-2015-v14):

Image

The results (and many more) show me that Komodo is a chess engine optimized for high-end systems.

Regards,
SilvianR :wink:
Top
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: Hakkapeliitta 3.0 w32 test

Post by Sylwy »

Hello CCC folks !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Shredder 11 UCI was linked to Nalimov TBs and Shredder bases (loaded into the RAM memory).
Hakkapeliitta 3.0 was linked to Syzygy Bases.

Image

In my opinion Hakkapeliitta 3.0 w32 it's very close to 2900 Elo CCRL 4/40 !
A superb chess engine coming from Finland !

Regards,
SilvianR :wink:

NR: until the midd of August Ruxy is in mountains ! So, no boring tests ! :lol:

Image
Top
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: Cheng 4.39 w32 test + a bonus !

Post by Sylwy »

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

iCE 2.0 used the own generated bitbases.

Image

Image

Superb ! Bravo, Martin !

Like bonus some Moldavian fortress (Neamt; Soroca; Suceava) of the Medieval period:

Image

Image

Image

Have a nice weekend !
SilvianR :wink:
Top
mar
Posts: 2554
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Full name: Martin Sedlak

Re: Cheng 4.39 w32 test + a bonus !

Post by mar »

Thanks Silvian :)
Have a superb weekend ;)

The fortress looks really huge, I googled a bit to get more pictures, found even some aerial to get the idea ;)
Top
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: Andscacs w32 comparative test + a bonus !

Post by Sylwy »

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Shredder 12 UCI used Nalimov TBS & Shredderbases (loaded into the RAM memory).

Image

Image

Like bonus four images from Northern Moldavia:

Image

Image

Image

Image


Regards,
SilvianR :wink:
Top
User avatar
cdani
Posts: 2204
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra

Re: Andscacs w32 comparative test + a bonus !

Post by cdani »

Thanks! The result is between the expected margins; this new version is more improved in multithread mode.
Top

Return to “Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches”